Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: faridabad development corporation act 1956 section 1 short title Page 1 of about 52,099 results (0.756 seconds)

Sukhdev Singh, Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Life Insurance Corporat ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC1331; [1975(30)FLR283]; 1975LabIC881; (1975)ILLJ399SC; (1975)1SCC421; [1975]3SCR619

..... so specifically. this also illustrates the provision of clause (51) of section 3 of the general clauses act which defines 'rule' as including a regulation intended to be made as a rule.151. the faridabad development corporation act, 1956 confers the power to make rules on the central government but no power is given to the ..... corporation to make any regulations.152. the indian medicine central council act, 1970 confers the power to make rules on the central government ..... to make regulations on the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission.161. the national co-operative development corporation act, 1962 confers the power to make rules on the central government and the power to make regulations on the corporation.162. i have gone through the various statutes only to point out that under the .....

M.C. Mehta Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT421a(SC)

..... considerable length for several days. we have been taken through the provisions of delhi development act, 1957, master plan for delhi published in the gazette of india dated august 1, 1990, delhi development authority (zoning) regulations, 1983, delhi municipal corporation act, 1957, faridabad complex administration (regulations and development) act, 1971, the development plan for the faridabad-ballabgarh controlled areas published in the haryana government gazette dated december 17, 1991, air ..... court shall stand dismissed with no order as to costs.(4) the stone crushers in the union territory of delhi/faridabad-ballabgarh complex which do not have valid licences from the authorities under the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957/faridabad complex administration (regulations and development) act, 1971 or from any other authority which the law requires, shall stop functioning and operating with immediate effect.(5) the .....

Hari Chand and ors. Vs. Faridabad Complex Administration and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC2429; 2005(2)ESC252; [2005(105)FLR765]; JT2005(4)SC608; (2005)IILLJ1085SC; (2005)4SCC592; 2005(2)SLJ432(SC)

..... appellants and legal representatives of one mr. gardia. from the record, it appears that these five persons were employees of the faridabad development board which was converted into faridabad notified area committee, later on renamed as faridabad complex administration and finally as faridabad municipal corporation. the particulars of their service are as detailed below;appellant name date of date of no. appointment retirement___________________________________________________________a-1 hari chand ..... to government employees. according to the administration, the petitioners could not be said to be government employees. they were governed by act of 1971 and their service conditions were regulated by the said act and the rules made thereunder. under that act, they were entitled to contributory provident fund which was paid to them. it was, therefore, prayed that they had no cause .....

ishwar Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1996P& H30

..... court shall stand dismissed with no order as to costs. (4) the stone crushers in the union territory of delhi/faridabad-ballabgarh complex which do not have valid licenses from the authorities under the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957/faridabad complex administration (regulations and development) act, 1971 or from any other authority which the law requires, shall stop functioning and operating with immediate effect. (5) the ..... stone crushers, in respect of which closure orders/directions have been issued by the central pollution control board under section 31-a of air (prevention and control ofpollution) act, 1981 or by .....

Bhim Sen and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)112PLR617

..... under the instructions. since the land comes within the purview of an urban area and the same falls within the municipal limits of faridabad complex administration (now municipal corporation) a fully developed town and a satellite to delhi, the petitioners have no right even on the basis of these instructions.5. during the pendency of ..... restrained tike defendants from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff and permitted the defendants to dispossess the plaintiff in accordance with the provisions of the act and the rules framed there under. so, even the civil court permitted the answering respondents from taking all permissible steps to evict the unauthorised occupants ..... being heard.(5) where any person is, or has at any time been in unauthorised possession of any evacuee property acquired under this act, the managing officer or the managing corporation may, having regard to such principles of assessment of damages as may be specified in this behalf by the central government, by .....

Eros City Developers Private Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)150PLR492

..... which is governed as per provisions of section 4 of the 1963 act read with section 29 of the faridabad corporation act, 1971 (?) and section 346 of the haryana municipal corporation act, 1994 (for brevity, 'the 1994 act'). it has further been asserted that development plan for the controlled area was prepared vide notification dated 22.1 ..... .1966, which was revised vide notification dated 11.12.1991. as per provisions of section 7 of the 1963 act ..... promote tourism in the state of haryana and for systematic development of the tourist complex the land has rightly been acquired by following various provisions of the act.12. in the written statement filed on behalf of the municipal corporation, faridabad-respondent no. 2 it has been asserted that the site .....

Bhatia Art Service Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)114PLR479

..... on the basis of permission/licence granted to them by the authorities of erstwhile faridabad complex under the provisions of faridabad complex (regulation and development) act, 1971 (to be referred hereinafter as '1971 act'). even after coming into force of the haryana municipal corporation act, 1994 (to be referred hereinafter as '1994 act'), the municipal corporation, faridabad gave permission to petitionerno.1, to display 65 hoardings for a period of ..... date, unless a different intention appears.'(a) reference to faridabad complex administration, faridabad under the faridabad complex (regulation and development) act, 1971, shall be construed as reference to the municipal corporation of faridabad, and such enactment, rule, order or notification shall apply to the municipal area of the corporation;(b) references to the chief administrator under the faridabad complex (regulation and development) act, 1971, shall be construed in respect of the .....

Municipal Corporation Vs. Hindustan Vidyut Products Limited

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)136PLR358

..... and 7 of 1963 act read with sections 347 and 348 of the haryana municipal corporation act, 1994 erection or re-erection of the building and use of land in declared controlled area cannot be permitted without approval of the director i.e. the commissioner, municipal corporation, faridabad and, therefore, development charges have to be ..... paid.7. the trial court held that the plaintiff-respondent having already paid development charges ..... industry association and the huda. firstly, demand was raised for a sum of rs. 1,17,320.87 on account of external development charges by the municipal corporation, faridabad and similar demand had earlier been raised by the huda. the civil judge in the suit filed against huda has injuncted huda from .....

m.c.mehta Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 18th march, 2004 was restricted only to mining activities and did not affect the development or urbanisation or construction activities carried out as per the laws, rules and regulations of the municipal corporation of faridabad or the haryana urban development authority. despite the clear judgment and order passed by this court, the attitude of ..... town planner in the department of town & country planning. it was stated in the affidavit that the development plan for faridabad had been prepared in accordance with the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas restrictions of unregulated development act, 1963 and the final 11 w.p. no.4677 of 1985 ias. 2310/2008 etc. in ..... of the notification 125. reliance was then placed on the provisions of sub-section (1) and sub-section (7) of section 29 of the faridabad complex (regulation and development) act, 1971 to submit that the notification dated 18th august, 1992 was not applicable to controlled areas. these provisions read as follows: section 29 - .....

Shrimati Usha Adlakha Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)113PLR407

..... punjab industrial development corporation and the petitioner entered into an agreement for purchase of the land with the punjab united forge limited. the petitioner says that after purchase of the property, she applied for permission to raise construction in the form of a shopping centre and the chief administrator, faridabad complex administration, faridabad granted permission ..... compelling her to file a civil suit for injunction in the civil court at faridabad. the suit was contested by the haryana urban development authority on the ground of bar contained in section 50(2) of the haryana urban development authority act, 1977. the petitioner says that on 1.6.1976, the government of haryana ..... delay. their lordships held :-'there is yet another and a very strong factor militating against the writ petitions. not only did they also failed to act soon after the declarations under section 6 were made. as stated above, the declarations under section 6 were made in the year 1978 and the present .....