Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: faridabad development corporation act 1956 section 1 short title Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 4,186 results (0.195 seconds)

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. B.S.E.S. Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2008)113TTJ(Mum.)227

..... rightly been held as revenue expenditure. this view is fortified by the decision of the hon'ble gujarat high court in the case of baroda industrial development corporation ltd. (supra), wherein the assessee company carrying on business for providing facilities such as electricity and water to industrial units, incurred expenditure on underground electricity ..... proportionate amount in respect of donation paid to the school, during the relevant year which was allowed under the provisions of section 37(1) of the act. in view of the above background this expenditure incurred for improving working condition of area inhabited by the employees and others is allowable expenditure. we hold ..... including the contentions raised before the ao were reiterated. after considering the same, the cit(a) observed that as per section 145(1) of the it act, 1961, income-tax chargeable under the head 'profits and gains of business or profession' is to be computed in accordance with either cash or mercantile system .....

West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2006)100TTJ(Mum.)833

..... present case.8. the learned senior counsel submitted that the issue is straightaway covered by the recent decision of the orissa high court in the case of industrial development corporation of orissa ltd. v. cit . in that case also, the issue was that of allowing the depreciation on the machinery purchased and lease-back. the revenue ..... manufactured by the new unit and consumed by the assessee itself for its existing business was not relevant in considering deduction available under section 80j of the it act, 1961. we are of the considered opinion that our finding is supported by the above judicial pronouncements.30. the exemption itself was introduced as an incentive ..... from market and the castings were used by the other existing division of the assessee itself. the assessee claimed exemption of tax under section 15c of the it act, 1922 in respect of the profit from the steel foundry division which was denied by the revenue authorities. the supreme court held that self-consumption of .....

Bima Office Premises Co-operative Society and Etc. Vs. Kalamboli Villa ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2001Bom83; 2001(1)MhLj806

..... petitioners are incorporated under the provisions of indian companies act, 1956, and is inter alia, engaged in shipping related activities. the respondent no. 1 herein is a gram panchayat of pagote village, taluka uran, district raigad. the respondent no. 2, the city and industrial development corporation of maharashtra limited (hereinafter referred to as the ..... section 113-a deals with the power of thestate government to acquire land for corporation or company declared to be new town development authority, whereas objects of the development authority are to be found under section 114 of the said act. the provisions of section 113-a read as under :'113a. power of state ..... to (4) ... (5) on the constitution of, or on the declaration of any corporation or company as, a development authority for any new town, the local authority or authorities functioning, within the area designated under this act as a site for the new town, immediately before such constitution or declaration shall cease to .....

M/S Faridabad Metal Udyog Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Anurag Deepak, Sole ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the authority referred to in sub-section (1) of section 8, and includes, (i) the national small industries corporation, being a company, registered under the companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956); (ii) the small industries development corporation of a state or a union territory, by whatever name called, being a company registered under the companies ..... petitioner is a small scale industry registered under the provisions of msme act with district industries centre, faridabad, haryana on 4th august 2009. the petitioner is a manufacturer of lpg cylinders of various capacity and supply those cylinders to respondent no.2 corporation and other two oil companies. (b) since 1994, the second respondent ..... filed present petition under section 14 read with section 11 of the said arbitration act. 4. relevant facts in arbp no.55 of 2013: (a) the petitioner is a small scale industry registered with district industries centre, faridabad on 8th february 2008. on 1st april 1999 and 31st march 2000, contracts were .....

Madhuvihar Cooperative Housing Society, and ors. Vs. M/S. Jayantilal I ...

Court : Mumbai

..... clause 9 : the said persons shall convey the land under the building and land to be kept open as per building regulations, development control rules of greater bombay municipal corporation to the buyers of the tenements as and when they form cooperative housing society.clause 13 : the area required to be kept open ..... 6071 sqm. emerged as the suit land. on 16-11-1984, the promoter obtained noc under section 21(1) of the urban land ceiling act, 1976 ("ulc act") permitting it to construct a building with 7 wings and 137 tenements for weaker section. the construction was to be made in accordance with the ..... the additional building. the learned counsel further submits that the permission under the provisions of urban land ceiling (for short, hereinafter referred to as "ulc") act, 1976, was subject to the provisions of the mofa and, therefore, reference to the permission granted by ulc authorities, was also not necessary for considering .....

Sneha Mandal Co-operative Housing Society Limited and Others Vs. the U ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2000Bom121; 2000(1)ALLMR659; 2000(1)BomCR395; (2000)1BOMLR13

..... notification 1991? facts : 19. crz notification came into force with effect from 19th february 1991. on 26th may 1983, respondent no. 4-municipal corporation, prepared the revised draft development plan for 'a' ward in which plot 146 and 147 are located. in the said plan, the above two plots alongwith plot 148 came ..... came to be issued under section 3(1) and section 3(2)(v) of the environmental (protection) act, 1986. by the said notification, government of india brought into force, rules/ regulations severely restricting development and construction activities in the area known as coastal regulation zone as defined in the said notification. the ..... taking stock of the existing legal provisions dealing with environment protection and finding them to be hazardously inadequate, the parliament enacted the environment (protection) act, 1986. under this act, sections 3, 4 and 5 authorise the central government plenary powers to take all steps and measures as it deems necessary or expedient for .....

international Computers India Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)63ITD195(Mum.)

..... appeal before the tribunal, it was contended that there was no "sale" or "transfer" within the meaning of section 34(3)(b) of the act, permitting withdrawal of the development rebate of rs. 1,00,093, granted earlier and in this view the amendment order passed by the ito was improper and unjustified. the tribunal ..... concept of leasing has been it appears was developed on this reasoning also apart from the observation as was made at the time of introduction of section 32a of the act, "the present scheme of investment allowance will facilitate investment in priority industries and reduce the dependence of the corporate sector on public financial institutions." 14.18 ..... -72 which was leased out ?" the facts of the cases as noted by the high court are reproduced below : "the assessee-company owned a factory in faridabad; wherein it had installed machinery, etc. for manufacturing various items of iron and steel including heavy castings. the accounting year of the assessee-company ends every year .....

Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Ltd. Vs. Jignesh Shah and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... construction. mr. dwarkadas therefore submitted that the ratio of the division bench judgment in the case of chhedahousing development corporation vs. bibi jaan s.farid (2007 (2) bcr 587)would clearly apply. 34. mr. dwarkadas further submitted that the provisions of the maharashtra ownership flats act ( mofa ) were mandatory and would apply in respect of the present construction. under section 2 (f) of ..... for hearing. 3. briefly set out the facts in the matter are as under: 4. under the provisions of the maharashtra regional and town planning act 1966 ( mrtp act ), development control regulations ( dcr ) were formulated by the municipal corporation of greater mumbai, which were sanctioned by the state of maharashtra and came into force with effect from 25th march, 1991. dcr 33 (7) inter .....

Shantilal J. Shah and Others Vs. Jitendra Sanghavi and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... obtain necessary approval from various authorities, in connection with the further development of the said property to be submitted by the developers on behalf of the owners to the competent authority under the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1976, mumbai municipal corporation, town planning authority or any other government or semi-government authorities ..... obtain necessary approval from various authorities in connection with the further development of the suit property, to be submitted by the developers on behalf of the vendors to the competent authority under the urban land (ceiling and regulations) act, 1976, mumbai municipal corporation, town planning authority or any other government or semi-government authorities ..... being specifically enforced. i am fortified in my view by the decision of the hon'ble division bench of this court in chheda housing development corporation vs. bibijan shaikh farid and others 2007 (3) mh.l.j. 402. 22. despite being of the prima facie view that the .....

Ravindra Mutneja, Vs. Bhavan Corporation a Partnership Firm, Registere ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR521; 2003(5)BomCR695

..... . the lay-out plan would have be approved under the m.r.t.p. act, regulation and bye-laws. therefore, the builder must obtain the permission both under the development regulation as also licence under the mumbai municipal corporation act, 1888.factually, on the facts of the case as on record the two buildings are touching each other ..... financial loss. it has repeatedly come to our notice that in the city of bombay builders by joining hands with the officer of the corporation openly flout every conceivable rule, including development control rules. the builder are under the impression that once the shell of the building is illegally constructed then the court can be persuaded ..... this court in another judgment in the case of bombay environmental action group v. bombay municipal corporation in writ petition no. 1473 of 1984 decided on 19.10.1994 when it was argued on the part of the developer that financial loss would be caused if they were restricted from building, the division bench rejected .....