Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: faridabad development corporation act 1956 section 1 short title Page 7 of about 52,099 results (0.840 seconds)

Nov 01 2011 (HC)

Shri Mangal Ram Vs. Smt. Samar Jahan

Court : Uttaranchal

..... question. in support of his argument learned counsel for the respondent relied on the judgment of honble apex court rendered in oriental aroma chemical industries ltd. vs. gujarat industrial development corporation and another, reported in 2010 (2) supreme-115 and salil dutta vs. t. m. and m.c. private ltd. reported in air (scw) 1178. 5. i ..... court, managed to obtain a stay order to further delay execution proceedings. he submitted that the applicant is not entitled for the benefit of section 14 of limitation act, as the applicant is abusing the process of law. he drew attention of the court towards paragraph-12 of the objection dated 22.03.2010 filed by ..... advice, he did not file second appeal before this court in the year 2004 itself, therefore, he is entitled for the benefit under section 14 of limitation act which provides that in case the litigant avails wrong remedy against any judgment, the intervening time consumed in availing proper remedy will be given to such litigant. learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 1991 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Derco Cooling Coils Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1992)104CTR(AP)55; [1992]198ITR375(AP)

..... with the view taken by the tribunal. we are unable to see any connection between the two amounts. the amount upon which interest was paid to a.p. industrial development corporation limited was raised by way of loan for setting up the plant and the interest income was earned on the contributions made by the shareholders towards the shares allotted to ..... them. both are distinct items and it is not possible to see any reasonable connection between them. neither by section 57(iii) of the income-tax act, 1961, nor by applying the test of prudent person managing his affairs, can it be said that the interest earned on the contributions made by the shareholders can be ..... , of the view that the amount of rs. 18,913 has been rightly treated by the income-tax officer as income from other sources under section 56 of the act and the tribunal erred in law in annulling the assessment. we are fortified in the view which we have taken by the decision of the madras high court in cit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2004 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shiv Ratan Soni

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Raj)126; [2005]279ITR261(Raj)

..... divekar & a.p. divekar v. cit : [1986]157itr629(bom) 4. cit v. sukhlal ice cold storage co. : [1992]196itr562(all) 5. cit v. kerala state cashew development corporation : [1992]198itr520(ker) (ker).in chhugamal rajpal v. s.p. chaliha : [1971]79itr603(sc) , the apex court was faced with a case where no reasons as required to be ..... a) or (b) of section 147, are satisfied, the ito has no jurisdiction to issue a notice under section 148.'finding that important safeguards provided under the act are not followed, the notices were quashed by reversing the judgment of high court. this case demonstrates reasons supplied subsequent to issuance of notice cannot validate the proceedings ..... of the assessee. the search took place in november, 1988. it was found by the tribunal that the ao, while exercising jurisdiction under section 147 must act on his own satisfaction and not on derivative satisfaction of some other officer, therefore, the basic precondition for the ao to hold the reason to believe that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2013 (HC)

T.Omanakuttan Pillai Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

..... , we are unable to sustain the order impugned.8. we are also fortified by the decision of the supreme court of india rendered in jajodia (overseas) pvt. ltd.v. industrial development corporation of orissa ltd. (1993 (2) scc 106). at paragraph-8, it is held that: "it is, we think, necessary first, to clear some cobwebs. a speaking or reasoned ..... 200.think that the petitioner was successful in showing that the award passed by the arbitrator is vitiated or that any of the grounds enumerated under section 34 of the act was available to the petitioner to set aside the award. it is apparent from the face of the records that such an observation was made by the learned district ..... impugned order dated 24.2.2006, that petition was dismissed. assailing the above order, this appeal was preferred under section 37 :2. arb.a.no.14 of 200.of the act.2. heard both sides. perused the impugned order as well as the impugned award. before us mainly three grounds were urged. they are: (i) the award is in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Southern Roadways Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)181CTR(Mad)340; [2004]265ITR404(Mad)

..... of inclusion of driver's salary under section 37(3a), the point is covered by the decision of this court in cit v. tamil nadu poultry development corporation : [2002]254itr360(mad) , wherein it was held that the driver's salary should not be included for the purpose of computing disallowance of expenditure ..... restore, renovate. to restore to a sound or good state after decay, injury, dilapidation, or partial destruction'. whereas the meaning of the expression, 'maintenance' is 'act of maintaining, keeping up, supporting.....'. from the dictionary meaning of these two expressions it is very clear that the expression 'repair' presupposes certain injury or partial destruction. ..... accordingly. on appeal by revenue, the tribunal upheld the order of cit(a). hence, the question referred to as above. 3. section 37(3b) of the act speaks of expenses incurred in running and maintenance of motor vehicle. the expressions 'repairs' and 'maintenance' are two different expressions. 'repair' means 'to mend, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 1989 (HC)

Indian Oxygen Ltd. Vs. National Oxygen Ltd. and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1990)1CALLT275(HC),[1991]72CompCas378(Cal)

..... fact, in aproceeding under section 20 of the arbitration act, although it is treated asa suit, no leave under clause 12 of the letters patent is necessary. learnedadvocate also relied upon a judgment and decision in the case of dasconsultants p. ltd. v. national mineral development corporation ltd., : air1981cal202 , and submitted that no leave ..... of the agreement, that allegation cannot, in our opinion, confer jurisdiction to this court to entertain the present application filed under section 20 of the act.'8. in my opinion, the said decision cannot be of any assistance to the defendant inasmuch as the execution of the agreement cannot confer jurisdiction on ..... , the same shall be referred for arbitration to the bengal chamber of commerce and industry and such arbitration shall be governed by the provisions of the arbitration act, 1940, and any statutory modification thereof applicable at the relevant time.'2. by letter dated october 19, 1985, the defendant, national oxygen ltd., accepted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2008 (SC)

Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(13)SCALE478

..... the deputy commissioner, faridabad, on 22.8.2005. the petitioners also make a grievance that neither they were heard nor informed about the so called conclusions of the enquiry for about 12 months. they make a further grievance that colonizer has failed to discharge his obligations under the haryana urban development act, 1975 (in short the `act') and haryana municipal corporation amendment act, 2001 (hereinafter referred ..... to as the `amendment act'). grievance is also made that the colonizer has failed to discharge the obligations as per the licence agreement.3. after hearing learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2015 (HC)

Prabhakar Reddy Vs. H.R. Ravichandra and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... the arbitration. in support of his submissions, he relies on the delhi high court's decision in the case of m/s. national small industries corporation ltd., new delhi v. punjab tin printing and metal industries, ajraunda, faridabad (haryana) and others reported in air 1979 delhi 58(1). 16. the submissions of the learned counsel have received my thoughtful consideration. the following ..... owners and by the petitioner and dr. n.venugopala reddy in their capacity as the partners of m/s. classic enterprises, the property developers. assuming that the said partners have acted without the authority from the other partners, their acts are to be challenged in separate and appropriate proceedings by the aggrieved parties. besides, if any document is obtained by fraud, that question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 2000 (HC)

Bima Office Premises Co-operative Society and Etc. Vs. Kalamboli Villa ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2001Bom83; 2001(1)MhLj806

..... petitioners are incorporated under the provisions of indian companies act, 1956, and is inter alia, engaged in shipping related activities. the respondent no. 1 herein is a gram panchayat of pagote village, taluka uran, district raigad. the respondent no. 2, the city and industrial development corporation of maharashtra limited (hereinafter referred to as the ..... section 113-a deals with the power of thestate government to acquire land for corporation or company declared to be new town development authority, whereas objects of the development authority are to be found under section 114 of the said act. the provisions of section 113-a read as under :'113a. power of state ..... to (4) ... (5) on the constitution of, or on the declaration of any corporation or company as, a development authority for any new town, the local authority or authorities functioning, within the area designated under this act as a site for the new town, immediately before such constitution or declaration shall cease to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2004 (SC)

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC4016; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)353; (2004)3CompLJ199(SC); JT2004(4)SC181; 2004(3)SCALE396; (2004)12SCC118

..... . the central ground water authority (cgwa) has notified these areas - south district or nct delhi, faridabad, ballabhgarh municipal corporation area, gurgaon town as water stressed areas and has put regulatory measures on ground water development in these areas. given all this, cgwb concludes that the 'dewatering of mines in the aravalli hills ..... water harvesting efforts. 4. the ministry of environment and forests (moef) should be asked to extend the notification under the environment (protection) act to the faridabad part of the aravalli and ridge as well. currently, the notification is only for gurgaon district. this notification declaring it an ecologically sensitive area ..... a matter of right for the following reasons.15. the rules dealt with a situation prior to the coming into operation of 1980 act. '1980 act' was an act in recognition of the awareness that deforestation and ecological imbalances as a result of deforestation have become social menaces and further deforestation and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //