Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: faridabad development corporation act 1956 section 1 short title Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 526 results (0.117 seconds)

M/S. K.B. Co-op. Art Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... part of tender form, reads as under:27. in case of dispute regarding any matter shall have to be referred to the managing director, rajasthan tourism development corporation ltd., jaipur for arbitration and his decision shall be binding on both the parties and all legal matter shall be subject to the jurisdiction of jaipur city ..... is per-se arbitrary. the petitioner has also assailed the action of the corporation on the ground that decision to its detriment is in clear violation of statutory requirements contained under the rajasthan transparency in public procurement act 2012 (for short, act of 2012 ). with a view to substantiate its afflictions in this behalf, ..... matter of award of commercial contract by state instrumentality held as under:7. the law relating to award of a contract by the state, its corporations and bodies acting as instrumentalities and agencies of the government has been settled by the decision of this court in ramana dayaram shetty v. international airport authority of .....

Mohd. HussaIn Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992(1)WLN201

..... petitioner still temporary. learned counsel for the petitioner laces reliance on a decision of their lordships of the supreme court in shri bhagwati prasad v. delhi state mineral development corporation : (1990)illj320sc . in the first instance, it is contended that after 17 years' continuous service, petitioner cannot still be termed as temporary so as to ..... punishment. thus, the termination of the services of the petitioner squarely comes within the meaning of retrenchment as defined in section 2(oo) of the i.d. act, 1947. it is also apparent from the order, itself, that the condition precedent for bringing about valid retrenchment has not been complied with, therefore, the ..... immediate termination of his services but no retrenchment compensation was given as was required to be paid to him under section 25f(b) of the industrial disputes act, 1 947 and, therefore, the order annex.3 is void for having not complied-with the condition, precedent for bringing about valid retrenchment.2. in .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shiv Ratan Soni

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Raj)126; [2005]279ITR261(Raj)

..... divekar & a.p. divekar v. cit : [1986]157itr629(bom) 4. cit v. sukhlal ice cold storage co. : [1992]196itr562(all) 5. cit v. kerala state cashew development corporation : [1992]198itr520(ker) (ker).in chhugamal rajpal v. s.p. chaliha : [1971]79itr603(sc) , the apex court was faced with a case where no reasons as required to be ..... a) or (b) of section 147, are satisfied, the ito has no jurisdiction to issue a notice under section 148.'finding that important safeguards provided under the act are not followed, the notices were quashed by reversing the judgment of high court. this case demonstrates reasons supplied subsequent to issuance of notice cannot validate the proceedings ..... of the assessee. the search took place in november, 1988. it was found by the tribunal that the ao, while exercising jurisdiction under section 147 must act on his own satisfaction and not on derivative satisfaction of some other officer, therefore, the basic precondition for the ao to hold the reason to believe that .....

Rameshwarlal and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation a ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1972WLN553

..... tyagi air 1970 sc 244, to which reference has been made already. the petitioner there was an employee of the up warehousing corporation, which was constituted under the agricultural produce (development and warehousing) corporations act, 1966. their lordships of the supreme court examined the question as to when and under what circumstances a relief by way of ..... sc 244 where their lordships of the supreme court have taken the view that the regulations made under section 54 of the agriculture produce (development and warehousing) corporations act, 1956, do not impose any statutory obligation even though they lay down the terms and conditions of the relationship between the ..... air 1966 s.c. 1064 would seem to support the respondent. there, the order of termination of the appellant's service by the corporation a body set up under the road transport corporations act, 1960, was held to be bad in law on account of its being in contravention of clause (4)(b) of the regulations containing .....

Praveen Kumar and anr. Vs. JaIn Vishva Bharati Institute and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2528; 2004(4)WLC219

..... as a state agency.10. the various controls which are exercised by the state under the provisions of the different enactments such as factories act, industries (development and regulation) act are of special significance.11. the expression 'other authorities' in article 12 must be given a board and liberal interpretation where constitutional fundamentals ..... the government in many of its commercial ventures and public enterprises is resorting to more and more frequently to this resourceful legal contrivance of a corporation because it has many practical advantages and at the same time does not involve the slightest diminution in its ownership and control of the undertaking. ..... by government, they may be completely free from governmental control in the discharge of their functions. what then are the tests to determine whether a corporation established by statute or incorporated under law is an instrumentality or agency of government? it is not possible to formulate an all- inclusive or .....

Cit Vs. Lake Palace Hotels and Motels (P) Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2001)167CTR(Raj)169

..... an integral part of its generation system and, therefore, it is a plant and is entitled to investment allowance. thus, the decision in karnataka power corporations case (supra) is distinguishable on facts inasmuch there the investment in building was held to be a business apparatus of a business of generating electricity to ..... plant or machinery to become eligible to claim deduction on account of investment allowance subject to fulfilment of other conditions. the supreme court in karnataka power corporations case (supra) while applying the test that where a building is so planned or constructed as to serve an assessees special technical requirement, it will ..... is to be found against allowability of investment allowance under the scheme of the provisions of the act. while claim for depreciation and investment allowance are not mutually exclusive but the claim for investment allowance and development rebate are mutually exclusive, that is to say that where the assessee is entitled to claim .....

Commissioner of Income Tax, Jodhpur Vs. M/S. Lake Palace Hotels and Mo ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2001]251ITR644(Raj); 2001(2)WLN482

..... plant or machinery to become eligible to claim deduction on account of investment allowance subject to fulfilment of other conditions: the supreme court in karnataka power corporation's case (supra) while applying the test that where a building is so planned or constructed as to serve an assessee's special technical requirement, ..... covered by the decision of the supreme court in anand theater's case (supra).(22). the decision in commissioner of income tax vs. karnataka power corporation (supra), is clearly distinguishable inasmuch as installation of plant for thepurposes of business of generation or distribution of electricity or any other form or power has ..... is to be found against allowability of investment allowance under the scheme of the provisions of the act. while claim for depreciation and investment allowance are not mutually exclusive but the claim for investment allowance and development rebate are mutually exclusive, that is to say that where the assessee is entitled to claim .....

Devi Prasad Vs. the Sub-divisional Officer (Land Conversion) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR121]; RLW2004(3)Raj1583; 2004(1)WLC446

..... supreme court turns on its own facts and has no application to the instant case.11. a constitution bench of the hon'ble supreme court, in punjab land development corporation's case (supra), held that compensation in lieu of reinstatement and back wages is, now, the norms and reinstatement is not the inevitable consequence of quashing an ..... hon'ble apex court, while considering the case where termination of services of the workman was made without complying with the provisions of section 25f of the industrial disputes act, the supreme court instead ordered payment of rs. 25,000/- in lieu of reinstatement and back wages, observed as follows:'we find merit in the said submission ..... and back wages though it is well settled that whenever the court finds that retrenchment was in violation of the provisions of section 25f of the i.d. act, the relief of reinstatement with back wages should be allowed.5. learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, has supported the award impugned made by .....

Ram Chandra Kasliwal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1788; 2004(4)WLC17

..... -(1) as soon as may be, after the commencement of this act, the state government shall, by notification in the official gazette, establish for the purposes of this act an authority to be called 'the jaipur development authority' (hereinafter referred to as 'the authority').(2) the authority shall be a body corporate by the name aforesaid, having perpetual succession and a common seal with ..... power, subject to the provision of this act, to acquire, hold and dispose of property, both movable and .....

Grasim Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2002]125STC35(Raj); 2002(1)WLC369; 2001(2)WLN674

..... of m.p. [1997] 106 stc 340. this again turned on the expression used in the schedule of rates provided under the levy of export tax imposed by municipal corporation, katni. the entry read 'all types of cement'. it is to be noticed that the statute itself made it clear that for the purposes of rates it is making ..... made the specific provision in the notification. the notification in question reads :s.o. 23.--in exercise of the powers conferred by section 8(5), central sales tax act, 1956 (central act 74 of 1956), the state government in supersession of the finance department notification no. f4(72)fd/gr./iv/81-36 dated december 3, 1985 [s.no. 584], ..... goods other than watches notwithstanding that 'electronic goods' for the rate purposes may have been classified as one entry in the notification governing the rates of tax under the act in the state. likewise, cement as an adhesive material used in construction is broadly speaking a building material and in the light of such an entry in the .....