Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: faridabad development corporation act 1956 section 1 short title Page 6 of about 52,099 results (0.457 seconds)

Vysya Bank Limited Vs. A.P. State Agro Industries, Development Corpora ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2004AP10; 2003(5)ALD410; 2003(5)ALT815; 2004(1)CTLJ441(AP)

..... the court arrives at the conclusion that no loss is likely to occur because of such breach. the question of paying compensation under section 73 of the indian contract act arises only when there is a contract. the evidence brought on record clearly establishes that there is no privity of contract between the appellant/d-1 and r-1 ..... lessors for liability of lessees is liable to be quashed. in the third cited decision, the supreme court while interpreting sections 10 and 70 of the indian contract act held that the plaintiff-advertiser not being a party to agreement between the financer and the owner of circus is not made liable to the claim of the fmancer. ..... of the executioner, even if there was an intention to create a charge. in the second cited decision, the supreme court while interpreting section 40 of the indian contract act held that where the lessors were not parties to the agreement between the lessees and the state, the lessors cannot be held liable for the business of the lessees. .....

Punjab Drugs Manufacturers Association Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1989P& H117

..... company mentioned against serial no. 6, i.e. m/s. japson pharmaceuticals (punjab) ltd, chandigarh, is a joint sector company in which the punjab state industrial development corporation (for short, the 'psidc') holds 5.0 per cent equity. m/s. medical store depot, karnal mentioned at serial no. 7 is a government undertaking. ..... that the authorities while declaring this company as an approved source have not acted bona fide.21. the policy in this behalf had been changed and amongst others, all the joint sector companies in which the punjab state industrial development corporation held equity of at least 50 per cent and which were manufacturing various ..... quoted by the other approved sources, respondents 4 to 8, which are central government's public sector undertakings were approved for 17 drugs/medicines. haffkin pharmaceutical corporation, bombay, central research institute, kasauli and m.s.d. karnal, who are approved sources, did not send any quotations/tenders and were thus approved for .....

Montari Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1998]94CompCas356(Guj); 1998CriLJ10; (1998)1GLR35

..... count has no force in law and does not require any recognition. 8. as regards the second contention, as held by the supreme court in electronics trade and technology development corporation ltd. v. indian technologists and engineers (electronics) pvt. ltd. [1996] 86 comp cas 30; [1996] 1 jt 643 (sc), it is true that ..... 138 of the act do not get attracted and no criminal prosecution can be initiated. but, with great respect, i say that the apex court has not clarified as to what shall be the nature and contents of such advance intimation. however, relying upon the judgment in electronics trade and technology development corporation ltd. v. indian ..... act, 1985, and section 22 thereof engrafts an express legal bar in continuing any legal proceeding; (ii) before depositing the cheques in the bank by respondent no. 2, the petitioners had already intimated respondent no. 2 not to deposit the cheques and as per ratio laid down in the case of electronics trade and technology development corporation .....

M/S Riteek Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the limitation act, 1963 (in short, the 196. act .) it singh gurbachan 2014.01.27 15:51 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh vatap no.156 of 2013 -3- may be observed that the hon'ble supreme court in oriental aroma chemical industries ltd. v. gujarat industrial development corporation and another, ..... framed the assessment for the year 2003-04 by disallowing the input tax benefit on the basis of instruction issued by the joint excise & taxation commissioner (range), faridabad. feeling aggrieved, the appellant filed an appeal on 18.9.2012 and the first appellate authority vide order dated 18.9.2012 (annexure a-2) rejected ..... discretion on individual facts involved therein. there does not exist any exhaustive list constituting sufficient cause. the applicant/petitioner is required to establish that inspite of acting with due singh gurbachan 2014.01.27 15:51 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh vatap no.156 of 2013 .....

Regional Computer Centre Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2009]311ITR182(P& H)

..... and secretary, irrigation and power, government of punjab, chandigarh, deputy secretary (finance), chandigarh administration, u. t. chandigarh, managing director, punjab state industrial development corporation ltd., chandigarh and three representatives from the state of haryana were to be nominated. on the basis of the aforementioned constitution of the executive council, it has ..... income-tax (appeals) before the tribunal had also urged various other grounds including non-taxability of its income under section 60 of the act, non-allowance of depreciation allowance while computing the total income, treating the interest accrued on grant-in-aid to be a revenue receipt, ..... computer centre, chandigarh (for brevity, 'the assessee rcc'), the instant reference has been made under section 256(1) of the income-tax act, 1961 (for brevity, 'the act'), by the income-tax appellate tribunal, chandigarh bench, chandigarh (for brevity, 'the tribunal'). the tribunal has referred the following questions of .....

Thakkar Dharatiben Haribhai and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2000Guj114; (2000)2GLR1272

..... act is mala fide or in violation of natural justice.26. it is also settled proposition of law that, change in the policy by state does not vitiate the action taken pursuant thereto if the policy is rational and reasonable. i am fortified in my view by the judgment in case of union of india v. hindustan development corporation ..... the statutory authority. in a matter relating to the internal working of the educational institutions and in academic matters courts will not interfere unless that act complained of is clearly beyond the jurisdiction or contrary to the statutory rules or the regulations governing institutions or the constitution, or there is statutory ..... to its standards or qualifications, as the case may be, although the applicant satisfies the standards or qualifications laid down by the central law, they act unconstitutionally. so also when the state authorities de-recognise or disaffiliate an institution for not satisfying the standards or requirement laid down by them, although .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Arasan Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1996]220ITR476(Mad)

..... view taken by the tribunal. we are unable to see any connection between the two amounts. the amount upon which interest was paid to andhra pradesh industrial development corporation limited was raised by way of loan for setting up the plant and the interest income was earned on the contributions made by the shareholders towards the ..... the deposit of paid-up capital is in the nature of income chargeable to tax as income from other sources under section 57 of the income-tax act.6. deductions claimed in respect of investment of paid-up capital and moneys borrowed in call deposits pending utilisation for construction of factory came up for consideration ..... while placing reliance upon the earlier decisions of the tribunal on this point, contended that the interest from deposit was income and, therefore, assessable under section 57 of the act. in view of the decision in addl. cit v. madrasfertilisers ltd. : [1980]122itr139(mad) , no deduction was possible from the income received from the deposit. .....

Virender Yadav Vs. Aerosvit Airlines and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(3)ARBLR445(Delhi); 153(2008)DLT250

..... be referred to arbitration. he relied on the judgment rendered by the punjab & haryana high court in the case of sterling publishers pvt. ltd. v. haryana state industrial development corporation ltd. and anr. reported as to urge that even if the defendant no. 3 is not a party to the agreement, the nature of the dispute between the parties ..... the plaintiff. this dispute which forms the basis of the suit instituted by the plaintiff against the defendants can be resolved through arbitration under section 45 of the act as the same hinges on the interpretation of the agreement dated 20.10.2004. if the arbitral tribunal ultimately arrives at the conclusion that the action of the ..... submitted that the provisions of section 45 cannot be read in isolation and have to be read in conjunction with section 2(b) and section 7(3) of the act which define an arbitration agreement.10. in rebuttal, counsel for the defendants no. 1 & 2 submitted that the objection of the plaintiff to submit itself to the .....

Amarsinhji Stationery Indu. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)3GLR2213

..... act. the question with regard to limitation or lack of jurisdiction can be taken care of by passing necessary directions as the appellate authority can passed order on all the grounds including lack of jurisdiction.7. i am fortified in my view by the decision rendered in the case of (1) uttaranchal forest development corporation ..... bareilly : [1970]78itr26(sc) .(4) dr. smt. kuntesh gupta v. management of hindu kanya mahavidyala, sitapur (u.p.) and ors. : 1987(32)elt8(sc) .(5) whirlpool corporation v. registrar of trade marks, mumbai : air1999sc22 .(6) dahyabhai devjibhai vasava v. dy. dist. dev. officer (rev.) broach 1981 (2) glr 678.(7) madhusudan dharshibhai tank v. m ..... i.d. franchisees' association (gujarat) v. chief general manager, gujarat telecom circle (b.s.n.l. corporation) and ors. : air2005guj141 .(11) division bench judgment dated 17-1-2007 delivered by this court (coram: hon'ble the acting chief justice y.r. meena and hon'ble mr. justice s. dave) in letters patent appeal no. 74 .....

G.L. Modi and Another Vs. Xedd Finance and Investments Pvt., Ltd. and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD365; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)99; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)170

..... pal and another, 1995 (11) ch. 37, and the casein sri prasantha aggarwal v. sri s.k. rai regional manager, electronics and trade development corporation and another, 1997 cal crl.lr 104. in those cases, filed under section 138 of the act, the complainant while issuing the demand notice in compliance of the proviso of section 138 of the ..... 17/97 against the petitioners and respondents 2 to 7 for the offence under section 138 of the act alleging that the 1st accused, company represented by other accused, borrowed a sum of rs.20,00,000/-as inter corporate deposit from the complainant and in discharge of that debt,, the 2nd accused representing the 1st accused-company ..... called as act). it is alleged in the complaint tiiat during the course of business, the 1st accused company represented by other accused borrowed a sum of rs.37.78 lakhs as inter corporate deposit from the complainant and in discharge of that debt together with interest thereon, the 1st accused company represented by a2 who is .....