Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: faridabad development corporation act 1956 section 1 short title Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 52,000 results (0.614 seconds)

Sep 11 2023 (SC)

M/s Rps Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Mukul Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... .08.2006 between the appellant and m/s kst infrastructure private limited (hereinafter referred to as the corporate debtor ), for development of land licensed with the appellant admeasuring 8 acres into a residential group housing complex at faridabad, haryana. however, the appellant, being aggrieved by the corporate debtor s alleged misconduct in advertising the project under its own name and without mentioning the name ..... examined the aforesaid submissions. the only issue before us is whether the appellant s claim pertaining to an arbitral award, which is in appeal under section 37 of the said act, is liable to be included at a belated stage i.e. after the resolution plan has been approved by the coc.17. it is undisputed that the process followed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 07 2022 (SC)

The State Of Haryana Through Secretary To Government Of Haryana Etc.et ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... mr. kamat, learned senior advocate appearing for the appellant argued that the appellant has challenged the provisions of the haryana municipal corporation (amendment) act, 1999 amending the haryana municipal corporation act, 75 199452 but the state has not filed any appeal against the judgment arising out of the writ petition filed by ..... court in suraj bhan struck down the provisions of the amending statutes amending the 1973 municipal act and 52 1994 corporation act 53 1973 municipal act 54 air1980p&h3755 for short, the 1974 act 76 the 1994 corporation act relying upon the full bench decision in rajender parshad. the appellant in civil appeal no.1679 ..... of the sabha area is included in the faridabad complex under the faridabad complex (regulation and development) act, 1971, the gram panchayat shall cease to exist and its assets and liabilities shall vest in the faridabad complex.97. section 2-a of the 1973 municipal act deals with classification and constitution of municipalities such as .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2020 (HC)

M/s Chalet Hotels Limited Vs. M/s Hindustan Aeronautics Limited

Court : Karnataka

..... surfaces called obstacle limitation surfaces (ols) and any penetration of the limiting surfaces 36 endangers safety. the gazette notification dated 14.1.2010 has been developed and promulgated keeping in view the operation at civil aerodromes. at para 2(b) of the gazette notification, it is categorically stated that for defence aerodromes ..... report of having surveyed the site location co-ordinates in wgs-84 (deg min sec) format and site elevation certificate from government body, viz., municipal authority/corporation/etc., undertakings in form 1a and 1b, etc. to be submitted after applying for the noc. 153. in bengaluru, the practice and procedure followed by ..... is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed. it is further contended that the respondent-company is incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its registered office at bangalore and it is the government department and primarily a public sector undertaking 31 coming under the control of department .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2019 (SC)

The Municipal Corporation Faridabad Vs. Modern School Faridabad

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... writ petitions filed by the respondents were dismissed.3. the respondents were allotted the land for the purpose of the school by the haryana urban development authority, faridabad on leasehold basis. the allotment letter issued to dav college managing committee dated 02.05.1986 has been filed as an additional document before this ..... 8. ground that section 87 of the act1 provides for levy of taxes whereas, corporation is empowered to levy fee including development fee for providing and maintaining civic amenities in certain areas in terms of section 88 of the act but after the prior approval of the state government. since no approval has been sought ..... the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.1555 of2019(arising out of s.l.p (c) no.20191 of 2016) the municipal corporation, faridabad ........appellant versus modern school, faridabad & ors. ........respondents with civil appeal no.1556 of2019(arising out of s.l.p (c) no.20193 of 2016) judgment hemant gupta, j .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2019 (HC)

M/S Standard Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... above course of action was open to the government, but ultimately it was decided to exploit the granite through state of andhra pradesh mineral development corporation, it was found that earlier decision of exploitation of granite through private parties cannot come in the way of decision of the state government to exploit and ..... reproduced herein below: the area granted under reference in schedule a of the exploration license deed excludes all areas lying in onshore the offshore area mineral development and regulation act, 2002 does not apply . to which 38. the aforesaid fact further removes any ambiguity over the said issue as a specific condition has been additionally ..... (b) exploration and exploitation of oil and natural gas. (a) mining of atomic minerals notified under part-b of the first schedule of the mining and minerals (development) act, 1957 (67 of 1957) occurring as such or in association with one or other minerals, (b) exploration and exploitation of oil and natural gas.85. it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2018 (HC)

Gyan Prakash (Now Deceased) Thr Lrs vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

..... collector had no other option but to deposit the same in the court under section 31 of the act.36. before parting, i may add that in indore development authority vs. shailendra (2018) 3 scc412 pune municipal corporation supra was held to be per incurium and it was further held i) once there is tender of ..... held to be tender of compensation to the interested persons. this court also in life insurance corporation of india vs. union of india 1998 (47) drj659treated deposit of compensation in court as tender of compensation.34. in delhi development authority vs. sukhbir singh (2016) 16 scc258 pertaining to acquisition of land in the state ..... appellant and thus the question of the appellant coming forward to take the compensation never arises; (iii) supreme court in pune municipal corporation vs. harakchand misrimal solanki air2014sc982has held that the land acquisition act being an expropriatory legislation, has to be strictly followed; thus deposit under section 31(2) of the land acquisition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2018 (SC)

m.c.mehta Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 18th march, 2004 was restricted only to mining activities and did not affect the development or urbanisation or construction activities carried out as per the laws, rules and regulations of the municipal corporation of faridabad or the haryana urban development authority. despite the clear judgment and order passed by this court, the attitude of ..... town planner in the department of town & country planning. it was stated in the affidavit that the development plan for faridabad had been prepared in accordance with the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas restrictions of unregulated development act, 1963 and the final 11 w.p. no.4677 of 1985 ias. 2310/2008 etc. in ..... of the notification 125. reliance was then placed on the provisions of sub-section (1) and sub-section (7) of section 29 of the faridabad complex (regulation and development) act, 1971 to submit that the notification dated 18th august, 1992 was not applicable to controlled areas. these provisions read as follows: section 29 - .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2018 (HC)

Kavita vs.indian Oil Corporation Limited & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... as events evolved in 2007, ibp merged with iocl. the record shows that iocl was unable to hand over a developed site for running a retail outlet to the petitioner and other similarly circumstanced applicants. however, interestingly, iocl kept the lois ..... on:14. 8.2018 kavita through : mr. gaurang kanth, mrs. biji rajesh and ms. eshita baruah, advs. ........ petitioner versus indian oil corporation limited & anr through : ms. meenakshi arora, sr. adv. with and ms. ms. mala narayan madhumanti ghose, advs. for r-1. ..... 2 respondent no.2 filed his application with ibp for award of dealership of a retail outlet at ballabhgarh city (wml), faridabad (district), haryana. 3.3 in the usual course, both respondent no.2 and the petitioner were invited for interviews ..... 7 perhaps exasperated with the delay, on 28.9.2011, the petitioner took recourse to the right to information act, 2005 (in short rti act ) by preferring an application in that behalf, whereby she chose to raise a query with regard to lois .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2018 (HC)

M/S Ramky Infrastructure Private Limited vs.micro and Small Enterpris ...

Court : Delhi

..... read to comprise of four categories: (i) micro or small enterprises that have filed the memorandum under section 8(1) of the act; (ii) national small industries corporation; (iii) small industries development corporation of a state or a union territory; and (iv) a company co-operative society, trust or a body engaged in selling goods ..... which has filed a memorandum with the authority referred to in sub-section (1) of section 8 of the act and the second limb refers to (i) national small industries corporation; (ii) the small industries development corporation of a state or a union territory; and (iii) a company, co-operative society, trust or a body ..... authority referred to in sub-section (1) of section 8, and includes. (i) (ii) (iii) the national small industries corporation, being a company, registered under the companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956); the small industries development corporation of a state or a union territory, by whatever name called, being a company registered under the companies .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2018 (SC)

Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. Vs. M/S Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... any weight. the view taken in m.d. frozen foods is that the sarfaesi act is retroactive in nature. in the process, the court approved the full bench decision of the orissa high court in sarthak builders pvt. ltd., chinta, arunodaya market, cuttack & another v. orissa rural development corporation limited, station square, bhubaneswar & 5 ors.11 and made the following observations: 38 in ..... bench of the orissa high court in sarthak builders pvt. ltd. v. orissa rural development corporation limited (supra) has, in fact, succinctly sets out this aspect. no doubt, till the respondent was not a financial institution within the meaning of section 2(1)(m)(iv) of the sarfaesi act, it was not a secured creditor as defined under section 2(1)(zd) of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //