Factor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: factor Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 308 results (0.155 seconds)Ring Vs. Arizona
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
..... doubt that concurring in judgment t he sixth amendment permits judges to apply sentencing factors whether those factors lead to a sentence beyond the statutory maximum as in apprendi or the application ..... whether or not the states have been erroneously coerced into the adoption of aggravating factors wherever those factors exist they must be subject to the usual requirements of the common law and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarris Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
..... castillo v united states supra the court singled out brandishing as a paradigmatic sentencing factor traditional sentencing factors often involve special features of the manner in which a basic crime was carried ..... time i continue to believe that the sixth amendment permits judges to apply sentencing factors whether those factors lead to a sentence beyond the statutory maximum as in apprendi or the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNb Jaffar Ali Khan Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-20-2002
Reported in: (2003)87ITD359(Hyd.)
..... 127 itr 549 wherein certain deductions were allowed considering the pending litigations and such other factors and held that in principle a deduction for risks and hazards was allowable he however ..... however such judgment should be based on objective considerations in the present case the relevant factors have been copiously stated in the preceding paragraphs and an honest attempt is made with .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKensigton Investment Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-11-2002
..... a conclusion as to reasonableness by considering the two matters mentioned isolated from other relevant factors moreover the statute does not say having regard only to losses previously incurred by ..... of offence despite the section directs the adjudicating officer to have due regard to the factors stated therein that the section though presumes default still cautions the adjudicating officer on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShree Balaji Re-rollers Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Nov-29-2002
Reported in: (2003)(87)ECC18
..... to verify the parameters of the mill with regard to d factor 2 during the de novo adjudication verification was conducted and it ..... represented by shri b n chattopadhyay learned consultant is that the d factor has been given in the hot re rolling steel mills annual ..... re rolling steel mills annual capacity determination rules 1997 the d factor is to be taken as pinion center distance of pinion stand .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtkins Vs. Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
..... as amici curiae appending approximately 20 state and national polls on the issue although these factors are by no means dispositive their consistency with the legislative evidence lends further support ..... showing of mitigation in the face of prosecutorial evidence of one or more aggravating factors mentally retarded defendants may be less able to give meaningful assistance to their counsel .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVoltas Employees Union Vs. Voltas Ltd. and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-20-2002
Reported in: 2003(3)BomCR533; [2002(93)FLR731]; (2003)IILLJ31Bom
..... the interest of the general public and all other relevant factors according to the learned counsel the tribunal has completely misdirected ..... the interest of the general public and all other relevant factors after such an enquiry the appropriate government is required to ..... must also bear in mind public interest and other relevant factors while deciding a closure application the award of the tribunal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRush Prudential Hmo, Inc. Vs. Moran
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
..... 41 50 it then tests the results of the commonsense enquiry by employing the three factors used to point to insurance laws spared from federal preemption under the mccarran ferguson ..... the insurance industry and an insurance regulation under a commonsense view b the mccarran ferguson factors confirm our conclusion a law regulating insurance for mccarran ferguson purposes targets practices or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTahoe-sierra Preservation Council, Inc. Vs. Tahoe Regional Planning Ag ...
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-23-2002
..... into seven land capability districts based largely on steepness but also taking into consideration other factors affecting runoff each district was assigned a land coverage coefficient a recommended limit on ..... se rules in our cases involving partial regulatory takings preferring to examine a number of factors rather than a simple mathematically precise formula 23 justice brennan s opinion for the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGopal Mills Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2002
Reported in: (2002)LC225Tri(Delhi)
..... accepted in accordance with the report of the chartered engineer that d factor of pinion stand being 405 is not maintainable in view of ..... central excise officers on visit of the appellant s factory premises verified factor d of both the rolling mills in the presence of shri ..... carried out by the preservative staff and the measurement of d factor of mill b done by the foreman and the statement of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial