Factor - Judgment Search Results

Walton Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... aggravating circumstance as properly defined or the court may eliminate consideration of the factor altogether and determine whether any remaining aggravating circumstances are sufficient to warrant the ..... moderate impairment presumably the arizona supreme court would respond that no such mitigating factor is recognized under arizona law in prior decisions indicating that certain proffered evidence .....

Mckoy Vs. North Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to find a mitigating circumstance under issue two moreover requiring unanimity on mitigating factors is not constitutional merely because the state also requires unanimity on aggravating circumstances ..... juror might have interpreted the instructions as precluding his consideration of any mitigating factor not found unanimously would have been wholly lacking in constitutional significance if such .....

Lewis Vs. Jeffers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... period during which the knapp definitions had governed the application of this aggravating factor since gretzler moreover the arizona supreme court has continued to identify additional circumstances ..... s 794 this case footnote 2 9 since the statutory language defining these factors does not provide constitutionally adequate guidance the constitutionality of the aggravating circumstances necessarily .....

Clemons Vs. Mississippi

Court: US Supreme Court

..... court properly performed a weighing function either by disregarding entirely the especially heinous factor and weighing only the remaining aggravating circumstance against the mitigating evidence or by ..... court did perform a weighing function either by disregarding entirely the especially heinous factor and weighing only the remaining aggravating circumstance against the mitigating evidence or by .....

Boyde Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... propensities of the offender footnote 2 7 indeed at least seven of the ten factors preceding factor k factors a d e f g h and j relate solely to circumstances surrounding ..... the majority finds no objectionable prosecutorial argument that would reinforce an impermissible interpretation of factor k although the prosecutor never suggested that the background and character evidence could not .....

Wealth-Tax Officer Vs. Trustees Of Heh the Nizam'S

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (1990)35ITD402(Hyd.)

..... rangabhashyam s argument was that the valuation by shri chowlera was done after considering the factors like uncertainties hazards and risks of litigation though it is not clearly discernible from ..... l permission and other formalities 65 shri rangabhashyam tried to demonstrate before us various mitigating factors in relation to the constraints discussed by the learned counsel for the assessee it was .....

Duncans Agro Industries Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1990]33ITD61(Delhi); (1990)37TTJ(Del)480

..... find as a fact as to what are the plus factors and minus factors in the said property the valuation has to be ..... would do we may illustrate some such illustrative not exhaustive factors plus factors minus factors1 smallness of size 1 largeness of area2 proximity ..... by several persons who vacated the same after receiving compensation this factor should have had affected the valuation 35 we have thus .....

Saffle Vs. Parks

Court: US Supreme Court

..... determine you must avoid any influence of sympathy sentiment passion prejudice or other arbitrary factor when imposing sentence you should discharge your duties as jurors impartially conscientiously and ..... the issue the issue is not whether unbridled sympathy itself is a proper mitigating factor rather the issue is whether an absolute antisympathy instruction presents an impermissible danger .....

Blystone Vs. Pennsylvania

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that the sentencer in capital cases must be permitted to consider any relevant mitigating factor the rule recognizes that a consistency produced by ignoring individual differences is a false ..... legislature has determined what constitutes mitigating circumstances and proceeded to list the statutory mitigating factors app at 16 when pressed further for a definition of the last mitigating circumstance .....

Metro Broadcasting Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... ownership and participation in management which is weighed together with all other relevant factors in comparing mutually exclusive applications for licenses for new radio or television broadcast ..... minority ownership policy first the commission pledged to consider minority ownership as one factor in comparative proceedings for new licenses when the commission compares mutually exclusive applications .....