Factor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: factor Sorted by: recent Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 3,378 results (0.06 seconds)Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-31-2002
Reported in: (2004)90ITD153(Mum.)
..... the scheme the quantum of incentive or the period of eligibility is not a determining factor to decide whether the incentive given is of the nature of subsidy true purport of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shiv Dutt Sharma
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-31-2002
Reported in: 2004ACJ2049
..... nature its conditions its obligations and its incidents if by reason of any of those factors the workman is brought within the zone of special danger the injury would be one ..... placed on record the age of the deceased was 40 years taking into consideration these factors and the provisions contained in section 163a of the motor vehicles act the compensation has .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Tiruvalluvar Transpor ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-31-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)CTC156; (2003)1MLJ323
rs 70 000 on 5 7 1979 from jayam ginning factory at theni by the second respondent s lorry to be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarbans Lal Vs. Amar Nath
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-31-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)JKJ355
..... landlord has grown and that the fact that the landlord required additional accommodation was a factor which was taken note ultimately it was observed that the landlord can seek eviction 17 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of J. and K. Vs. Zarina Begum and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-31-2002
Reported in: 2004ACJ2150,AIR2004J& K23
..... deceased was working as a mason and used to earn rs 150 per day this factor was rightly taken note of thereafter unit system was applied and ultimately multiplier of 12 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rakesh Kumar and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-31-2002
Reported in: 2003ACJ1008
..... was rs 8 062 2 on the basis of the aforementioned factors and after hearing the counsel for the parties the tribunal allowed ..... subedar in the army gets free ration and other facilities these factors were never projected and taken note of while computing the income ..... claimant would be missing so many amenities of life and these factors have been taken note of by the tribunal therefore the compensation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Tiruvalluvar Transport Corpora ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-31-2002
Reported in: I(2003)ACC553; 2004ACJ801
rs 70 000 on 05 07 1979 from jayam ginning factory at theni by the second respondent s lorry to be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Sanitaryware and Inds. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Dec-31-2002
Reported in: (2003)(157)ELT108Tri(Bang.)
prices these sale prices were lower compared to the ex factory price for dealers who bought from hyderabad the learned consultant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Tanfac Industries Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Dec-31-2002
Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT129Tri(Chennai)
concerned so long as the inputs are manufactured in the factory and consumed in the manufacture of dutiable final product exemption
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjit India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-31-2002
Reported in: (2003)(161)ELT210Tri(Mum.)bai
and window frames of aluminium that it manufactured at its factory and cleared on payment of duty these activities are stated
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial