Factor - Judgment Search Results

S. Madhava Vs. Canbank Factors Ltd. and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: III(2003)BC123; [2003]114CompCas703(Kar); 2003CriLJ2568; 2003(5)KarLJ108

k sreedhar rao j 1 all these petitions are considered together for passing a common order since a common question...

A.S. Baskaran, Proprietor of Sri Amman Leathers Vs. Indian Finance and ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2004Mad54; I(2004)BC256; 2003(4)CTC218

orderc nagappan j 1 1 in application no 3150 of 2003 the applicant has sought for revoking the leave granted...

Grutter Vs. Bollinger

Court: US Supreme Court

..... gratz v bollinger ante p 244 distinguished also the program adequately ensures that all factors that may contribute to diversity are meaningfully considered alongside race moreover the law school ..... in bakke the law school s race conscious admissions program adequately ensures that all factors that may contribute to student body diversity are meaningfully considered alongside race in admissions .....

Desert Palace, Inc. Vs. Costa

Court: US Supreme Court

..... instruction claiming that respondent had not adduced direct evidence that sex was a motivating factor in petitioner s decision the jury awarded respondent backpay and compensatory and punitive ..... applied only where a disparate treatment plaintiff demonstrated by direct evidence that an illegitimate factor played a substantial role in an adverse employment decision price waterhouse v hopkins 490 .....

Coimbatore Stock Exchange Ltd., Rep. by Its Director, Stock Exchange B ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2003(4)CTC385; (2003)3MLJ672

..... account the approved differential tariff without showing undue preference on the basis of load factor power factor total consumption of energy during any specified period or the time at which supply ..... norm fixed for progressively moving towards cost of supply the differential tariff is permissible on factors set out and consequential fixation over and above the average cost for certain consumers .....

Gratz Vs. Bollinger

Court: US Supreme Court

..... according to grade point average combined with what were referred to as the scuga factors these factors included the quality of an applicant s high school s the strength of an ..... the lsa including freshman and transfer applicants the transfer applicant guidelines specifically cross reference factors and qualifications considered in assessing freshman applicants in fact the criteria used to determine .....

Kentucky Assn. of Health Plans, Inc. Vs. Miller

Court: US Supreme Court

..... does not spread the policyholder s risk within the meaning of the first mccarran ferguson factor our test requires only that the state law substantially affect the risk pooling arrangement between ..... an essential component of the 1144 b 2 a inquiry metropolitan life initially used these factors only to buttress its previously reached conclusion that massachusetts mandated benefit statute was a law .....

Georgia Vs. Ashcroft

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in the very racial stereotyping the fourteenth amendment forbids by making race the predominant overriding factor explaining georgia s congressional districting decisions 515 u s at 928 920 and even though ..... of the opportunities minority voters enjoy to participate in the political processes is an important factor to consider in assessing a 2 vote dilution inquiry see also thornburg v gingles supra .....

Ewing Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... nature of our federal system and the requirement that proportionality review be guided by objective factors inform the final principle that the eighth amendment does not require strict propor 12 ..... nature of our federal system and the requirement that proportionality review be guided by objective factors that inform the final one the eighth amendment does not require strict proportionality between .....

Smith Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... light of the nonpunitive objective the act meets this standard the two remaining mendoza martinez factors whether the regulation comes into play only on a finding of scienter and whether ..... reporting provisions are comparable to conditions of supervised release or parole its ithe mendoza martinez factors include w hether the sanction involves an affirmative disability or restraint whether it has .....