Factor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: factor Year: 1963 Page 1 of about 316 results (0.023 seconds)Motor and Machinery Manufacturers Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal and or ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-14-1963
Reported in: AIR1964Cal262
appeal turns on the interpretation of section 52 of the factories act 1948 it will be convenient to set out the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.K. Jaganani Vs. the State Through the Chief Inspector of Factories
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-27-1963
Reported in: 1964CriLJ697
1948 hereinafter reterred to as the actj the inspector of factories eerie on ixia decembe 1961 inspected the said factory and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBasti Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ram Ujagar and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-04-1963
Reported in: AIR1964SC355; [1963(7)FLR253]; (1963)IILLJ447SC; [1964]2SCR838
can not include persons employed by a contractor of the factory he points out that this definition of workmen in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEast India Industries (Madras) Private Ltd. Vs. the Regional Provident ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-1963
Reported in: (1964)1MLJ441
that it would apply to every establishment which is a factory engaged in any industry specified in schedule i and in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Kanyaka Parameswari Salt Works Chatamatta Represented by Sri K. Ve ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-1963
Reported in: AIR1964AP232; 1964CriLJ513; [1964(9)FLR388]
pointed out that the salt pans in question are not factories and that consequently none of the provisions of the factories
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTL. Shiv Dayal Kapoor and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), New Delhi and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-21-1963
Reported in: AIR1963P& H538
sum of rs 4 200 on accountof use of the factory at the rate of rs 30 penday per saw when
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Thiagarajan Chettiar Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation thr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-10-1963
Reported in: AIR1963Mad361; [1963(7)FLR169]; (1963)IILLJ207Mad; (1963)2MLJ77
maintains a garden evidently for the purpose of keeping the factory in healthy surroundings there can be little doubt that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoara Sugar Mills Private Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-1963
Reported in: AIR1964MP118
on the entry of sugarcane into the premises of a factory on the ground that the legislation did not fall within
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHind Timber Industries and Anr. Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corpora ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-20-1963
Reported in: AIR1963P& H426; (1964)ILLJ669P& H
over to the contractors for preparing the cases outside the factory he conceded that no account was kept of the wooden
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Gujarat Vs. V.L. Vakharia
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-22-1963
Reported in: AIR1964Guj125; 1964CriLJ666; [1966(12)FLR343]; (1964)10GLR29
present appeal by the state 2 section 106 of the factories act provides that no court shall take cognisance of any
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial