Factor - Judgment Search Results

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. Vs. Glenn

Court: US Supreme Court

..... following comments e l precisely elaborate upon how some of those factors factor 1 extent of discretion see comment j factor 4 existence of an external standard for judging reasonableness see comment ..... the best interest of the beneficiary might have chosen gradating reasonableness and making it a factor in the improper motive determination would have the precise effect of eliminating the discretion .....

Bari Brahmana Industries Asso and anr. Vs. Power Development Deptt., a ...

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2008(3)JKJ464

..... preference to any consumer of electricity but may differentiate according to the consumers load factor power factor total consumption of energy during any specified period or the time at which the ..... energy generating resources of the utility it carries wide scale ramification towards cost related factors for securing effective energy output all the available data has been adequately and deeply .....

R (on the Application of Bancoult) (Respondent) Vs. Secretary of State ...

Court: House of Lords

..... replacement occupations was extremely doubtful the wisdom of settling in the atolls given the ecological factors now pertaining was questionable looming over all considerations were the twin issues of prohibitive ..... between procedural and substantive expectations but noted that proportionality itself involved an assessment of factors such as those included in mr underwood qc 8217 s list para 69 182 .....

Powerlinks Transmission Limited Vs. Power Grid Corporation of India

Court: Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC

..... up pre tax on transmission charges shall be allowed as transmission majoration factor provided that transmission majoration factor shall not be allowed on hvdc projects executed through iptc jv ..... transmission lines the commission has mentioned a concept designated as transmission majoration factor introduction of this factor is in due consideration of the fact that the commission recognises the .....

Meacham Vs. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory

Court: US Supreme Court

..... than a reasonableness test in assessing the employer s reliance on factors other than age in the layoff decisions and because meacham ..... assigning the burden of persuasion on the reasonableness of the factor other than age the court of appeals in this case ..... s general counsel the commission takes the position that the reasonable factor other than age provision is an affirmative defense on which .....

Boumediene Vs. Bush

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of holding the suspension clause applicable in a case of military detention abroad these factors are not dispositive because the government presents no credible arguments that the military mission ..... insular cases eisentrager and reid the idea that questions of extraterritoriality turn on objective factors and practical concerns not formalism b the government s formal sovereignty based test raises .....

Sony India (P) Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

..... required to deal with outsiders maintain quality control and carry negotiations for all the above factors risk was involved for which comparables were getting returns therefore adjustments were necessary for ..... allow deduction at 20 for various differences on account of intangibles research and development risk factors working capital etc etc against 10 allowed by the learned cit appeals this ground .....

Republic of Philippines Vs. Pimentel

Court: US Supreme Court

..... be dismissed the joinder issue can be complex and the case specific determinations involve multiple factors some substantive some procedural some compelling by themselves and some subject to balancing against ..... where joinder is not feasible the question whether the action should proceed turns on the factors outlined in subdivision b the considerations set forth in subdivision b are nonexclusive as .....

Maharashtra State Power Vs. Maharastra Electricity

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... considerations while determining the allowable shr level hence a comparison without considering all the factors leading to determination of allowable shr for a particular station is neither meaningful nor ..... reactive power management compensation thereof upon careful deliberation and taking into account state specific factors 91 in our opinion if the appellant is required to extend support for .....

Taylor Vs. Sturgell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... but not sufficient for virtual representation in addition at least one of three other factors must be established a close relationship between the present party and his putative representative ..... things considered balancing approach might spark wide ranging time consuming and expensive discovery tracking factors potentially relevant under seven or five prong tests and after the relevant facts are .....