Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2006 Page 91 of about 5,300 results (0.190 seconds)

Mar 03 2006 (HC)

Syed Saleema Bee Vs. Syed Noorjahan and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD721; 2006(2)ALT637

..... fact that the defendant or defendants do not reside at the place where the plaintiff resides, a suit can be instituted at a place where the plaintiff resides. section 20 of c.p.c., has three clauses. clauses (a) and (b) speaks of respondents or defendants whereas clause (c) speaks of cause of action ..... personal officer, south central railway, is situated at renigunta and therefore the suit at tirupati is maintainable.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner strenuously relies on section 20 of c.p.c., and submits that syed hussain, a native of nagireddipalle married at nagireddipalle, that the headquarters of second respondent is situated at ..... section 15 lays down that 'every suit shall be instituted in the court of the lowest grade competent to try it'. the ordinary jurisdiction of each subordinate court - district court, senior civil judge court and junior civil judge court; is decided by the legislature, which, in the case of state of andhra pradesh, is a.p. civil courts (amendment) act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (TRI)

Satyam Cineplexes Vs. Mark Paul

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

..... maximum retail price printed thereon is concerned it definitely falls within the arena of consumer protection law and has no relevance or relationship with the provisions of weights and measurement act and rules made thereunder. in latters case action taking authority is the government whereas in the formers case the customer or consumer dominates the litigation i.e., action against the ..... the core activity as the sale for such item is one of the services rendered by the cineplex, hotels and restaurants and also that the provisions of weights and measures act are not applicable. some of the observations made by us in this regard are as under: so far as the sale of any article for a price more than the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (HC)

Musliarakath Abdulla Vs. Abdul Azeea Naha

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT228

..... raised by the learned counsel for the appellant.point no. 27. the learned counsel for the appellant contended that the agreement itself is invalid in view of section 23 of the contract act and the same was unenforceable in law. according to the learned counsel, the car brought to india was a new car and only persons who own a ..... of the plaintiff that he spent the entire amount for import of the car was not proved, (2) that such an agreement was unenforceable in law under section 23 of the contract act, and (3) that the suit itself was barred by limitation as the plaintiff filed the suit three years after the amount were alleged to have been paid ..... getting clearance from the customs department and for other incidental matters. the entire amount was not received by the defendant from the plaintiff. therefore, article 24 of the limitation act has no application. if article 24 has no application, it is not in dispute that article 113 will apply in which case the suit was filed within time as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (HC)

Vishwanath S/O Parshuram Kuduchkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR531; 2006(3)MhLj817

..... express payment of rs. 9.08 lakhs to the contractors. on the basis of evidence, the inquiry officer found that the docket vouchers were not routed through the technical section for scrutiny. the claims were not verified. there can be one or two instances of overwriting, erasers etc. in the year. in this case, however, there were ..... the matter leniently. misconduct in such cases has to be dealt with iron hands. where a person deals with public money or is engaged in financial transactions or acts in a fiduciary capacity, the highest degree of integrity and trustworthiness is a must and unexceptionable.' in this view of the matter, we are not inclined to interfere ..... or dishonesty in connection with the affairs of the board. (as per sr. no. 14 of schedule 'b' appended to the mseb employees' service regulations no. 86(3). * act of disloyalty to the board. as per sr. no. 15 of schedule 'b' appended to mseb employees service regulation no. 86(3). * breach of rules, regulations, circulars, orders .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (HC)

Smt. Vijaya W/O Balasaheb Kulkarni and ors. Vs. Smt. Rukhmini Bai W/O ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Reported in : 2007ACJ515

..... , marked in evidence as ex.p5 - fir and complaint, ex.p4 -mvi report and ex.p2 - spot panchanama, the tribunal concluded with certainty that such evidence establishes rash and negligent act of the driver of the offending vehicle and consequently fastened actionable wrong upon him. the tribunal noticed that despite grant of opportunity to resist the accusation and allegation of rashness .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (HC)

Hathising Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Reported in : 2006(203)ELT394(Guj)

K.A. Puj, J.1. Rule. Mr. Jitendra Malkan, learned Assistant Solicitor General waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1.2. Since the issue involved in this petition is in very narrow compass, the matter is taken up for final hearing.3. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing and setting aside the order dated 24-9-2004 passed by CESTAT, Mumbai.4. It is the case of the petitioner that as the credit of duties paid on inputs used in relation to the manufacture of yams sold under exemption to Regd. Co-operative Societies in plain reel hanks would not be available, the petitioner company did not avail credit of duties paid on these quantities of fibres which were used in relation to yarns cleared under the above exemption and also maintained accounts of such transactions. A show cause notice was issued proposing to recover amount of Rs. 6,83,313/- on the ground that the petitioner company has taken this amount as c...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (TRI)

Association of Unified Telecom Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Through

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Reported in : (2006)5CompLJ363TelecomDSAT

..... to technical reasons bsnl chandigarh is forced to withdraw the space allotted vide above said letter to m/s reliance communication pvt ltd, in both the places, i.e., sec-17 and sec-34 chandigarh. the money deposited against the demand note for the same will be adjusted in the bsnl cable/duct damages to be recovered from m/s reliance.14 ..... the members of the petitioner association were the erstwhile private basic service operators (bsos) before migrating to the uasl regime.3. the respondent is a company registered under the companies act and is a wholly owned government of india enterprise. the respondent has license to provide all types of services of telecommunication. the respondent was originally a part of the government ..... 1. the present petition is filed under section 14(a) of trai act, 1997 challenging various orders, the demand notices threatening disconnection of the points of interconnect (pois) of the member service providers of the petitioner association in the event of failure to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (TRI)

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Raj Kumar Agarwal [Alongwith Ita

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Reported in : (2006)102TTJ(Jodh.)991

..... has been held so in cit v. vinod danchand ghodawat and cit v. khushlal chand mrmal kumar . the later decision was rendered after considering the amendment in section 158bb by finance act, 2002 with retrospective effect from 1st july, 1995.there is no dearth of the orders passed by the tribunal deleting the additions made only on the basis of ..... of any material found during the course of search, is part of regular assessment and is beyond the ken of block assessment. the definition of undisclosed income as given in section 158b(b) is categoric and does not include such type of additions within its sweep. we, therefore, uphold the impugned order on this score.7. ground no. 3 ..... against the levy of surcharge.15. it is noticed that the search was conducted on 31st oct., 2000.proviso to section 1 13 mandating the levy of surcharge on tax in the case of block assessment cases was inserted by finance act, 2002 w.e.f.1st june, 2002, its operation has not been made retrospective in any manner. hence .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Modern Coal Company

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Reported in : (2006)103TTJ(Asr.)726

..... recorded any finding that introduction of this amount in the name of the partner was a device for canalising unaccounted income of the firm. now as per provisions of section 68 of the act, the addition in respect of unexplained credit could be made if the assessee is unable to explain the source of the credit or the explanation given is not ..... the sum and substance of the ratio of these decisions is that merely because the additions have been upheld does not ipso facto attract levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the act. the very expression of concealment implies that it must show mala fide intent on the part of the assessee to hide or suppress his income with a ..... that the assessee concealed the particulars of income to the tune of rs. 2,08,676 and accordingly imposed a penalty of rs. 1,10,566 under section 271(1)(c) of the act.3. being aggrieved, the assessee impugned the levy of penalty in appeal before the cit(a). the submissions made before the ao were reiterated.relying on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2006 (TRI)

Star India Private Limited Vs. Asianet Satellite

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

..... as regards the 2nd period, asianet received signals, which were voluntarily given by star india and since no agreement covered such period, the principle of section 70 of the contract act would apply i.e. a reasonable compensation for services received, which would be based on market rate which would be the price paid by others for ..... clause goes and the respondent cannot rely upon the subscription clause in the agreement for purposes of arriving at amounts payable. in such a case, section 70 of the contract act will come into play for determining the amount payable for benefits/services received under the void contract, as has been held by the hon'ble supreme ..... other by the broadcasters and provided signals at reasonable conditions and based on parity as incorporated in regulation 3.2 of the interconnection regulations, 2004. section 70 of the contract act, also provides that the market price is payable, and on the basis of the evidence led by the parties, from the period of the agreement .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //