Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2006 Page 95 of about 5,300 results (0.412 seconds)

Mar 07 2006 (TRI)

Dharni Dhar Vs. Air Mauritius and Others

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

..... alternative route op no. 1 did not do the needful. 22. deficiency in service for the purpose of compensating the consumer under the provisions of section 2(1)(g) of consumer protection act, 1986 means any fault, imperfection, shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality, nature and manner of performance which is required to be maintained by or under ..... of complimentary ticket without being charged any consideration therefor, and therefore he does not fall within the definition of consumer as defined by section 2(1)(d)(ii) of consumer protection act 1986. relevant abstract of section 2(1)(d)(ii) reads as under : consumer means a person who hires or avails any services for a consideration which has ..... party no. 1 air mauritius has come up with the following pleas : (i) that the complainant is not a consumer within the meaning of section 2(1)(d) of the consumer protection act, as he did not pay any consideration for the ticket on which he travelled as it was a free ticket and this fact had been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2006 (HC)

T. Kumar Babu Vs. Gireesh Sanghi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)967; 2006CriLJ2839

..... the accused alleged to have collected or intended to collect funds for gujarat victims. in the absence of any allegation that the accused/respondents 1 to 3 were acting as the persons mentioned under section 409, i.p.c., it is not possible to accept the same as it is. hence, the court has no hesitation to hold that the said ..... lie upon the person so aware; forthwith give information to the nearest magistrate or police officer of such commission or intention.(2) for the purpose of this section, the term 'offence' includes any act committed at any place out of india which would constitute an offence if committed in india.7. now, it is necessary for this court to look into ..... the allegations made in the complaint and the provisions of section 39, cr. p.c. from a perusal of the complaint as excerpted above, it is clear that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2006 (HC)

Mukeem Ullah Son of Late Sri Naim Ullah, Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Th ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2606

..... second f.i.r. against the petitioners. in these circumstances, no question arises regarding the double jeopardy. now the investigating officer has to file the police report under section 173(2) cr.p.c. against the rest petitioners after completion of the investigation. therefore, the proceeding is also not pending before the court prior to file the ..... quashed by sessions judge-no investigation thereby commenced-subsequent f.i.r. lodged on basis of information received about cognizable offence-there is no question of any bar under section 162-moreso, when fir disclosed prima facie case for commencing investigation.18. it has also been observed in anurag tripathi v. state of u.p. and anr. ..... 307 and 302 i.p.c., p.s. mau aima, district allahabad and case crime no. c-35 of 2005, under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 308, 203 i.p.c. and under section 3(2) v sc/st act, p.s. malwan, district fatehpur and stay the arrest of the petitioners.2. affidavit and supplementary affidavit on behalf of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2006 (HC)

Sukhbeer Kaur and ors. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

Reported in : I(2007)ACC433; 2008ACJ1094

a.m. sapre, j.1. this is an appeal filed by the claimants under section 173 of the motor vehicles act against an award, dated 12th april, 2005, passed by learned 3rd additional member, motor accident claims tribunal. facts of the case are these:on 15th december, 2002, sukhdev, aged 48 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2006 (HC)

Countryside Builders and Developers and ors. Vs. Rajesh Kumar Bansal a ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

Reported in : 2006(3)ShimLC346

..... the learned single judge dismissed both the aforesaid applications after rejecting the prayer of the appellants that the court should, in terms of section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (1996 act, for short) refer the parties to arbitration.2. brief facts leading to the filing of the appeal may be summarized as under.3 ..... arbitration agreement and the arbitrality of the subject-matter of the suit therefore, are conditions precedent for passing an order by such a court under section 8 of the 1996 act for referring the parties to the arbitration. if there is no arbitration agreement between the parties or if, despite existence of the arbitration agreement ..... shall not be ousted. for instance, in so far as it relates to the scope of 1996 act or any purpose connected therewith, say section 9 or for that matter even section 8, section 34, sections 6 and 37 of the 1996 act etc. etc. whatever meaning is assigned to the aforesaid expression occurring in clause 12, this expression .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2006 (TRI)

A.P. Power Generation Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

Reported in : (2007)105ITD423(Hyd.)

..... , the question of they being brought to india in knocked down condition does not arise.the question of assembling or erection also does not arise. section 44bbb of the act applies only in so far as local service contract for installation of these cables is concerned. m/s. sumitomo corporation estimated the income from such ..... was liable to deduct tax as it had not approached the assessing officer. the commissioner (appeals) rejected the contention of the assessee that provisions of section 195 of the act did not apply on the ground that there was constructive payment in favour of sumitomo corporation. he then considered the provisions of double taxation avoidance agreement ..... neither a payment by the appellant nor a credit to sumitomo corporation in the books of accounts of the appellant as would attract the provisions of section 195 of the act. v) the acit ought to have appreciated that in substance, the payment made by the sumitomo corporation was as per the instructions of government of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2006 (HC)

P. Mallaiah Vs. Government of A.P. Rep. by Secretary, Irrigation and C ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-08-2006

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD148; 2006(2)ALT742

..... gazette, dated 25-11-1991. therefore, the petitioner's land was never proposed for acquisition by duly declaring the intention by way of declaration under section 6 of the act. the petitioner is claiming compensation for government land, which was assigned in 1969 and which submerged in the tank. as per the orders of the ..... second respondent submitted draft declaration limiting acquisition to patta land admeasuring ac.83.14 gts. but, the government requested to send draft errata for notification under section 4(1) of the act approved earlier and accordingly, a revised draft notification was submitted for acquiring land admeasuring ac.83.14 gts. the land of the petitioner was not ..... name of the petitioner is mentioned as occupier of the land in survey no. 441/33 situated at burgampad village. after publication of notification under section 4(1) of the act, the land was surveyed by the assistant director of survey and land records. as per the survey, the patta land under the alignment is ac .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2006 (HC)

Dr. Prem Bhatnagar Vs. Shri Ravi Mohan Bhatnagar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-08-2006

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ346

..... referred to by learned counsel for the contesting defendants is commissioner of wealth-tax, kanpur v. chander sen : [1986]161itr370(sc) . the effect of section 8 of the said act was discussed. section 8 is as under:8. general rules of succession in the case of males. - the property of a male hindu dying intestate shall devolve according to the ..... vis son and female heirs with respect to whom no such concept could be applied or contemplated. it may be mentioned that heirs in class i of schedule under section 8 of the act included widow, mother, daughter of predeceased son etc. 30. the second judgment referred to is of yudhishter v. ashok kumar : [1987]1scr516 . it was held ..... . the facts are somewhat apposite and thus can be discussed. the self-acquired property after the death of the deceased was inherited by six heirs under section 8 of the said act in equal share. the remaining five legal heirs of the deceased released and relinquished their 1/6th share in favor of defendant no. 1 in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2006 (HC)

Peddi Kumara Swamy @ Muthyala Kumara Swamy and ors. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-08-2006

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)767; I(2007)DMC373

..... if the entire evidence is accepted, there is no case against a-2 to a-4 and thus their convictions and sentences for the offences under section 498a, ipc and section 4 d.p. act are unsustainable and accordingly they are liable to be acquitted of the same. his further submission is that the statement made by the deceased to p ..... according to him, the accused had asked his wife that is the deceased, to demand money from him. again the evidence is not admissible under section 32 of the evidence act. therefore, conviction under section 498a, i pc also cannot sustain and is set aside.in the second cited decision, a division bench of karnataka high court has held when the ..... was told by the deceased to them with respect to the harassment meted out to her by her husband. none of these statements comes within the purview of section 32 of the evidence act. therefore, these statements, in view of the judgment of the supreme court referred to above, are not at all admissible in evidence. there is not a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2006 (SC)

Zahira Habibullah Sheikh and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-08-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC1367; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)559; 2006CriLJ1694; (2006)2GLR1493; JT2006(3)SC399; 2006(2)KLT350(SC); 2006(I)OLR(SC)721; 2006(3)SCALE104; (2006)3SCC374

..... fix up a court of competent jurisdiction.78. since we have directed re-trial it would be desirable to the investigating agency or those supervising the investigation, to act in terms of section 173(8) of the code, as the circumstances seem to or may so warrant. the director general of police, gujarat is directed to monitor re-investigation, if ..... to depend on intercepted allegations made by the parties, or on inconclusive inference from facts elicited in the evidence. in such cases, the court has to act under the second part of the section. sometimes the examination of witnesses as directed by the court may result in what is thought to be 'filling of loopholes'. that is purely a ..... be allowed an opportunity to cross-examine. the right to cross-examine a witness who is called by a court arises not under the provision of section 311, but under the evidence act which gives a party the right to cross-examine a witness who is not his own witness. since a witness summoned by the court could not .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //