Array ( [0] => ..... the order of detention and was taken in custody on 5/3/2005. it was approved by the state government on 10/3/2005 under section 3(3) of the act. reference under section 10 of the act was made to the advisory board on 21/3/2005 and the advisory board recorded its opinion on 12/4/2005 which was received by the ..... its preamble states that the detention order has been passed on the grounds mentioned in paragraph no. 5 and that the detenu is a slumlord as defined in section 2(f) of the act. it further states that the petitioner had taken to the life of crime as a slumlord to target vast open land of the government for acquiring easy money ..... personal encounters with the petitioner or his associate tukaram and the instances stated by them during the in-camera inquiry do reveal that the petitioner acted as a slumlord within the meaning of section 2(f) of the act. witness 'a' stated that the hutment dwellers who purchased the hut from the petitioner and his associate are also required to buy water and ..... [1] => ..... of the scheme. in the instant case, the petitioner is not allowed to avail the benefit because its windmills got destroyed (only on account of an 'act of god') and therefore the petitioner could not continue to generate electricity continuously for a period of six years after commissioning the windmills. in the circumstances, the ..... supply, but it also gives certain benefits to the industrial undertakings generating electricity in the nature of sales tax exemption or deferment or composite benefit under the act. looking to the said fact, we can definitely treat the scheme framed by the government under government resolution dated 27.1.1993 at par with a beneficial ..... due to gross negligence on the part of the industrial undertaking, the wind farm was not kept in running condition. so, in our opinion, if the act of discontinuing generation of electricity is deliberate or voluntary, then only the concerned industrial undertaking should be deprived of the benefit availed under the scheme.33. in ..... [2] => ..... petitoners have no other alternative but to declare a lock-out, so far as the workers involved in the strike were concerned. conciliation proceeding under section 12 of the said act was initiated but no settlement could be arrived at. accordingly, the matter was referred before the appropriate authority by the conciliation officer. all these happened ..... reference issued by the assistant secretary to the government of west bengal, labour department dated 4th of march, 2005 passed under section 10 of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said act').3. before dealing with the issues involved herein, the facts of the case may be briefly narrated here,4. sometime in ..... the refusal by an employer to continue to employ any number of persons employed by him.6. under section 2(q) 'strike' means a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in any industry acting in combination, or a concerted refusal, or a refusal, under a common understanding of any number of persons ..... [3] => ..... by means of notification dated march 30, 1994 referred to above, for the aforesaid relevant years, the government of karnataka exempted payment of surcharge leviable under section 6-c, prior to amendment by means of act no. 18 of 1994, on 'mill yarn (all kinds)'. in fact, mill yarn (all kinds) excluding cotton yarn, spun silk yam, filature ..... 35 [csl. 96(22)] bangalore, dated march 30, 1996, issued by the state government in exercise of its power under section 8-a of the karnataka sales tax act, 1957 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'the act').2. a few facts leading to this petition, are as under:the order of assessment relates to the assessment years 1994-95 ..... only to mill yarn (all kinds). the raw silk and silk yam which find a place in entry 22 of part s of the second schedule to the act is not included for such treatment. the legislature has specifically treated these three goods differently. they are competent to take into consideration this distinction and treat different ..... [4] => ..... 5.2 we are in agreement with the submission by shri pardiwala. the ao may allow the credit for the taxes paid in usa as per the provision of section 90 of the act r.w. article 25(2)(a) of the dtaa between india and usa, whether or not such claim is made in the return or during the assessment proceedings ..... computation of liability of tax. accordingly, we are of the view that the income-tax appellate tribunal was not justified in directing to charge interest under section 234b and 234c of the income-tax act. this question no. 2 is therefore answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.what is relevant is that whether income is computed under ..... employees or sharing the database, will be in the course of business and hence chargeable to tax. the same is chargeable even under the provisions of section 41(1) or 28(iv) of the act, apart from under the definition of income itself same is chargeable to tax. he also submitted that the decision in following cases be considered to arrive ..... [5] => ..... minimum qualification has been laid down for the md course by the central council of indian system of medicine in exercise of powers under indian system of medicine central council act, 1970. it is provided that the degree course should have been completed in the first attempt for admission in md course. it has not been mentioned that the degree course ..... [6] => ..... on 18-10-2004, a case was filed in crime no. 1221/2004 under section 154 of code of criminal procedure for offences under sections 307, 323 i.p.c., read with sections 25 and 27 of indian arms act and 4 (b) of explosive substance act against her husband and three others, the fifth respondent has not deliberately registered f.i ..... .r. under section 302 i.p.c. against the third respondent herein, subsequently who are ..... and in particular experienced in conducting post-mortem of dead bodies whose death were caused by fire arms/explosives.13. in the proceedings no. roc.58187/04/c1 dated 19-10-20 04, the collector has ordered an enquiry under section 150(3) of police standing order into the death of veerappan and his close associates. accordingly, ..... [7] => ..... the interest of monetary stability or sound economic growth having due regard to the interests of depositors, etc. as provided under section 5(c)(a) of the banking regulations act does not mean that private companies carrying on the business or commercial activity of banking, discharge any public function or public ..... thirdly, not only would the entire proceedings be completed quickly but also inexpensively. it is, therefore, not correct to contend that the standing order or section 22(ii) conflicts with the principles of natural justice.29. further, in their counter-affidavits, the second respondent bank as well as the disciplinary authority ..... of faculty. all of a sudden, the second respondent issued five different charge sheets, within a span of 100 days, against the petitioner alleging various acts of commission and omission in extending credit facilities, incurring expenditure without substantiating proof, falsification of records, suppression of facts, etc. the charges levelled against ..... [8] => [9] => ) Explosives Act 1884 Section 4 Definitions - Sortby Old - Year 2006 - Page 88 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2006 Page 88 of about 5,300 results (0.459 seconds)

Mar 02 2006 (HC)

Shri Ashok Dadu Mangale Vs. Shri A.N. Roy and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2219

..... the order of detention and was taken in custody on 5/3/2005. it was approved by the state government on 10/3/2005 under section 3(3) of the act. reference under section 10 of the act was made to the advisory board on 21/3/2005 and the advisory board recorded its opinion on 12/4/2005 which was received by the ..... its preamble states that the detention order has been passed on the grounds mentioned in paragraph no. 5 and that the detenu is a slumlord as defined in section 2(f) of the act. it further states that the petitioner had taken to the life of crime as a slumlord to target vast open land of the government for acquiring easy money ..... personal encounters with the petitioner or his associate tukaram and the instances stated by them during the in-camera inquiry do reveal that the petitioner acted as a slumlord within the meaning of section 2(f) of the act. witness 'a' stated that the hutment dwellers who purchased the hut from the petitioner and his associate are also required to buy water and .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 02 2006 (HC)

Rolcon Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat and 5 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Reported in : (2009)21VST118(Guj)

..... of the scheme. in the instant case, the petitioner is not allowed to avail the benefit because its windmills got destroyed (only on account of an 'act of god') and therefore the petitioner could not continue to generate electricity continuously for a period of six years after commissioning the windmills. in the circumstances, the ..... supply, but it also gives certain benefits to the industrial undertakings generating electricity in the nature of sales tax exemption or deferment or composite benefit under the act. looking to the said fact, we can definitely treat the scheme framed by the government under government resolution dated 27.1.1993 at par with a beneficial ..... due to gross negligence on the part of the industrial undertaking, the wind farm was not kept in running condition. so, in our opinion, if the act of discontinuing generation of electricity is deliberate or voluntary, then only the concerned industrial undertaking should be deprived of the benefit availed under the scheme.33. in .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 02 2006 (HC)

Ubique Metamed Private Limited and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and o ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Reported in : [2006]147STC27(Cal)

..... petitoners have no other alternative but to declare a lock-out, so far as the workers involved in the strike were concerned. conciliation proceeding under section 12 of the said act was initiated but no settlement could be arrived at. accordingly, the matter was referred before the appropriate authority by the conciliation officer. all these happened ..... reference issued by the assistant secretary to the government of west bengal, labour department dated 4th of march, 2005 passed under section 10 of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said act').3. before dealing with the issues involved herein, the facts of the case may be briefly narrated here,4. sometime in ..... the refusal by an employer to continue to employ any number of persons employed by him.6. under section 2(q) 'strike' means a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in any industry acting in combination, or a concerted refusal, or a refusal, under a common understanding of any number of persons .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 02 2006 (HC)

Handicrafts and Handloom Export Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. State of ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Reported in : [2006]148STC445(Kar)

..... by means of notification dated march 30, 1994 referred to above, for the aforesaid relevant years, the government of karnataka exempted payment of surcharge leviable under section 6-c, prior to amendment by means of act no. 18 of 1994, on 'mill yarn (all kinds)'. in fact, mill yarn (all kinds) excluding cotton yarn, spun silk yam, filature ..... 35 [csl. 96(22)] bangalore, dated march 30, 1996, issued by the state government in exercise of its power under section 8-a of the karnataka sales tax act, 1957 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'the act').2. a few facts leading to this petition, are as under:the order of assessment relates to the assessment years 1994-95 ..... only to mill yarn (all kinds). the raw silk and silk yam which find a place in entry 22 of part s of the second schedule to the act is not included for such treatment. the legislature has specifically treated these three goods differently. they are competent to take into consideration this distinction and treat different .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 02 2006 (TRI)

ibm India Ltd., (Amalgamated with Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Reported in : (2007)105ITD1(Bang.)

..... 5.2 we are in agreement with the submission by shri pardiwala. the ao may allow the credit for the taxes paid in usa as per the provision of section 90 of the act r.w. article 25(2)(a) of the dtaa between india and usa, whether or not such claim is made in the return or during the assessment proceedings ..... computation of liability of tax. accordingly, we are of the view that the income-tax appellate tribunal was not justified in directing to charge interest under section 234b and 234c of the income-tax act. this question no. 2 is therefore answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.what is relevant is that whether income is computed under ..... employees or sharing the database, will be in the course of business and hence chargeable to tax. the same is chargeable even under the provisions of section 41(1) or 28(iv) of the act, apart from under the definition of income itself same is chargeable to tax. he also submitted that the decision in following cases be considered to arrive .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 02 2006 (HC)

Dr. Banshpati Prasad Vs. Principal, Government Ayurvedic College and o ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Reported in : 2006(4)MPLJ358

..... minimum qualification has been laid down for the md course by the central council of indian system of medicine in exercise of powers under indian system of medicine central council act, 1970. it is provided that the degree course should have been completed in the first attempt for admission in md course. it has not been mentioned that the degree course .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 02 2006 (HC)

The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Its Secretary, Department ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2412; 2006(2)CTC285; (2006)3MLJ160

..... on 18-10-2004, a case was filed in crime no. 1221/2004 under section 154 of code of criminal procedure for offences under sections 307, 323 i.p.c., read with sections 25 and 27 of indian arms act and 4 (b) of explosive substance act against her husband and three others, the fifth respondent has not deliberately registered f.i ..... .r. under section 302 i.p.c. against the third respondent herein, subsequently who are ..... and in particular experienced in conducting post-mortem of dead bodies whose death were caused by fire arms/explosives.13. in the proceedings no. roc.58187/04/c1 dated 19-10-20 04, the collector has ordered an enquiry under section 150(3) of police standing order into the death of veerappan and his close associates. accordingly, .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 02 2006 (HC)

M. Anbu Vs. the Reserve Bank of India,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Reported in : (2006)IILLJ914Mad

..... the interest of monetary stability or sound economic growth having due regard to the interests of depositors, etc. as provided under section 5(c)(a) of the banking regulations act does not mean that private companies carrying on the business or commercial activity of banking, discharge any public function or public ..... thirdly, not only would the entire proceedings be completed quickly but also inexpensively. it is, therefore, not correct to contend that the standing order or section 22(ii) conflicts with the principles of natural justice.29. further, in their counter-affidavits, the second respondent bank as well as the disciplinary authority ..... of faculty. all of a sudden, the second respondent issued five different charge sheets, within a span of 100 days, against the petitioner alleging various acts of commission and omission in extending credit facilities, incurring expenditure without substantiating proof, falsification of records, suppression of facts, etc. the charges levelled against .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 02 2006 (HC)

Thakorebhai Haribhai Patel Vs. DakshIn Gujarat Aahir Seva-samaj Trust ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1023

D.A. Mehta, J.1. This petition, though styled as being under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, in effect is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner challenges order dated 15th January, 2004 made by the trial Court below application Exh.226 in Special Civil Suit No. 26 of 1997 rejecting the application moved by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). 2. The petitioner herein is proposed defendant in Special Civil Suit No. 26 of 1997. The said suit has been instituted by respondent No. 12 herein (original plaintiff) while respondent Nos. 1 to 11 are original defendant Nos. 1 to 11. Except for the petitioner, the parties shall be referred to as per their respective description in the suit. 3. The case of the petitioner in nutshell is that the petitioner is brother of defendant No. 5 and both of them are sons of deceased Haribhai Kalidas Patel. That the plaintiff and defendant No. 5 are lawfully marrie...

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 02 2006 (HC)

Homey Bee Natural Products Private Limited Vs. Admarjodh Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Reported in : (2006)143PLR353

Jasbir Singh, J.1. Respondent No. 1 field suit for recovery of disputed amount against respondent Nos. 2 and 3.2. Vide order, under challenge, his application, under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC was allowed and the petitioner was allowed to be added as one of the defendants.3. It is apparent from the records that when originally, written statement was filed by respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in the suit, they took a specific objection that for non-joinder of necessary party i.e. the petitioner, the suit be dismissed. Despite that, respondent No. 1 continued with his suit, led his evidence and also allowed respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to complete their evidence. He moved application for amendment, as referred to above, . only on 18.11.2004, after about more than six years of filing of the suit, which, this Court feels has wrongly been allowed by the court below, vide order, under challenge.4. Perusal of the record indicates that when written statement was filed by respondent Nos. 2 and 3, it was brought t...

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //