Difference - Judgment Search Results

Mrs. Kailash Suneja and ors. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1998)145CTR(Del)560

..... to be fair just and reasonable and not arbitrary the authority has been applying different yardsticks in different cases though in determining fair market value of a property there has to be ..... months thereforee the apparent consideration has to be suitably discounted in that case the difference between the fmv and the effective discounted apparent consideration would still increase further thereforee .....

R. Gandhi and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by the Ministry of La ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1997(3)CTC255

..... an official gazette subject to such condition as may be prescribed provided different rates for different scheduled goods and different local areas may be specified by the state government b 6 exemption ..... of the seventh schedule to the constitution thus the two legislations operate on different fields of the legislative activities while making the impugned legislation possibility of incidental encroachment .....

Cc Vs. Kunal Metals (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1997)(69)LC537Tri(Delhi)

..... the cargo at the load port at least containers should be different but surprisingly containers were correct which were taken for loading ..... process of smuggling for evading payment of customs duty consists of different links the links aid and abet each other sometimes through ..... appellants either to return the goods or to remit the difference of amount the appellants after receiving letter dated 14 8 .....

Smt. Gerty Suvarna and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1998]92CompCas782(Kar); ILR1998KAR1151; 1998(6)KarLJ57

..... property act even though the causes of action for the two loans are different where different loans furnishing different causes of action are secured by two or more mortgages of the same ..... expression cause of action is not defined in any enactment it has different meanings in different contexts or in different circumstances its meaning may be restricted wide compendious contractual or contextual as .....

Amchem Products, Inc. Vs. Windsor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... accident class members in this case were exposed to different asbestoscontaining products in different ways over different periods and for different amounts of time some suffered no physical injury others ..... in this case class members were exposed to different asbestoscontaining products for different amounts of time in different ways and over different periods some class members suffer no physical .....

Almendarez-torres Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of appropriate punishments than did the statute in mcmillan we nonetheless conclude that these differences do not change the constitutional outcome for several basic reasons first the sentencing factor ..... the sentencing factor at issue in mcmillan triggered a mandatory minimum sentence yet that difference between a permissive maximum and a mandatory minimum does not systematically or normally work .....

General Motors Corp. Vs. Tracy

Court: US Supreme Court

..... clause assumes a comparison of substantially similar entities when the allegedly competing entities provide different products there is a threshold question whether the companies are indeed similarly situated for ..... subject to review under the dormant commerce clause when the allegedly competing entities provide different products as here there is a threshold question whether the companies are indeed .....

Mcmillian Vs. Monroe County

Court: US Supreme Court

..... sheriff petitioner s second concern is that under our holding here sheriffs will be characterized differently in different states but while it might be easier to decide cases arising under 1983 and ..... precinct commanders had unreviewable authority over how arrestees were processed each commander might have a different processing policy but that does not render a commander s policy that of her precinct .....

Vacco Vs. Quill

Court: US Supreme Court

..... assisting suicide nor its statutes permitting patients to refuse medical treatment treat anyone differently from anyone else or draw any distinctions between persons everyone regardless of ..... traditions is both important and 6 the american medical association emphasizes the fundamental difference between refusing life sustaining treatment and demanding a lifeending treatment american medical .....

Washington Vs. Glucksberg

Court: US Supreme Court

..... mind that the nature of the right claimed if recognized as one constitutionally required would differ in no essential way from other constitutional rights guaranteed by enumeration or derived from ..... assistance ante at 724 but i would not reject the respondents claim without considering a different formulation for which our legal tradition may provide greater support that formulation would use words .....