Difference - Judgment Search Results

Travancore Cements Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1994)LC415Tri(Delhi)

..... all the white cement manufacturers have accordingly been selling at different prices at different areas the collector allowed different regionwise discount in respect of wholesale dealers similarly they ..... were selling to industrial consumers in different states at different prices treating them as different classes of buyers the prices filed accordingly were approved .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Goyal Trading Co.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

..... iii correspondence if any with hissaria brothers calcutta regarding payment of commission to them to difference sic to tribeni technochem ltd calcutta iv relation if any with directors of messrs ..... is claimed by the assessee that necessary confirmations from these parties regarding the receipt of difference from the assessee was furnished before the assessing officer and also before the commissioner .....

S.R. Bommai and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others Etc. Et ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1994SC1918; JT1994(2)SC215; 1994(2)SCALE37; (1994)3SCC1; [1994]2SCR644

..... and varied factors fact changing situations potential consequences public reaction motivations and responses of different classes of people and their anticipated future behaviour and a host of other ..... and varied factors fast changing situation potential consequences public reaction motivations and responses of different classes of people and their anticipated future behaviour an a host of other .....

Weiss Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... it wished to require a second appointment before already commissioned officers could occupy them this difference negates any permissible inference that congress intended that military judges should receive a second ..... as a military judge judging by the purposes of the appointments clause however this difference is immaterial it cannot seriously be contended that in confirming the literally tens of .....

Fogerty Vs. Fantasy, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... standard for awarding attorney s fees which treats successful plaintiffs and successful defendants differently under that standard commonly termed the dual standard prevailing plaintiffs are generally ..... language supports the rule second it asserts that treating prevailing plaintiffs and defendants differently comports with the objectives and equitable considerations underlying the copyright act as .....

Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. Vs. Grumet

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the new york legislature acted with discriminatory intent this particularity takes on a different cast however when the accommodation requires the government to draw politicalor electoral boundaries ..... religious institutions twice and religious bodies once astonishingly however justice souter dismisses the difference between a transfer of government power to citizens who share a common religion .....

J. E. B. Vs. Alabama Ex Rel. T. B.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... similarities between the experiences of racial minorities and women in some contexts overpower those differences note beyond batson eliminating genderbased peremptory challenges 105 harv l rev 1920 1921 136 ..... singled out for discriminatory treatment in this process is preposterous the situation would be different if both sides systematically struck individuals of one group so that the strikes evinced .....

United States Vs. Granderson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and the proviso need not be interpreted in pari materia with the discrete differently worded provision prescribing revocation of the supervised release of drug possessors moreover the ..... materia to call for parallel treatment of drug offenders under noncustodial supervision whatever the differences between supervised release and probation surely supervised release is more like probation than .....

Akshar Mudrak Industries Units Sahakari Premises Ltd. Vs. the Municipa ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1995Bom105; 1994(3)BomCR516

..... provides for levy of compounded charge in cases where the premises are used for different purposes for which different rales of water charges are applicable also applies only where separation of supply ..... higher than that applicable to the premises are chargeable and where separation of supply to different users with separate meters is not practicable a compounded charge at the following rates shall .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sterling Foods (Goa)

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1995)127CTR(Bom)30; [1995]213ITR851(Bom)

..... the expression manufacture or production according to mr jetley manufacturing and processing are two different activities every act of manufacture may involve processing but every process does not ..... statutes are not interchangeable expressions though often used in juxtaposition they convey different concepts and refer to different activities processing is a much wider concept the nature and extent .....