Difference - Judgment Search Results

Mohammad Khalil Khan and Others Vs. Mahbub Ali Mian and Others

Court: Privy Council

..... of 1928 and 8 of 1928 as the parties were different and different reliefs were sought against them the property in district shahjahanpur ..... property and that the two causes of action were thus different 3 that having opposed the application of the plaintiffs for ..... unless the causes of action respecting the two properties were different their lordships are of opinion as will presently appear that .....

Mccollum Vs. Board of Education

Court: US Supreme Court

..... conception undefined by differentiating particularities is not an issue for constitutional adjudication local programs differ from each other in many and crucial respects some released time classes are under ..... school programs not before us which though colloquially characterized as released time present situations differing in aspects that may well be constitutionally crucial the use of the words .....

Ftc Vs. Morton Salt Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... which manufacturers and sells table salt in interstate commerce had discriminated in price between different purchasers of like grades and qualities and concluded that such discriminations were in ..... law that the commission may strike down any discount upon the reasonable possibility that different prices for like goods to competing purchasers may substantially injure competition coupled with .....

Ramji Lal S/O Mahadeo Parsad Vs. Rex

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1949P& H67

..... delegate can exercise that authority it is obvious that the court itself functioning through its different judges nominated for the purpose can exercise that function moreover it is an admitted ..... to follow his lordship after pointing out the various difficulties and inconsistencies that arise in different judges hearing any such applications or their sometimes being heard by one bench and .....

Saradhakar Naik and ors. Vs. the King

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1950Ori89

..... jurisdiction the words high court has wider or at any rate different signification 9 the matters in respect of which right of ..... include any acceding states i shall re advert to the difference of language in section 205 as adapted ordinarily we should ..... exercise of its extended jurisdiction may be conceived of in two different ways namely either high court in india with extraterritorial jurisdiction .....

Behari Lal and anr. Vs. M.M. Gobardhan Lal and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1948All353

..... equitable jurisdiction the history of legislation in england is very much different from the history of various codes in this country 19 ..... upon which a second appeal may be preferred would be quite different from the grounds upon which an application for a review ..... question which this bench is considering came up for consideration before different high courts and it is noticeable that the view that .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. Siddareddy Venkatasubba Reddy a ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1949]17ITR15(Mad)

..... patta and land agreements from the government for mica mining the four documents relate to different mines namely the kubera mine the lakshminarasimha mine and the deepadurga mine the last mine ..... the annual a lease amounts appearing in the instrument in question there made a material difference completely failed these two decisions were followed in abdul kayum sahib hussain sahib v commissioner .....

Oyama Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for a statutory discrimination unquestionably there were and are cultural linguistic and racial differences between japanese aliens and native americans not of japanese origin or ancestry footnote ..... upon many important and vital questions all reasonable classification puts its subjects into different categories where they may have advantages or disadvantages that flow from their positions .....

Commissioner Vs. Sunnen

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the board of tax appeals involving a similar royalty agreement and assignment but different license contracts and different tax years was not conclusive of the controversy under the doctrine of ..... 7 the doctrine of collateral estoppel is inapplicable in litigation regarding income taxes for different years where decisions of this court intervening between the earlier and later litigation have .....

United States Vs. Sullivan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... drawn the conclusion that this decision necessarily will control future decisions concerning those very different commodities if the statute as written required this furnishing no substantial basis for ..... two in important respects indicates that each broad subdivision of the act presents different problems of interpretation neither the misbranded foods section nor the misbranded cosmetics section .....