Difference - Judgment Search Results

Mannalal Soorana Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)4ITD131(Delhi)

..... learned departmental representative was that the third member could not re frame the point of difference and then answer it he then submitted that when two learned members give contrary ..... turned on the order of the tribunal in quantum appeals as penalty proceedings were entirely different and various contentions had to be independently considered in penalty proceedings he also submitted that .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Hindustan Aluminium Corporation Limi ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1983Cal307,87CWN450

..... the government keeping in mind the object of availability at fair price to fix different prices at different stages but only the price at one of the stages depending upon the government ..... a producer to his auxiliary plant for further processing and sale as indigenous aluminium of different specifications provided that where the central government may require any producer to supply under clause .....

G.A. Renderian Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1983)32CTR(Cal)318,[1984]145ITR387(Cal)

..... its registration certificate the supreme court observed that though the blending of different qualities of ore possessing differing chemical and physical composition so as to produce or of the contractual ..... operation experience some change here in the present case diverse quantities of ore possessing different chemical and physical compositions are blended together to produce ore of the requisite .....

Clements Vs. Fashing

Court: US Supreme Court

..... last forever although such an approach is unobjectionable in a case involving the differences between different public offices i surely could not subscribe to justice rehnquist s formulation of ..... legislation that may appear to affect page 457 u s 963 similarly situated people differently legislatures are ordinarily assumed to have acted constitutionally under traditional equal protection principles .....

American Tobacco Co. Vs. Patterson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to apply different standards of compensation or different terms conditions or privileges of employment pursuant to a bona fide seniority ..... application the provision declares it not unlawful for an employer to apply different standards of compensation or different terms conditions or privileges of employment pursuant to a bona fide seniority .....

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. George Joseph Fernandez and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1982Cal440

..... arbitration clause which was as follows 18 any dispute or difference at any time arising between the parties hereto in ..... respondent it was further alleged had produced a situation fundamentally different from which the parties could not have reasonably contemplated ..... he characterised the averments made as afterthoughts and the alleged difference on the question of fundamental breach if any according .....

AtIn Bose Vs. Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1983Cal376

..... special conditions which were provided therein a condition read as follows where the special conditions differ from the general conditions those special conditions shall override the latter all materials shall ..... of the clauses contained in the contract and accordingly the expression such disputes and differences of opinion has been used in connection therewith in our opinion the disputes which .....

Varada Iyengar Vs. Ramudu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1983)2MLJ517

..... the contesting parties themselves are concerned i do not think the existence of different proceedings before different tribunals on an identical question should at all embarass the parties in ..... day legislation in may judgment the very existence of sharply defined jurisdictions of different tribunals under different statutory enactments forbid the introduction of a rule of construction of any implied .....

The State of Gujarat Vs. Sukhram Jagannath

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1982)2GLR332; [1982]50STC76(Guj)

..... assistant government pleader is that since there was some process treatment or adaptation of the different articles constituting pan masala of both the varieties there was an element of manufacturing ..... distinct commercial commodity in view of what we have stated above instead of taking these different constituent elements separately if they are eaten together to have the ingredients more palatable .....

Fatechand and Sons Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer, V Circle, Hyderabad

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1983]54STC166(AP)

..... applied for determining whether a particular material woven out of cotton is cotton cloth or different goods is whether the particular material is identifiable commercially or a marketable commodity this ..... sarees and dhoties were recognised as cotton fabrics though they are identifiable and marketable commodities different from mere cotton cloth or cotton fabrics and were held exempt from tax in .....