Skip to content


Difference - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: difference Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.065 seconds)
Oct 15 1968 (FN)

Williams Vs. Rhodes

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-15-1968

..... classification footnote 5 in the present situation the state laws place burdens on two different although overlapping kinds of rights the right of individuals to associate for the advancement ..... amendment permits the states to make classifications and does not require them to treat different groups uniformly nevertheless it bans any invidious discrimination harper v virginia board of elections .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 1968 (HC)

Bhonreylal and ors. Vs. Kunj Beharilal

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Nov-29-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Raj299b

..... bom 35 the period of limitation may be different under two different circumstances it may be different if it modifies or alters a period ..... for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from the period prescribed by the schedule the provisions of ..... special or local law for the appeal or application was different from that prescribed by the limitation act but the present .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 17 1968 (FN)

Powell Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-17-1968

..... alcoholics which predominate in the united states and these types display a broad range of different and occasionally inconsistent symptoms footnote 5 moreover wholly distinct types relatively rare in this ..... country predominate in nations with different cultural attitudes regarding the consumption of alcohol footnote 6 even if we limit our .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 18 1968 (HC)

J. G. Ingram and Son Ltd. Vs. Callaghan (inspector of Taxes).

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-18-1968

Reported in: [1969]74ITR282(Cal)

..... cessation and the commissioners should have found that the trade was suspended not permanently discontinued different considerations in my view apply to these two separate submissions on the first it seems ..... assembling and selling these products thereafter the taxpayers trade was in period no 2 a different trade namely that of merchanting similar products made had assembled by somebody else the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 1968 (HC)

Modi Vanaspati Manufacturing Company and anr. Vs. Katihar Jute Mills ( ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-28-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Cal496

..... of the appellant modis contended that there were three separate contracts between different parties on different dates and on different terms the first contract was said to be entered into on 6 ..... the contracts between the parties are totally distinct and different and came into existence at different points of time on different terms at different prices it will not therefore be correct to conclude .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 12 1968 (HC)

Bireswar Sen and anr. Vs. Ashalata Ghose and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-12-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Cal111

..... ashalata not her husband manmatha the pleader makes all the difference standing between manmatha and the application of another branch of ..... of bounty being ashalata instead of manmatha therefore makes no difference for the simple reason that there is nc distinction between ..... as much 83 the authorities cited do not show anything different either the privy council case of nagendrabala dassi v dinanath .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 14 1968 (HC)

T. S. Baliah Vs. T. S. Rangachari, Income-tax Officer, Central Circle ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-14-1968

Reported in: [1969]71ITR163(Mad)

..... the offences being the same and identical they cannot stand together in view of the differences and inconsistencies between these provisions and that therefore section 177 indian penal code must ..... repealing act or regulation had not been passed this section emphasises therefore that unless a different intention appears in the repealing act ordinarily any legal proceeding can be instituted in respcct .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 16 1968 (HC)

M.R. Pratap and anr. Vs. the Director of Enforcement

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-16-1968

Reported in: 1969CriLJ1582

..... amendment in 1957 after amendment the act has introduced two different proceedings for punishing a person contravening the provisions namely 1 ..... on the ground that it is governed by a procedure different from that prescribed by the criminal procedure code that indeed is not ..... or tribunals presided over by magistrates or officers belonging to different classes and there is a devolution of powers among .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 06 1968 (HC)

K. Subramania Pillai and ors. Vs. State of Madras

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-06-1968

Reported in: [1969]23STC359(Mad)

..... hand cane jaggery was subject to sales tax at different rates in different times till 1st april 1958 and it secured an ..... palm jaggery which is a class by itself and totally different from cane jaggery and which is marketed through co operative ..... question though classified as products of village industries are totally different in composition and as they are commercially and popularly understood .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 1968 (HC)

Shivram Bari Gadre and ors. Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer of Collotol ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-24-1968

Reported in: [1969]23STC98(Cal)

..... is also mentioned that the partnership firm is also carrying on business under different trade names in different places but that fact by itself does not conclusively establish that the businesses ..... carried on by the partners although under different trade names form one unit these questions again cannot be conveniently decided by this court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //