Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results

Manohar S. Prabhu and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR130

..... parliament and therefore from the wide language in which the article is couched it would appear that subject only to compliance with the procedure laid down in article 368 itself the powers of parliament to amend constitution ..... for it is stated therein that we the people of india having solemnly resolved to constitute india into a sovereign socialist secular democratic republic do hereby adopt .....

Vithalrao Udhaorao Uttarwar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1977Bom99

..... the constituent power under article 368 of the constitution however when that power is exercised by parliament amending ninth schedule ..... procedure therefor by sheer logic of language and the underlying principles of the omnipotence of such sovereign constituent power ..... constituent powers given under article 368 of the constitution of india it was explained that under article 368 of the constitution .....

Abdul Rahiman JamaluddIn Vs. Vithal Arjun and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1958Bom94; (1957)59BOMLR579

..... constitution they must be held void the constitution can be amended only by parliament and in the manner provided by article 368 of the constitution and any attempt to amend ..... part iii of the constitution of india and is therefore void in so ..... force and vigour only a procedural requirement appears to be imposed ..... subordinate legislature the power of amending the constitution the effect of article 31 b .....

Baptist Anthony Rumao Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ...

Court : Mumbai

of private schools conditions of service regulation act 1977 constitution of india 1950 article 226 comparative citation 2012 3 schools conditions of service regulation act 1977 constitution of india 1950 article 226 comparative citation 2012 3 clr 18 of service regulation act 1977 constitution of india 1950 article 226 comparative citation 2012 3 clr 18

Smt. Sunanda Chandrakant Juvatkar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007BomCR(Cri)898

no 1 of 2003 by the presiding officer of the board of juvenile at ratnagiri he came to be acquitted as inflicted upon his body by weapons like axe and sura article nos a she was disturbed annoyed and was under a us we have perused the acquittal order passed in juvenile criminal case no 1 of 2003 and we have noted that and torch were made were accessible to the public and therefore these recoveries could not be relied upon we are not

Purshottam Dattaraya Shetye Vs. Yeshvadabai Jayadeo Shetye

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 156Ind.Cas.381

accordance with common sense that the court has no inherent power to disregard a method of procedure enjoined or provided by file and further that that would have been a satisfactory procedure which would have met the case perfectly well 1099 and under rule 25 would have been sufficient the position is therefore that the district judge has made an order of remand

Madhukar Deorao Kulkarni Vs. State of Maharashtra and 4 ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)2050; I(2002)DMC769

and there is a presumption under section 113 of the indian evidence act that in the second dying declaration the deceased under the 1996 act in other words nothing contained in article 3 of schedule i of the bombay court fees act to file petition before a principal civil court having original jurisdiction which is not high court challenging an award made under an application or petition or memorandum of appeal filed in civil or revenue court challenging any award made under the arbitration 13 of schedule ii of the bombay court fees act therefore the learned advocate for the applicant contends that the anticipatory

Premananda S.X. Verencar and ors. Vs. Vilas Nakul Bale and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1991(1)BomCR244

of the code any restriction should be read into the power specifically granted by the legislature to the police officer of to costs civil jurisdiction section 151 of code of civil procedure 1908 failure of defendant to implead legal heirs of plaintiff meant for perpetuating injustice brought about by technicalities the petition therefore fails the rule is hereby discharged however there should be

Prakash Supdu Chaudhari Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR588

is punishable under chapter xii xvi or xvii of the indian penal code he can be dealt with normal criminal law essence of the right of the state to invoke exceptional power is that the witnesses are unwilling to come forward to petitioner is without jurisdiction externment order quashed code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 section 41 swatanter kumar of such miscreant in the locality for a temporary period therefore sine qua non in exercise of powers is that the

Bombay Suburban Electric Supply Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Bo ...

Court : Mumbai

or not these services are rendered to a person outside india by the assessee within a meaning of sub section 1a vs calcutta agency ltd 1950 18 cch 0116 iscc the jurisdiction of the high court in the matter of income tax