Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: mumbai Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.148 seconds)Manohar S. Prabhu and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-03-1986
Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR130
..... parliament and therefore from the wide language in which the article is couched it would appear that subject only to compliance with the procedure laid down in article 368 itself the powers of parliament to amend constitution ..... for it is stated therein that we the people of india having solemnly resolved to constitute india into a sovereign socialist secular democratic republic do hereby adopt .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.Y. Desle and S.V. Khandge Vs. Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahur ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-18-1986
Reported in : 1986(1)BomCR481
the averments made by the petitioners in the petition and therefore these averments will have to be deemed to be admitted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDewas Tools Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-28-1986
Reported in : 1987(11)LC80(Bombay); 1987(27)ELT646(Bom)
will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of the bank guarantee the appellant will however the given a personal bond the petitioners should be compelled to go to the appellate authority 5 in the result the appeal is allowed as far
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.S. Deshmukh Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-01-1986
Reported in : 1989(44)ELT29(Bom)
of central excise rules 1944 sections 420 and 471 of indian penal code 1860 and sections 5 1 d and 5 excise rules 1944 sections 420 and 471 of indian penal code 1860 and sections 5 1 d and 5 2 of against their acquittal which were not admitted the above notices therefore stand discharged excise evasion of duty sections 3 4 4
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVapson Products and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-27-1986
Reported in : 1987(11)ECC200; 1987(15)LC138(Bombay); 1987(27)ELT608(Bom)
the case of sulekh ram and sons v union of india and others reported in 1978 e l t 525 delhi excise bombay issued trade notice no 175 in exercise of powers under rule 223 of the central excise rules inter alia thereon has been paid indeed it has been made a criminal offence if the goods are removed from the factory without the place of manufacture without first paying the excise duty therefore a purchaser can presume that the goods are duty paid
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnna Appa Sutar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-17-1986
Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR189; 1986MhLJ851
convicted for the offence punishable under section 302 of the indian penal code and sentenced to suffer r i for life direction to the state government we rest on our inherent powers available under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure powers available under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure criminal murder section 302 of indian penal 1860 and section deceased which is not supported by the medical evidence he therefore challenged the truthfulness of the dying declarations mr suryavanshi the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPunichand S/O Ramsing Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-27-1986
Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR748
importance and requires to be decided by the supreme court indian evidence act 1872 section 24 v s sirpurkar deepak verma the limited scope of the enquiry thus pointing to the jurisdiction under the act being confined there is no discussion in one accused evidence of eye witnesses however completely fixing his criminal liability ocular evidence found credible held absence of his name for restoration of the land to sara cannot be sustained therefore the order orderpetition allowed order for restoration of land upto
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.C.K. Sons Corporation Vs. Madhavnagar Cotton Mill Ltd.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-13-1986
Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR729
managing the entire affairs of the company was out of india and was expected back by the end of august 1979 in respect of the cash incentive admissible on exports of powerloom cloth supplied by the respondent mill to the appellants under appeal being aggrieved by the order passed by the city civil court judge bombay dismissing their application for setting aside the making the award as contemplated by rule 21 it is therefore difficult to accept the finding of the learned trial judge
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.N. Agarwal and Co. Vs. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-04-1986
Reported in : 1986(10)ECC350; 1987(30)ELT872(Bom)
charged at the docks and which are approved by the board of trustees of the port of bombay under sections 48 part of machinery the spark plug is used for igniting power and put the machine in motion but that cannot by 85 is electrical machinery and equipment parts thereof it is therefore obvious that chapter 85 does not deal only with electrical
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.T. Blades Vs. Union of India and Others
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-05-1986
Reported in : 1986(9)ECC104; 1989(20)LC485(Bombay); 1986(24)ELT231(Bom)
the allahabad high court in the case of union of india v bhagwan industries ltd reported in air1957all799 the case has refund was made six months after that date the appellate authority rejected the claim that order is now challenged by filing not to be conducted in casual manner and application for amendments are not to be made as a formality it is submitted that the recovery of the duty was illegal and therefore the provisions of section 27 would not be attracted it
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT