Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: mumbai Year: 1967 Page 1 of about 150 results (1.278 seconds)Udhav Shankar Gangawane and ors. Vs. Tarabai and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-03-1967
Reported in : AIR1968Bom308; (1967)69BOMLR795; 1968MhLJ87
other instrument or under a decree or order of a civil court or under an ward where the terms of decree cases therefore have no application 8 the learned judge was therefore right in his conclusion 9 appeal dismissed hindu succession act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnant Sadashiv Netravali Vs. Chitale Agricultural Products Ltd.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-12-1967
Reported in : [1968]38CompCas292(Bom)
1 a the liquidator in the winding up has the power to prosecute the said appeal if he can make arrangements judge s summons on that ground also the petitioner is therefore entitled to a winding up order being made on the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParvatibai Vs. Shankar Mahadu Varkhade and 5 ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-28-1967
Reported in : AIR1967Bom428; (1967)69BOMLR383; 1967MhLJ593
object of the amended section 88d was to define the powers of the government to withdraw the exemption granted to certain of 1957 section 88d of the parent act was also amended the object of the amended section 88d was to define so in one of the petitions before us in special civil application no 1878 of 1964 the certificated landlord ramchandra died which lands were entitled to the exemption section 88c was therefore amended by bombay act xxxviii of 1957 which came into
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSindhu-hochtief (India) (Private), Ltd. Vs. Pratap Dialdas and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-25-1967
Reported in : (1968)IILLJ515Bom
a public trust under the indian trusts act under the indian trusts act under the name and style of gandhidham workman being para 2 thereof provided that the arbitrator shall have power to decide the extent of and manner in which unclaimed the bombay labour welfare fund act 1953 the petition is therefore allowed is terms of prayer a no order as to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArvind N. Mafatlal Vs. T.A. Balakrishnan, Deputy Controller of Estate ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-30-1967
Reported in : [1968]67ITR449(Bom)
law declared by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india said observations directions are issued in exercise of v income tax commissioner delhi again a case under the indian income tax act section 66a was there being considered the if one turns to section 37 it provides where the articles of association of a private company contain restrictive provisions as or to control the exercise of any of the following powers that is to say the powers of a board of but before giving such a construction to an act of parliament one would require that it should either appear very clearly also introduced into the estate duty act by the same amending act 33 of 1958 section 73a provides as follows no while provisions of a statute dealing merely with matters of procedure may properly unless that construction be textually inadmissible have retrospective could be taken within one year of the assessment and therefore that time having elapsed the assessment originally made had become
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Ii Vs. Industrial Investment T ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-11-1967
Reported in : [1968]67ITR436(Bom)
law declared by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india said observations directions are issued in exercise of the supreme court decision in commissioner of income tax v indian bank ltd in that case the assessee which was a 1 is not the law declared by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india said observations directions are by supreme court under article 142 of the constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the are to the contrary in section 10 2 xv what parliament requires to be ascertained is whether the expenditure has been to pay super tax and the decision of the tribunal therefore that the income of the assessee which was liable to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChhotabhai Jethabhai Patel Vs. Industrial Court, Nagpur
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-12-1967
Reported in : 1967MhLJ40
1 this is a petition under art 227 of the constitution filed by chhotabhai jethabhai a bidi merchant respondent 3 nathu costs labour and industrial dismissal article 227 of constitution of india and sections 42 4 and 78 of bombay industrial relations fails and is dismissed with costs labour and industrial dismissal article 227 of constitution of india and sections 42 4 and para d and that power is coupled with a further power to grant reinstatement and back wages if it is found s 78 1 section 42 4 itself has been slightly amended by making a separate provision for an application by an restrictions of section 78 1 a a i cannot control procedure or powers of labour court is not necessary for an under the standing order may be a species even though therefore sub section 4 s 42 makes a proviso requiring an
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKolhapur Sugar Mills, Ltd. Vs. Syed Taki Bilgrami and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-19-1967
Reported in : (1968)ILLJ800Bom
is a petition under arts 226 and 227 of the constitution filed by the petitioner company which runs a sugar mill industrial daily wages articles 226 and 227 of constitution of india maharashtra agricultural lands ceiling on holdings act 1951 section 21 costs fixed at rs 400 labour and industrial daily wages articles 226 and 227 of constitution of india maharashtra agricultural lands any branch of an industry 10 in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section 4 of s 2 of the that notification no 1131 45 dated 4 october 1952 as amended by notification no 3463 101488 lab i dated 30 april 5 of which there is a categorical statement that the procedure adopted by the company in procuring its sugarcane supply from the said notification dated 4 october 1952 and we must therefore deal with the same sri kulkarni has not relied at
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentral India Agencies, Calcutta Vs. Laxminath Brijkishore and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-12-1967
Reported in : AIR1968Bom222; (1968)ILLJ616Bom; 1967MhLJ937
paranjpe j 1 this petition under art 227 of the constitution is directed against an order of the assistant commissioner of 1 labour and industrial reinstatement article 227 of constitution of india section 16 of central provinces and berar industrial disputes settlement into the application of respondent 1 labour and industrial reinstatement article 227 of constitution of india section 16 of central provinces reaching it may be as windeyer j observes that the power to take advantage of an enactment may without impropriety be 1 may 1965 by the bombay industrial relations extension and amendment act 1964 maharashtra act 22 of 1965 on being called act 1946 by the maharashtra act 22 of 1965 and therefore the application was liable to be dismissed the assistant commissioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Bombay Vs. Framji H. Commissariat
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-03-1967
Reported in : [1967]64ITR588(Bom)
law declared by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india said observations directions are issued in exercise of by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india said observations directions are issued in exercise of powers under 1 is not the law declared by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india said observations directions are by supreme court under article 142 of the constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the in the assessment of the assessee 5 in the result therefore our answer to the question referred to us must be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT