Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 301 results (1.321 seconds)Kamal Kant Prasad Sinha, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2008(2)JCR603(Jhr)]
..... power of the parliament to amend the constitution in accordance with law is by article 368 of the constitution let us now reproduce article 368 which is as under 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor 1 notwithstanding anything in this constitution parliament ..... follows we the people of india having solemnly resolved to constitute india into a sovereign socialist .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJhunka Sao Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : 2002CriLJ4230; [2003(1)JCR504(Jhr)]
not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the indian penal code which was levelled against him and claimed to in herstatement under section 164 of the code of criminal procedure 9 in the instant case as per the fardbeyan the threatened her to do away with her life it appears therefore that a girl who has lost her father earlier and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTapeshwar Sahu Vs. B.S.E.B. and ors.
Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : 2001(49)BLJR1590
premises becomes remote causing considerable loss of revenue to the board this has to be prevented at all costs in view premises from the new incum bent as per delegation of powers given below the cases on which dues outstanding are over no 27 1960 83 actual possession was given by nazir civil court ranchi in january 1999 as informed by his letter
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHitesh Verma Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : II(2005)DMC443; [2005(3)JCR495(Jhr)]
law of his daughter some amount has been paid through bank draft and cheque his daughter used to inform near relatives has already remained in custody for about six months and therefore petitioner deserves bail learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBirendra Prasad Sahu @ Birendra Prasad and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand ...
Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2008(3)JCR75(Jhr)]
b 452 323 341 342 354 380 384 of the indian penal code was taken by leaned sub divisional judicial magistrate hold her hair and then accused persons took away household articles as well as articles of her shop and they also there has been no provision in the code of criminal procedure for withdrawal of a criminal prosecution in a warrant trial to chapter xx which deals with the summon cases only therefore were the offence alleged is a warrant triable the magistrate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChotanagpur Agro Agencies Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2003(2)JCR462(Jhr)]
state organ can be checked by article 14 of the constitution if the government action in the matter of entering or tender is violative of article 14 of the constitution of india and is wholly illegal arbitrary and mala fide 8 mr the action of the state organ can be checked by article 14 of the constitution a petition under article 226 of it is only in course of hearing of lpa no 368 of 2002 when the respondents could know the mind of stated that there are inherent limitations in exercise of that power of judicial review there can be no question of infringement observing all the formalities as per the rules and established procedure and after keeping in view the specification as required the hearing lpa no 368 of 2002 in my considered opinion therefore the impugned order of cancellation of tender and the supply
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentral Coal Fields Ltd. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2007(1)JCR94(Jhr)]
such challenge under article 301 was rejected by 7 judges constitution bench of the supreme court by holding that the taxes de 1995 2 gau lt 218 db and union of india v smt gita banik 1996 2 glt 246 are not by the parliament or the state legislature clause b of article 304 confers a power upon the state legislature similar to 302 is not subject to the requirement of reasonableness the power of the state to impose restrictions under article 304 is binding upon the union legislature and the state legislatures but parliament can get rid of the limitation imposed by article 301 goods into local areas for consumption use or sale thereof amendment ordinance 2001 satisfies the test of compensatory tax so as steel ltd and anr v state of haryana and ors civil appeal no 3453 of 2002 which was referred to 5 appeal and not to the deposit to be made it therefore appears that an appeal filed under section 173 cannot be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUday Shankar Ojha and ors. Vs. Jharkhand State Election Commission and ...
Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2008(2)JCR249(Jhr)]
areas through legislation as contemplated under article 243zc of the constitution of india the court rejecting the submissions made by the period as provided in article 334 of the constitution of india 26 section 19 a of the municipal corporation amendment act members of scheduled caste and scheduled tribe for better appreciation articles 243q 243s and 243t are reproduced herein below 243q constitution since long due to super session and inadequate devolution of powers and functions upon the weaker sections of the society in would like to quote herein below the extract of the parliamentary debate on 73rd amendment of the constitution i don t 24 1 2007 29 section 8 of ranchi municipal corporation amendment and adoption act 2001 was substituted vide amendment act of the constitution sub section 3 of section 13 provides the procedure for filling up seats reserved for scheduled castes scheduled tribes india has not been extended to the scheduled area and therefore there cannot be any municipality in scheduled area and no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLarsen and Toubro Limited Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and o ...
Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2008(1)JCR210(Jhr)]; (2009)21VST173(Jharkh)
in sub clause b of article 286 3 of the constitution 21 his lordships finally held as under 40 we are the supreme court in the case of builders association of india and ors v union of india and ors 1989 2scr320 works contracts the present petitioner also filed writ petitions under article 32 of the constitution of india challenging the validity of way as to bring within the ambit of the taxing power a sale in the course of inter state trade or of clause 3 of article 286 it is open to parliament to impose some other restrictions or conditions which are not tax under entry 54 of the state list the 46th amendment does no more than making it possible for the states 15 of the central sales tax act 1956 the assessee therefore moved the supreme court challenging the constitutional validity of 46th
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFelix Tamba Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : AIR2009Jhar1; [2008(4)JCR542(Jhr)]
of education clause 3 of the article 15 of the constitution envisages special protection and affirmative action for women and children it was urged that after commencement of the constitution of india the provisions of section 46 of the chota nagpur tenancy beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights article 3 assures that everyone has the right to life liberty court on the ground that the deputy commissioner had no power to review the order the high court disposed of the to education must mean something this conclusion is bolstered by parliaments statement of objects and reasons for article 21 a the section 47 1 bb was inserted by chota nagpur tenancy amendment act 1976 on careful reading of the aforesaid provisions it belonging to any occupancy raiyat may be sold under the procedure provided by the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act a way of life of political democracy economic empowerment is therefore a basic human right and a fundamental right as part
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT