Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: kolkata Year: 1975 Page 1 of about 189 results (1.116 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Indian Sugar Mills Association
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-17-1975
Reported in : [1978]111ITR429(Cal)
decision in the case of commissioner of income tax v indian sugar mills association 1974 97itr486 sc construing the relevant rules of wide import and it was therefore thought necessary by parliament in its wisdom to impose certain restrictions on the area nor considered at any stage before the revenue authorities and therefore it is not open to the assessee to raise this
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAppejay Steel Works Private Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-19-1975
Reported in : [1976]103ITR806(Cal)
of challenge in this application under article 226 of the constitution is the notice dated the 10th february 1971 issued under 1 the subject matter of challenge in this application under article 226 of the constitution is the notice dated the 10th commissioner of income tax central range i calcutta had no jurisdiction and no authority to issue the impugned notice it appears
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNetai Chandra Ghosh Vs. Gour Mohan Ghosh and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Aug-22-1975
Reported in : AIR1976Cal58
such sole occupation by one co sharer does not necessarily constitute ouster of other co owners at the same time it evidence of the commissioner the learned munsif invoked his inherent power to secure justice and allowed the application for insertion of necessary for adjudication of the matters in controversy provided such amendment does not change the nature and character of the suit
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRathindra Nath Bose Vs. Jyoti Bikash Ghosh and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jul-07-1975
Reported in : AIR1975Cal377,79CWN873
issued ordinarily the court is not to use its inherent powers to make the necessary orders in the interest of justice 39 section 94 creates jurisdiction while order 39 is the procedure through which such power can be exercised it was further
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Official Trustee of West Bengal Vs. Manichoor Ghosha and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-30-1975
Reported in : AIR1975Cal424
in the negative and question c in the affirmative 4 therefore i answer question a yes question b no and question
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuresh Chandra Sarkar Vs. Gosaidas Pal
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Sep-22-1975
Reported in : AIR1976Cal87
under order 9 rule 13 of the code of civil procedure for setting aside the ex parte decree and for restoration refused any post card sent by the court the question therefore arises whether the alleged refusal of a postcard sent by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGour Gopal Dutt and ors. Vs. Sm. Shantilata Mitra and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-05-1975
Reported in : AIR1976Cal475
execution of the decree and so is wholly outside the scope of the order of contempt made by this court and that court is the execution of the decree by the procedure laid down in civil procedure code and during the pendency to the cause title as given by the parties i therefore do not find any substance in mr deb s argument
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSoorajmal Srigopal Vs. Income-tax Officer, 'F' Ward and Ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-27-1975
Reported in : [1979]117ITR326(Cal)
laxminarayan atmaram whose office is also located at p 36 india exchange place calcutta 1 i presume that this transaction may looked into if the transaction is genuine or not 4 therefore the question is whether on these materials it could be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTarak Chandra Paik and ors. Vs. Naim Mondal and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Sep-04-1975
Reported in : 1976CriLJ769
be referred to the competent authority who alone had exclusive jurisdiction to decide the question accordingly mr panda s contention was mr panda also submitted that under section 21 3 as amended of the land reforms act if there is any question the proceeding under section 145 of the code of criminal procedure and in restraining both the parties from entering into the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJnan Ranian Banerjee Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-19-1975
Reported in : 1975CriLJ1258
advisory board on 4th july 1974 report of the advisory board that there is sufficient cause for detention was sent on the order of detention was passed in colourable exercise of powers it was pointed out in that case that no hard stated that from the materials collected during investigation of the criminal cases arising out of the said two incidents the detaining to the future conduct of the detenu and its utility therefore lies only so far as it subserves that purpose and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT