Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: kolkata Year: 1964 Page 1 of about 163 results (1.049 seconds)Ram Kishore Sen and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Nov-17-1964
Reported in : AIR1965Cal282
..... india to a foreign power therefore a parliamentary statute was not necessary in addition to the amendment of the first schedule of the constitution the question of amending article ..... parliament reiatable to article 3 of theconstitution sufficient for implementation of the agreement relating toexchange of enclaves or is an amendment of the constitution in accordancewith article 368 of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJatIn Chakravorty Vs. Mr. Justice Himansu Kumar Bose and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jun-25-1964
Reported in : AIR1964Cal500,68CWN958
..... amendment of the constitution part 20 of the constitution consists of only one article namely article 368 which lays down the procedure for amendment of the constitution the relevant provisions of the said article run as follows 368 an amendment of this constitution ..... the amendment the parliament is empowered to present the amendment to the president for assent we cannot rewrite article 368 by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPaban Chandra Majumdar Vs. Dulal Ghosh and anr.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Nov-25-1964
Reported in : AIR1965Cal387,1965CriLJ90
whereby he acquitted the accused persons charged under section 324 indian penal coderead with section 24 of the cattle trespass act produce evidence relevant in a case on the otherhand the power of the court in this respondent isvery wide and the before under section 251a xi of the code of criminal procedure 2 the point of law as involved in this case contention as raised by mr bhattacharya in this regard cannot therefore be accepted 4 the rule is accordingly made absolute the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMannalal Ratanlal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, CalcuttA.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-05-1964
Reported in : [1965]58ITR84(Cal)
934 rupees one thousand and nine hundred and thirty four constituted an allowable deduction against the 1 3rd share of income this is a reference under section 66 1 of the indian income tax act 1922 the assessment year is 1952 53 tax is not part of an expenditure of an assessee therefore the interest that is paid by the assessee on any
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSen Mahasay and anr. Vs. Corporation of Calcutta
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Aug-20-1964
Reported in : AIR1966Cal203,1966CriLJ525
that license should be obtained for manufacture and sale of articles as mentioned in rule 50 ibid mr roy choudhury has in which food is sold and are served a restaurant therefore if we refer to the dictionary meaning eating house means
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKinkar Ray Vs. the State
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-22-1964
Reported in : AIR1965Cal635,1965CriLJ741
railway servant cannot be convicted under section 120 of the indian railways act section 120 is quoted below if a person of a railway he is punishable under section 120 the scope of section 120 is wider there are decisions of various by railway companies offences by railway servants other offences and procedure the sections under the first and the last heads are accused persons tried to assault the complainant on the evidence therefore it is not possible to hold that the prosecution has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLalit Mohan Dey Vs. Smt. Satadalbasini Dasi
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-16-1964
Reported in : AIR1965Cal55
being only a form of such assent vide karnani industrial bank ltd v province of bengal 1951 2scr560 it would be of section 5 of the above act which vests exclusive jurisdiction in the matter of such ejectment with the thika tenancy the same the holding under the above statutory holding over therefore would not be a holding under the said original lease
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubodh Kumar Talukdar Vs. Tincowrie Sen
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-18-1964
Reported in : AIR1965Cal67,68CWN989
a case therefore an application under section 5 of the indian limitation act need be moved before the bench by the by any provision of the limitation act so also the power of the registrar under rule 2 18 of chapter ii under order xl1 rule 1 of the code of civil procedure the memorandum of appeal shall be accompanied by a copy such as has happened in the instant case 16 we therefore allow the application direct that f a t 202 and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhusan Chandra Paul and ors. Vs. Bengal Coal Co. Ltd.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-07-1964
Reported in : AIR1966Cal63
service of notice under section 4 of the act after amendment of the definition of the term intermediary by including within
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMd. Bashir Vs. Abdul Fazl Siddiqui
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-08-1964
Reported in : AIR1965Cal209
uncertain and violates the provisions of section 29 of the indian contract act in other words it is argued that the instance it is not argued that the solicitor had no authority to accept the tender but that the date of payment of order 21 rule 2 of the code of civil procedure the adjustment referred to in order 21 rule 2 is be no point in making payment and obtaining the admission therefore the date of payment can be shown not to have
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT