Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: kolkata Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 258 results (1.727 seconds)Santosh Kumar Roy and Others Etc. Vs. State of West Bengal and Others
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-17-1997
Reported in : AIR1997Cal168
by the parties in terms of article 299 of the constitution of india inasmuch as power to revise rent has been of its jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india has a limited role to play while exercising its power thus attracts section 23 of the indian contract act or article 14 of the constitution of india it is difficult to has no other option but to hold that such a power exists and can be exercised in a reasonable manner the would be open to the petitioners to question the validity therefor before an appropriate forum keeping in view the quantum of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Chairman, Calcutta Port Trust and ors Vs. Starlon Works Private Lt ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Sep-18-1997
Reported in : AIR1998Cal49,(1998)1CALLT63(HC)
writ application in this court under article 226 of the constitution the learned single judge vide the judgment under appeal passed it shall be for the board either to encash the bank guarantee if it finds that the petitioner is not entitled petitioner he filed a writ application in this court under article 226 of the constitution the learned single judge vide the judge after interpreting the section in the manner mentioned above therefore held that since the board cannot retain goods in its
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDipak Kumar Das Vs. Mrinal Kanti Roy and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-17-1997
Reported in : AIR1998Cal139
iv by any non compliance with the provisions of the constitution or of this act or of any rules or orders and magistrates c members of the armed forces of the union d members of the police forces e excise officers f annexed to the petition which clearly bring it within the purview of section 100 1 d and the court cannot overlook
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBuddheswar Ghosh and ors. Vs. Ekkari Ghosh and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-10-1997
Reported in : (1997)2CALLT43(HC)
transactions have been given judicial recognitions as very common in india the onus to prove benami has been accepted to be benami transaction prohibition act apply thirdly even if pleadings are amended the benamdar not being the member of the joint family
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshit Baran Chatterjee Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-12-1997
Reported in : (1997)2CALLT82(HC)
direct re delivery of the premises under it s inherent powers under section 151 of the code of civil procedure 24 inherent powers under section 151 of the code of civil procedure 24 having regard to the above and since i am
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhusudan Sen and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-21-1997
Reported in : (1997)2CALLT229(HC)
militates against the documentary evidence and section 92 of the indian evidence act comes into play so which one is to the conviction and sentence under section 302 34 indian penal code passed in the judgment in sessions trial no 12 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSudhir Kumar Pal Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-18-1997
Reported in : (1997)1CALLT444(HC)
respondent no 5 who is stated to be the appropriate authority to appoint the petitioner as the m r distributor of locality the appellant writ petitioner applied in accordance with the procedure prescribed for appointment of m d distributor by the department
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSheikh Rahman Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jan-07-1997
Reported in : (1997)1CALLT463(HC)
said order in a proceeding under article 226 of the constitution 8 appearing for the private respondent no 5 mr arun not interfere with the said order in a proceeding under article 226 of the constitution 8 appearing for the private respondent any decree or order of a court tribunal or other authority mr adhikari urged that having regard to the said provision not to obliterate the effect of the findings of the civil courts in earlier proceedings and such findings could be relied after thought mr mitra urged that the writ petition was therefore devoid of merit and was liable to be dismissed 13
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMerchants of Traders (P) Ltd. Vs. Sarmon Pvt. Ltd.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jan-14-1997
Reported in : (1997)2CALLT418(HC)
are not unmindful about the fact of furnishing of a bank guarantee of rs 15 lakhs by the defendants appellants in or by bank guarantee or by real properties within the jurisdiction of the said court during the pendency of the appeals with interest under order 37 of the code of civil procedure on deposit of rs 30 lakhs with the registrar original
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSamir Paramanick Vs. State of West Bengal
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-04-1997
Reported in : 1997CriLJ2447
author of the alleged crime under section 302 of the indian penal code 14 in short we hold that there was the alleged crime under section 302 of the indian penal code 14 in short we hold that there was no evidence the water but behind the back of the convict appellant therefore this piece of circumstantial evidence also has lost its importance
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT