Rajasthan Jodhpur Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhup Ram Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4644/2012 Bhup Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. Rakesh Matoria, for the petitioner. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. Mr. N.K. Bohra, for the complainant. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.125/2011, of Police Station- Hanumangarh Town for the offence u/s 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co- accused, namely, Bheem Sen has already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate bench of this Court vide the order dated 29.03.2012, and the case of the petitioner, Bhup Ram is not distinguishable from the case of co-accused- Bheem Sen. He, therefore, prayed that petitioner may also be e...
Basti Ram and anr Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4628/2012 Basti Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. B.K. Vyas, for the petitioners. Mr. A.R. Nikub, PP for the State. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioners were arrested in connection with FIR No.28/2012, of Police Station- Nosra, District Jalore for the offence u/s 147, 148, 149, 323 and 307 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in judicial custody since 21.04.2012, however, the counsel for the petitioners does not press the present bail application qua the petitioner No.1- Basti Ram S/o Lal Ram, against whom allegations have been levelled by the injured for inflicting injury on his head. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits t...
Gurdeep Singh and ors Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4460/2012 Gurdeep Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:22. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA, V.J.Mr. M.K. Garg, for the applicants. Mr. Ashok Prajapat, PP for the State. -- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.2. An FIR (89/2012) has been registered inter-alia against the applicants herein for commission of offences under Sections 307, 323, 341, 447, 147, 148 and 149 of IPC at Police Station- Kesharisinghpur.3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits the co- accused persons, namely, Jarnail Singh, Tara Singh and Roop Singh @ Roopvasant have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 14.06.2012 passed by a Coordinate Bench in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4155/2012. It is submitted that the case against the present accused applicants is not d...
Ghisu Lal Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4466/2012 Ghisulal Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:22. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA, V.J.Ms. Anju Chouhan on behalf of Mr. P.N. Mohanani, for the applicant. Mr. Ashok Prajapat, PP for the State. -- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor.2. An FIR (93/2012) has been registered inter-alia against the applicant herein for commission of offences under Sections 332, 353, 225 of IPC at Police Station- Pratap Nagar, Bhilwara.3. Having regard to the nature of accusation, the gravity of the offence, material on record and taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the present case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not inclined to extend protection under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to the applicant.4. Accordingly, the application pr...
Chunni Lal Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4219/2012 Chunni Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:22. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA, V.J.Mr. T.R.S. Sodha, for the applicant. Mr. K.R. Bishnoi, PP for the State. Mr. M.S. Sheikh, for the complainant. -- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor.2. An FIR (96/2012) has been registered inter-alia against the applicant herein for commission of offences under Sections 420, 406 of IPC at Police Station- Bhilwara Sadar, District Bhilwara.3. Having regard to the nature of accusation, the gravity of the offence, material on record in support thereof and taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the present case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not inclined to extend protection under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to the applicant. Accordingly, the application preferred...
Ramesh @ Durga Ram Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4481/2012 Ramesh @ Durgaram Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:22. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA, V.J.Mr. D.N. Yadav, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Prajapat, PP for the State. -- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.2. An FIR/CR (46/2012) has been registered inter-alia against the applicants herein for commission of offences under Sections 498-A, 323 and 324 of IPC at Police Station- Mahila Thana, Pali.3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant and the complainant contacted 'Nata' marriage and at the time of said marriage, no dowry articles were taken. The applicant is behind the bars for last 7-8 days and, therefore, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the applicant may be en...
Gauri Shanker Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4472/2012 Gauri Shankar Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:22. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA, V.J.Mr. S.S. Gour on behalf of Mr. R.S. Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. -- Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this bail application at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application filed on behalf of applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is rejected as not pressed. (SANGEET LODHA), V.J.DJ/- S-53...
Ram Prasad and anr Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4173/2012 Ram Prasad & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:22. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA, V.J.Mr. Sunil Ranwah, for the applicants. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. Mr. Suhil Kumar, for the complainant. -- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.2. An FIR (80/2012) has been registered inter-alia against the applicants herein for commission of offences under Sections 323, 326 and 307 of IPC at Police Station- Kuchera, District Nagaur.3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that initially the case was registered against the applicants for bailable offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323 and 341 IPC, however, later on offences under Sections 326 and 307 were added. Learned counsel for the applicant further subm...
Smt. Latika Patil Vs. Municipal Board, Mount Abu and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6358/2012 Smt. Latika Patil Vs. Municipal Board, Mount Abu & Anr. Date of Order:19. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA, V.J.Mr. R.K. Rathi, for the petitioner. -- Learned counsel for the seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to make appropriate application before the learned Additional District Judge, Abu Road for early consideration of the application preferred for temporary injunction. Petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. (SANGEET LODHA), V.J.DJ/- S-83...
Bhanwar Lal Vs. State (Revenue) and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-19-2012
1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6359/2012 Bhanwar Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order:19. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA, V.J.Mr. Manish Pitaliya, for the petitioner. -- Learned counsel for the seeks permission to withdraw with liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned transfer order before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal. Permission granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. (SANGEET LODHA), V.J.DJ/- S-84...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »