Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gauri Shanker Vs. State

Gauri Shanker vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Jun 22, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973417

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gauri Shanker

Respondent

State

Excerpt

1 of 1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order s.b. criminal misc. bail application no.4472/2012 gauri shankar vs. state of rajasthan date of order:22. 06/2012. present hon'ble mr. justice sangeet lodha, v.j.mr. s.s. gour on behalf of mr. r.s. choudhary, for the petitioner. mr. mahipal bishnoi, pp for the state. -- learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this bail application at this stage. accordingly, the bail application filed on behalf of applicant under section 439 cr.p.c. is rejected as not pressed. (sangeet lodha), v.j.dj/- s-53

Full Judgment

1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4472/2012 Gauri Shankar Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:

22. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA, V.J.

Mr. S.S. Gour on behalf of Mr. R.S. Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. -- Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this bail application at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application filed on behalf of applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is rejected as not pressed. (SANGEET LODHA), V.J.

DJ/- S-53

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial