Full Judgment
28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.
Mr. Rakesh Matoria, for the petitioner. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. Mr. N.K. Bohra, for the complainant. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.125/2011, of Police Station- Hanumangarh Town for the offence u/s 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co- accused, namely, Bheem Sen has already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate bench of this Court vide the order dated 29.03.2012, and the case of the petitioner, Bhup Ram is not distinguishable from the case of co-accused- Bheem Sen. He, therefore, prayed that petitioner may also be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is not entitled for bail. Having regard to the nature of accusation and taking 2 of 2 into consideration totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant, Bhup Ram S/o Lal Chand, by cate Sharma, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.125/2011 of Police Station- Hanumangarh Town, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), V.J.
DJ/- 74