Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chunni Lal Vs. State

Chunni Lal vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Jun 22, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973421

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chunni Lal

Respondent

State

Excerpt

1 of 2 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order s.b. criminal misc. bail application no.4219/2012 chunni lal vs. state of rajasthan date of order:22. 06/2012. present hon'ble mr. justice sangeet lodha, v.j.mr. t.r.s. sodha, for the applicant. mr. k.r. bishnoi, pp for the state. mr. m.s. sheikh, for the complainant. -- 1. heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned public prosecutor.2. an fir (96/2012) has been registered inter-alia against the applicant herein for commission of offences under sections 420, 406 of ipc at police station- bhilwara sadar, district bhilwara.3. having regard to the nature of accusation, the gravity of the offence, material on record in support thereof and taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the present case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i am not inclined to extend protection under section 438 cr.p.c. to the applicant. accordingly, the application preferred by the applicant under section 438 cr.p.c. is hereby rejected.4. however, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is ready to surrender before the concerned court, which may consider his bail application on the same day. 2 o”5. taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice, it is directed that if the applicant-chunni lal, surrenders before the concerned court on or before 03.07.2012, the court concerned shall consider his bail application, preferably on the same day in accordance with law. (sangeet lodha), v.j.dj/- s-72

Full Judgment

1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4219/2012 Chunni Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:

22. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA, V.J.

Mr. T.R.S. Sodha, for the applicant. Mr. K.R. Bishnoi, PP for the State. Mr. M.S. Sheikh, for the complainant. -- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor.

2. An FIR (96/2012) has been registered inter-alia against the applicant herein for commission of offences under Sections 420, 406 of IPC at Police Station- Bhilwara Sadar, District Bhilwara.

3. Having regard to the nature of accusation, the gravity of the offence, material on record in support thereof and taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the present case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not inclined to extend protection under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to the applicant. Accordingly, the application preferred by the applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is hereby rejected.

4. However, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is ready to surrender before the concerned court, which may consider his bail application on the same day. 2 o”

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice, it is directed that if the applicant-Chunni Lal, surrenders before the concerned court on or before 03.07.2012, the court concerned shall consider his bail application, preferably on the same day in accordance with law. (SANGEET LODHA), V.J.

DJ/- S-72

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial