Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Lal Sahani Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28757 of 2011 Ram Lal Sahani Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Taking into consideration that alleged occurrence took place in the year, 1999 and the petitioner could be arrested on 15-04-2011 and furthermore, in course of investigation, alleged articles were recovered from the house of the petitioner and the said articles were identified by the informant and some witnesses in test identification parade and furthermore, the petitioner carries criminal antecedent, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Chakiya P.S. Case No. 120 of 1999 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 427 of 2011 pending in the court of 4th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Moatihari is, hereby, rejected. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar ...
Upendra Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41588 of 2011 (03) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41588 of 2011 ====================================================== Upendra Prasad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nachiketa Jha-Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kr. Roy- A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANDHATA SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANDHATA SINGH23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no doubt, he is assailant of the deceased, but death is eight days after the incident. For the incident, a counter version is also there viz. Paharpur P.S. Case No.182 of 2010, which may be taken as free-fighting between the parties and a s...
Badan Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1191 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1191 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Badan Singh 2. Hridya Narayan .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 13.11.2011 in a case registered under Sections 25(1)a, 25(1- b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. From the hotel of Jawahar Singh, one country made pistol along with two A.K.-47 rifle, cartridges and other arms were recovered. The petitioners were apprehended from the place of seizure. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners were just a customer of the hotel and in fact no recovery...
Sathu Pandit Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF J UDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3487 of 2012 Sathu Pandit Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 23.01.2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional P.P. for the State. There has been unsuccessful attempt in removing rice and wheat from PACS godown which was kept for distribution as flood relief amongst affected persons. Informant himself claimed to be Panchayat Sachiv of the locality. However, from the written report itself, it is evident that some sort of allegations happens to be there against the Mukhiya who insisted for distribution of the food-grains in spite of his denial in the background of pre-occupation. Petitioner happens to be under custody since 12.10.2011. Under the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner, namely, Sathu Pandit is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C...
Rahul Ojha Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3300 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3300 of 2012 ====================================================== Rahul Ojha, son of Brijbhan Ojha, resident of Village- Nimej, P.S. Brahampur, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Brahampur P.S. Case No. 188 of 2011, registered for offence under Sections 447, 504, 379, 385 and 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The occurrence took on the pretext that the petitioner along with three others came to the shop of the informant and asked the servant of the informant to get tight the chain of the motorcycle. However, the servant of the informant shows his inability. It is also allege...
Santu Baitha Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2130 of 2012 ====================================================== Santu Baitha .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Petitioner being Ex-Mukhiya is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 420 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioner that he took Rs. 3000/- as gratification out of the first installment of Indira Awas Yojana of Rs. 15,000/-. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the case has been lodged after two and half years of the alleged occurrence and the petitioner earlier lodged a case against the informants son. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Santu Baitha, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Co...
Vinit Kumar @ Bhonu Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2073 of 2012 Vinit Kumar @ Bhonu Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.2070 of 2012 Vinit Kumar @ Bhonu Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 23.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The same petitioner is apprehending arrest in two cases for the same offence; one registered under sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and the other under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 332, 333, 427, 452, 323, 307, 435, 436, 380 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. It appears that the occurrence is of 4.2.2009 and two FIRs were lodged; one as Giriyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case no. 25 of 2009 and the other as Giriyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case no. 24 of 2009 where accusations are of taking away of cartridges and service revolver and raising slogans, damaging the prope...
Harihar Rai Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16594 of 2010 (4) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16594 of 2010 ====================================================== Harihar Rai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mr. Baban Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN23. 01-2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner appears and submits that prosecution has been instituted in the matter which involves a pure civil dispute and is not maintainable as such. It has been pointed out that the petitioner is the landlord living on the ground floor of the property in question and the informant is the tenant living on the first floor of the same building. The informant has claimed that she has ...
Md. Furquan HussaIn Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40965 of 2011 ====================================================== Md. Furquan Hussain .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel representing the parties. During course of the day, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the complainant as opposite party no.2. Issue notice to opposite party no. 2 to show cause as to why this application be not heard and preferably disposed of at the time of admission stage itself. Requisites for service of notice under both processes, ordinary as well as under registered post with acknowledgement due must be filed within one week from today, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Let the matter...
Prabhakar Kumar Kushwaha Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.249 of 2011 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.249 of 2011 ====================================================== Prabhakar Kumar Kushwaha .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Anshuman, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Puspa Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY) 2. 23-01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 22.9.2010 passed by J.M.F.C., Patna in Domestic Violation Case No. 10 of 2010. According to the petitioner a petition for compromise has been filed before the trial court and he has already returned the materials as has been clai...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »