Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vinit Kumar @ Bhonu Vs. the State of Bihar

Vinit Kumar @ Bhonu vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975925

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinit Kumar @ Bhonu

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2073 of 2012 vinit kumar @ bhonu versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- with criminal miscellaneous no.2070 of 2012 vinit kumar @ bhonu versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 23.1.2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the same petitioner is apprehending arrest in two cases for the same offence; one registered under sections 395 and 397 of the indian penal code and the other under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 332, 333, 427, 452, 323, 307, 435, 436, 380 and 120b of the indian penal code and sections 3 and 4 of the prevention of damage to public property act. it appears that the occurrence is of 4.2.2009 and two firs were lodged; one as giriyak (katrisarai) p.s. case no. 25 of 2009 and the other as giriyak (katrisarai) p.s. case no. 24 of 2009 where accusations are of taking away of cartridges and service revolver and raising slogans, damaging the properties and litting fire in the police station premises respectively. the accusations are not specific against the petitioner. in the first case the petitioner was named while in the second case the petitioner was not named. lodging of the two cases for the one occurrence creates doubt about the prosecution version as to why both the accusations have not 2 been incorporated in one fir. it appears that other similarly situated accused persons have been granted bail. considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner in two applications be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs.10000/(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of c.j.m. nalanda at biharsharif in giriyak (katrisarai) p.s. case nos. 25 and 24 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. anil/ (dinesh kumar singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2073 of 2012 Vinit Kumar @ Bhonu Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.2070 of 2012 Vinit Kumar @ Bhonu Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 23.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The same petitioner is apprehending arrest in two cases for the same offence; one registered under sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and the other under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 332, 333, 427, 452, 323, 307, 435, 436, 380 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. It appears that the occurrence is of 4.2.2009 and two FIRs were lodged; one as Giriyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case no. 25 of 2009 and the other as Giriyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case no. 24 of 2009 where accusations are of taking away of cartridges and service revolver and raising slogans, damaging the properties and litting fire in the police station premises respectively. The accusations are not specific against the petitioner. In the first case the petitioner was named while in the second case the petitioner was not named. Lodging of the two cases for the one occurrence creates doubt about the prosecution version as to why both the accusations have not 2 been incorporated in one FIR. It appears that other similarly situated accused persons have been granted bail. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner in two applications be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Nalanda at Biharsharif in Giriyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case Nos. 25 and 24 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Anil/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial