Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rahul Ojha Vs. the State of Bihar

Rahul Ojha vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975909

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rahul Ojha

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.3300 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.3300 of 2012 ====================================================== rahul ojha, son of brijbhan ojha, resident of village- nimej, p.s. brahampur, district- buxar. .... .... petitioner. versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party. coram: honourable mr. justice gopal prasad oral order (per: honourable mr. justice gopal prasad”23. 01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. the petitioner has been arrested in connection with brahampur p.s. case no. 188 of 2011, registered for offence under sections 447, 504, 379, 385 and 387/34 of the indian penal code. the occurrence took on the pretext that the petitioner along with three others came to the shop of the informant and asked the servant of the informant to get tight the chain of the motorcycle. however, the servant of the informant shows his inability. it is also alleged that accused persons took the ceiling fan from the shop of the informant and they demanded rs. 5,00,000/- as rangdari. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation about demand of rs. 5,00,000/- from the informant patna high court cr.misc. no.3300 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 appears to be absurd as shop of the informant is motorcycle repairing shop and the petitioner is in custody since 07. 12.2011. however, learned court below observed that there is criminal antecedent against the petitioner. under the facts and circumstance of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, buxar, in connection with brahampur p.s. case no. 188 of 2011, subject to the condition that petition shall file hajri in the nearest police station once in a week. (gopal prasad, j.) m.p.

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3300 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3300 of 2012 ====================================================== Rahul Ojha, son of Brijbhan Ojha, resident of Village- Nimej, P.S. Brahampur, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Brahampur P.S. Case No. 188 of 2011, registered for offence under Sections 447, 504, 379, 385 and 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The occurrence took on the pretext that the petitioner along with three others came to the shop of the informant and asked the servant of the informant to get tight the chain of the motorcycle. However, the servant of the informant shows his inability. It is also alleged that accused persons took the ceiling fan from the shop of the informant and they demanded Rs. 5,00,000/- as Rangdari. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation about demand of Rs. 5,00,000/- from the informant Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3300 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 appears to be absurd as shop of the informant is motorcycle repairing shop and the petitioner is in custody since 07. 12.2011. However, learned court below observed that there is criminal antecedent against the petitioner. Under the facts and circumstance of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Brahampur P.S. Case No. 188 of 2011, subject to the condition that petition shall file Hajri in the nearest police station once in a week. (Gopal Prasad, J.) m.p.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial