Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Harihar Rai Vs. the State of Bihar and anr

Harihar Rai vs The State of Bihar and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975636

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harihar Rai

Respondent

The State of Bihar and anr

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.16594 of 2010 (4) dt.23-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.16594 of 2010 ====================================================== harihar rai .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar & anr .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. mr. baban roy for the opposite party/s : mr. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice vikash jain oral order (per: honourable mr. justice vikash jain”23. 01-2012 learned counsel for the petitioner appears and submits that prosecution has been instituted in the matter which involves a pure civil dispute and is not maintainable as such. it has been pointed out that the petitioner is the landlord living on the ground floor of the property in question and the informant is the tenant living on the first floor of the same building. the informant has claimed that she has entered into an agreement with the petitioner for purchase of the property which however, the petitioner denies and in respect of which title eviction suit no.55/2010 has been filed for the purpose of evicting the informant which is said to be pending before the sub judge-i, patna. notices have been issued to the o.p.no. 2 and has patna high court cr.misc. no.16594 of 2010 (4) dt.23-01-2012 appeared through vakalatnama, but no one is present to contest the petition today. let this matter be placed under the heading for orders tomorrow the 24th january, 2012. (vikash jain, j.) chandran

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16594 of 2010 (4) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16594 of 2010 ====================================================== Harihar Rai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mr. Baban Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN”

23. 01-2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner appears and submits that prosecution has been instituted in the matter which involves a pure civil dispute and is not maintainable as such. It has been pointed out that the petitioner is the landlord living on the ground floor of the property in question and the informant is the tenant living on the first floor of the same building. The informant has claimed that she has entered into an agreement with the petitioner for purchase of the property which however, the petitioner denies and in respect of which Title Eviction Suit No.55/2010 has been filed for the purpose of evicting the informant which is said to be pending before the Sub Judge-I, Patna. Notices have been issued to the O.P.No. 2 and has Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16594 of 2010 (4) dt.23-01-2012 appeared through Vakalatnama, but no one is present to contest the petition today. Let this matter be placed under the heading For Orders tomorrow the 24th January, 2012. (Vikash Jain, J.) chandran

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial