Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhim Mukhia and ors Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33680 of 2011 ====================================================== 1.Bhim Mukhia, Son of Sri Shital Mukhia. 2.Bidyadhar Mukhia, Son of Sri Anirudh Mukhia. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary up to paragraph 100 dated 10/11/2011. The two petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In this case, instituted against two others, petitioners name emerged during investigation for taking money for opening of account etc. and allegation, as stated, is aga...
Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23425 of 2010 (6) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23425 of 2010 ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN23. 01-2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though application for leave for the petitioner has been made the same remained pending with the employer of the petitioner and as such in the absence of leave being granted he is unable to present himself before this Court today. The O.P.No. 2 is personally present who has been interviewed and she has stated quite unequivocally that she is prepared to consider for a comp...
Md. Aslam Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3155 of 2012 Md. Aslam, sonof Md. Qaiyum @ Kuyum Ansari, resident of village Khaja Nagar, Puraini South, P.S. Jagdishpur, district Bhagalpur .. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .. Opposite party **** /2/ 23 January, Heard learned counsel for the petitioner 2012 and the State. This is a petition for regular bail for offence under Section 498A of the Penal Code. There is allegation that the marriage solemnized about fourteen years back and has been blessed with three children and there is allegation the wife driven out after assault and even in Panchayati Rs.3,000/- was ordered to paid to the wife has not been honoured by the petitioner. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint 2 Case No. 650 of 2009 to the satisf...
Ramayan Pandey and anr Vs. Ram Pravesh Pandey and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.177 of 1983 Ramayan Pandey & Anr Versus Ram Pravesh Pandey & Ors ---------------------------------- 23. 23.01.2012 Perused the office note dated 18.1.2012. It appears that by terms of order dated 16.1.2012 when the office note was placed that the appeal has been dismissed against the respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 7 therefore, whether the appeal will proceed or not, this Court directed that the incompentency matter may be considered at the time of final hearing of the appeal. Today the office has pointed out that the respondent Nos.2 and 8 to 10 have already died and as far back as on 5.2.2001 the appellants were directed to take steps for substitution but it has not been taken. Therefore, now there is no respondent at all in this appeal. In such view of the matter, the whole appeal has now become incompetent, as such it is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)...
Brahmadeo Sharma and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1014 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Brahmadeo Sharma S/O Late Kailash Sharma Resident of Village Pandey Tola, P.S. Bheldi, District Saran.2. Manoj Sharma S/O Brahamadeo Sharma Resident of Village Pandey Tola, P.S. Bheldi, District Saran.3. Uday Sharma S/O Brahamdeo Sharma Resident of Village Pandey Tola, P.S. Bheldi, District Saran.4. Ganesh Sharma S/O Rajeshwar Sharma Resident of Village Makhdumganj, P.S. Chapra Muffasil, District Saran. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH) 02/ 23-01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 30.8.2011 in a case registered under Sections 25(1) (B) (A)/26/35 of the Arms Act. From the poss...
Bal Brind Prasad @ Bal Govind Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1055 of 2012 ====================================================== Bal Brind Prasad @ Bal Govind Prasad, S/o Budh Narayan Mahto R/O Vill.-Narari, P.S.-Tharthari, Distt.-Nalanda .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH) 02/ 23-01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the father of the husband of the victim is in custody since 30.9.2011 in a case registered under Sections 304B, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is for dowry demand and killing the victim within two years of the marriage. The informant has alleged that the death took place on 19.5.2011 in the hospital when the complaint was lodged on 10.6.2011 and it is submitted that the husband is in custody. Considerin...
Bhikhari Sahni Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38655 of 2011 Pawan Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar with Criminal Miscellaneous No.39982 of 2011 Bhikhari Sahni Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------23. 01-2012 Both the above-said Cr. Misc. Cases arise out of Town P.S. Case No. 76 of 2010 registered under Section-396 of the IPC and accordingly, both the above- said petitions are being disposed of by this common order. Counsel for the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 38655 of 2011 is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion in course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are not named in the first information report but their name came in this case in course of investigation and, allegedly, some looted mobiles were recovered from the house of petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 38655 of 2011 but learned counsel appearing for the aforesaid petitioner drew my c...
Nand Kishore Ram Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38521 of 2011 Nand Kishore Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is in jail custody since 21-12- 2010 in a case registered under Section-302 & other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code as well as 27 of the Arms Act. The alleged occurrence is said to have taken place in the year, 2003 and the petitioner could be remanded in the year, 2010 but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that almost, all the co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail by another benches of this court and so far as petitioner is concerned, it is only stated that he alongwith other co- accused caught hold of the deceased at the time of alleged occurrence. It is further contended by him that main assailant, namely, Sri Kant Singh has already been released on bail. Considering...
Maina Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3168 of 2012 Maina Singh, Son of Anil Singh, resident of village Manjhauli-2 Tola Kachahri, Police Station Cheria Bariarpur, District Begusarai. ............. Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ........... Opp. Party. ---------------------------------- 02/ 23.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for the offence under Sections 392 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner has not named in the First Information Report and the only material against the petitioner is the confessional statement of the co-accused Manoj Mishra @ Harhara and the co- accused Manoj Mishra @ Harhara has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 12.10.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 31867 of 2011. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail...
Raju Mahto Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39831 of 2011 Raju Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 28-05-2011 in a case registered under Sections-366, 366A, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code but in course of investigation, it came to light that the deceased had gone alongwith the petitioner to Ludhiana where she committed suicide. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the deceased was major at the time of alleged occurrence but on account of some family feud, she committed suicide at Ludhiana. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner, namely, Raju Mahto is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Rauta P. S. C...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »