Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bhim Mukhia and ors Vs. the State of Bihar

Bhim Mukhia and ors vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975757

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhim Mukhia and ors

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

.....are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 406, 420 and 34 of the indian penal code. in this case, instituted against two others, petitioners name emerged during investigation for taking money for opening of account etc. and allegation, as stated, is against the named accused persons out of whom petitioner no. 3 was one, who has been apprehended and prayer as regard to him has 2 patna high court cr.misc. no.33680 of 2011 (4) dt.23-01-2012 2/2 already been withdrawn earlier. further, petitioners have no role nor have any criminal antecedents. if, it is so, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, madhepura, in connection with madhepura p.s. case no. 71 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under section 438 (2) of the code of criminal procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (akhilesh chandra, j.) praveen-ii/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33680 of 2011 ====================================================== 1.Bhim Mukhia, Son of Sri Shital Mukhia. 2.Bidyadhar Mukhia, Son of Sri Anirudh Mukhia. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary up to paragraph 100 dated 10/11/2011. The two petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In this case, instituted against two others, petitioners name emerged during investigation for taking money for opening of account etc. and allegation, as stated, is against the named accused persons out of whom petitioner no. 3 was one, who has been apprehended and prayer as regard to him has 2 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33680 of 2011 (4) dt.23-01-2012 2/2 already been withdrawn earlier. Further, petitioners have no role nor have any criminal antecedents. If, it is so, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 71 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) Praveen-II/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial