Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramayan Pandey and anr Vs. Ram Pravesh Pandey and ors

Ramayan Pandey and anr vs Ram Pravesh Pandey and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975773

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramayan Pandey and anr

Respondent

Ram Pravesh Pandey and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna first appeal no.177 of 1983 ramayan pandey & anr versus ram pravesh pandey & ors ---------------------------------- 23. 23.01.2012 perused the office note dated 18.1.2012. it appears that by terms of order dated 16.1.2012 when the office note was placed that the appeal has been dismissed against the respondent nos. 1, 3 to 7 therefore, whether the appeal will proceed or not, this court directed that the incompentency matter may be considered at the time of final hearing of the appeal. today the office has pointed out that the respondent nos.2 and 8 to 10 have already died and as far back as on 5.2.2001 the appellants were directed to take steps for substitution but it has not been taken. therefore, now there is no respondent at all in this appeal. in such view of the matter, the whole appeal has now become incompetent, as such it is dismissed. s.s. (mungeshwar sahoo, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.177 of 1983 Ramayan Pandey & Anr Versus Ram Pravesh Pandey & Ors ---------------------------------- 23. 23.01.2012 Perused the office note dated 18.1.2012. It appears that by terms of order dated 16.1.2012 when the office note was placed that the appeal has been dismissed against the respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 7 therefore, whether the appeal will proceed or not, this Court directed that the incompentency matter may be considered at the time of final hearing of the appeal. Today the office has pointed out that the respondent Nos.2 and 8 to 10 have already died and as far back as on 5.2.2001 the appellants were directed to take steps for substitution but it has not been taken. Therefore, now there is no respondent at all in this appeal. In such view of the matter, the whole appeal has now become incompetent, as such it is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial