Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hazi Tabarak HussaIn Alias Tabarak Hussian Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1590 of 2013 with A.B.A. No. 2637 of 2013 Mahendra Prasad Singh.........Petitioner ( in ABA 1590/13) Hazi Tabarak Hussain @ Tabarak Hussain ......Petitioner ( in ABA 2637/13) Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party ( in both cases) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. B.M. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Mohit Prakash ( in ABA 1590/13) Mr. C.S. Prasad, ( in ABA 2637/13) For the State: Mr. A.K. Pandey ,APP ( in both cases) For the Informant: Mr. Zafar Alam ( in both cases) 6/30.07.2013: It is alleged that petitioner Mahendra Prasad Singh sold 03 decimals of land to complainant through Sale Deed dated 16.08.2004. When the complainant applied for mutation before the Circle Officer, Sadar, Hazaribagh, her application for mutation has been rejected on the ground that the land in question is Gairmajarua Khas land and the land was not entered in the name of petitioner and/or his predecessors in Register-II...
Smt Lakhia Devi Alias Lakhia Devi and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2085 of 2013 ----- 1. Smt. Lakhia Devi @ Lakhia Devi 2. Mani Mandal @ Manoj Mandal 3. Bhekh Lal Mandal 4. Mahendra Mandal 5. Binod Mandal 6. Tribhhuvan Mandal 7. Ram Krishn Mandal 8. Yudhisthir Mandal 9. Nageshwar Mandal 10.Murli Mandal 11.Nirmal Mandal Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioners : Sri. Arwind Kumar For the State : Sri.Arun Kr.Pandey,No.4, A.P.P. ----- 04/30.07.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Lakhia Devi @ Lakhia Devi, Mani Mandal @ Manoj Mandal, Bhekh Lal Mandal, Mahendra Mandal, Binod Mandal, Tribhhuvan Mandal, Ram Krishn Mandal, Yudhisthir Mandal, Nageshwar Mandal, Murli Mandal and Nirmal Mandal is moved by Sri. Arwind Kumar , learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri. Arun Kr. Pandey No.4 , Addl P.P. for the State. There is general and omnibus allegation that petitioners pressed the neck o...
Ghazala Tanveer Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt (Cvl.) Case No. 873 of 2012 Ghazala Tanveer ...... Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand and others ...... Respondents/O.Ps. ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Ruby Parween, Adv. For the Respondents/O.Ps.: Mr. Rajesh Shankar, G.A. Mr. R.R. Nath, (RMC) Order No.12 Dated 30th July, 2013. Learned Court Commissioner submits that samples of the materials from the road in question has been taken and for testing the samples, about two weeks may take. It is further submitted that the name of retired Engineer- in- Chief is Mr. Bira Ram, whereas in the order dated 12.07.2013 the name has been mentioned as Mr. Veera Ram. The said name in the order dated 12.07.2013 be read as Mr. Bira Ram and he is retired Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. This fact is taken note of. As prayed, list this matter after four ...
Ganesh Swarnkar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1612 of 2013 Ganesh Swarnkar .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: None For the State: Mr. P.K. Jaiswal,APP 6/30.07.2013: No body appears on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed for non prosecution. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Pratap Binjhia Alias Pratap Singh Alias Narendra Singh Vs. the State o ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5423 of 2013 ------- Pratap Binjhia @ Pratap Singh @ Narendra Singh . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Mohit Prakash For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 30.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jaldega P.S. Case No. 31 of 2006, corresponding to G.R. No. 381 of 2006, S.T. No. 02 of 2010, for the offence under Sections 307/ 323/ 324/ 326/ 333/ 353/ 120-B/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Section 3/ 4 of the Explosive Substance Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Though the petitioner is named in the F.I.R., but it is pointed out that the other co-accused persons who had faced the trial have been acquitted by the Trial Court. The judgement of the Trial Court has been brought on record as Annexur...
Charo Oraon Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 4538 of 2013 ------- Charo Oraon . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Arvind Kumar Singh For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 3/ 30.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bero P.S. Case No. 150 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 6821 of 2012, S.T. No. 189 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 302/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 the Arms Act. The case relates to murder of the husband of the informant and the case was instituted against four named accused persons including the petitioner due to enmity. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has prayed for bail. Learned counsel for the State upon going through the case diary has submitted t...
Sangeeta Jaiswal Vs. Subodh Jaiswal
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tr. Petition (Civil) No. 10 of 2013 Sangeeta Jaiswal .... .. Petitioner Versus Subodh Jaiswal ...... Opp. Party --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : M/s. Vikash Kishore, Adv. For the Opp. Party : - -- 3/30.07.2013 Petitioner by way of filing the present petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking transfer of M.T. Suit No.117 of 2011 filed by the opposite party under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for the restitution of conjugal rights from the court of learned Principal Judge, Family court, Hazaribagh to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on perusal of material placed on record, issue urgent show cause notice to opposite party by registered post with A/D as well as ordinary process, for which requisites etc. must be filed by within one week. The notice is made returnable after four weeks. In the mea...
Awadh Kumar Singh Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(S)No.1139of2006 AwadhKumarSingh ... Petitioner Versus CentralCoalfieldsLtd.andors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.R.Anand FortheRespondents :Mr.AK.Mehta 1130.7.2013 Herdlearnedcounselfortheparties.2. The petitioner has sought quashing of a letter dated 20th August,2005,Annexure16,wherebytherespondentshaverefusedthe claimofthepetitionerforpaymentofIOD(injuryonduty)wages.He hasfurtherprayedforadirectiontothe respondentstoreleaseIOD wagesfortheperiodfrom14thMay,2003to28thFebruary,2005.3. Thematterwasheardonthelastoccasionandtherespondents were directed to bring on record any document in support of their statementsmadeinthecounteraffidavitthatafterbeingdeclaredfit the petitioner had resumed duty on 14th May,2003. For better appreciation,theorderdated1.4.2013isquotedhereinbelow:1. 4.2013 The respondents have appeared and objectedtheclaimofthepetitionerforgrantofinjuryon duty wages (IOD Wages)beyond 14th ...
Yudhisthir Mahato Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5459 of 2013 ------- Yudhisthir Mahato . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Ranjan Kumar For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 30.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chowka P.S. Case No. 67 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 1037 of 2012, S.T. No. 85 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Section 13 of the U.A.P. Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. From the F.I.R. it appears that there was an encounter between the police party and the members of the extremists group in the night and in the morning the petitioner was apprehended alongwith the other co-accused. There is no recovery of fire arm from the petitioner. In the facts of this ca...
Rekha Kumari Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A No. 136 of 2012 Rekha Kumari ...... Appellant Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant: Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Adv. M/s Sarfraz Akhtar & Rita Kumari For the Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, G.P. V Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Adv. ------ Dated 30th July, 2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The appellant-petitioner is aggrieved against the dismissal order of writ petition dated 16th January, 2012. Hence, this L.P.A.3. Detailed facts of the case may not be necessary, in view of the fact that undisputedly the appellant- petitioner was appointed on the post of teacher and was given charge of warden of one school, Kasturba Gandhi Girls School, Pathna, Sahibganj. There were some allegations that because of dispute between the appellant- petitioner and one Supriya Bharti, the environment in the school and hostel is becoming very bad, for w...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »