Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kula Nand Tahkur Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 4556 of 2009 Kula Nand Thakur ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to G.P. III --- I.A. No. 4733 o08. 30-07-2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of W.P.S. No. 4556 of 2009. It has been submitted that petitioner has retired and he has not got his due pensionary benefits due to pendency of the writ petition. The matter is extremely urgent. Learned J.C. to G.P. III has no objection in fixing an early date of hearing of the writ petition. Considering the grounds mentioned in the application, this I.A. is allowed. Office is directed to list W.P.S. No. 4556 of 2009 under the heading "For Admission" on 24th September, 2013. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Kedar Mahato Vs. Labour
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No. 1704 of 2013 --- Kedar Mahato --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Labour & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. M.K. Laik, Sr. Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Ananda Sen & Mr. A.K. Verma, Advocates --- 06/ 30.07.2013 Heard counsel for the parties.2. The prayer made in the writ application is to direct the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, Dhanbad to decide the reference referred to it by the Central Government vide Notification dated 22nd November 2012 (Annexure-2) in the following terms: Whether the action of the management of Bhowra (N) U.G. Mines of M/s BCCL in dismissing Sri Kedar Mahato from the services of the company w.e.f 8/9.12.1994 is legal and justified? To what relief is the workman concerned entitled? 3. From perusal of the notification and upon hearing the counsel for the parties, it a...
Gora Chandra Das Vs. Home Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.7136 of 2012 with I.A. no.4728 of 2013 Gora Chandra Das . Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioner : Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to A.G. ----- 5/30.07.2013 In I.A. no.4728 of 2013, the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) no.7136 of 2012 in the light of the order issued by Memo no.379/B dated 18.6.1997 by the Deputy Commissioner, Chaibasa(Annexure-A to the counter affidavit). The petitioner has filed the writ petition for a direction on the respondents to give status and pay-scale of Class-IV employees to the petitioner, as has been given to other similarly situated Chawkidars. It has been submitted that by order, contained in Annexure-A to the counter affidavit, the petitioner has been given pay-scale of Class-IV employees along with others. But letters have not been issued to the concerned authorities for giving...
Navjeewan Grih Nirman Samitee Limited Th Its Honourary Sec Sri K V Sub ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 341 of 2013 --- Navjeewan Grih Nirman Samitee Limited--- --- ---- Petitioner Versus Singhbhum District Central Cooperative Bank Limited, Chaibasa & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, Advocate --- 06/ 30.07.2013 Heard counsel for the parties.2. This matter has earlier been adjourned at least on three occasions to ascertain the fact as to whether the petitioner-society was interested in making a suitable offer for purchase of six flats in question which are supposed to be auction sold by the respondent Bank.3. The petitioner had approached this Court for quashing the Memo No. 28 dated 10th February 2012 which was related to finalization of sale made in favour of the respondent no. 6 in respect of Flat No. B04/08 situate at Phase-II, Baridih, belonging to the petitioner society. Further prayer ha...
Amjad Kuraisi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5458 of 2013 ------- Amjad Kuraisi . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Md. Faruque Ansari For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 4/ 30.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State, as also learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Daltonganj Sadar (Town) P.S. Case No.576 of 2012, corresponding to G.R No.2228 of 2012, for the offence under Sections 302 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The case relates to murder of the husband of the informant and the informant is the eye witness to the occurrence. There is direct allegation in the F.I.R. against the petitioner to have assaulted the deceased by fire arm. There is allegation against other co-accused persons also to have assaulted the deceased. Learned counsel for ...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Salkhan Murmoo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cont. Case (Cr.) No. 05 of 2012 Courts on its own Motion ....... Petitioner Versus Salkhan Murmoo & Ors. ....... Opposite Parties ............. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ....... For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate For the State : J.C. to A.A.G. ............ 10/Dated:30. h July, 2013 Oral Order: Per D.N. Patel. J.:1. Counsel appearing for the Bar Association, Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi, is seeking time to reply the affidavit filed by the opposite parties.2. Time as prayed for is granted.3. The matter is adjourned to be listed on 27th August, 2013.4. All the opposite parties shall remain personally present before this Court at 10.30 a.m. on the next date of hearing.5. Registry is directed to show the name of Additional Advocate General Mr. Ajit Kumar on behalf of State of Jharkhand. (D.N. Patel, J.) (Shree Chandrashekhar, J) Tanuj/Satyarthi...
Binu Jaiswal Alias Binu Kumar and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1898 o1. Binu Jaiswal @ Binu Kumar 2.Rinku Soundik @ Rinku Saindika 3.Ajay Swarankar 4.Robert Gupta 5.Vikash Vishwakarma @ Vikash Kumar 6.Gayan Prakash @ Gayan Prakash Gupta 7.Sudhir Swarnakar @ Sudhir Prasad Swarnakar 8.Ashok @ Alok Gupta @ Ashok Prasad 9. Amit Kumar @ Amit Gupta ...................................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand ...................................... . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr.Binod Singh For the State :A.P.P 2.30.7.13. I.A.No.5214 of 2013 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that initially this case was filed for quashing of the FIR of Hariharganj P.S. Case no.64 of 2013. While the matte was pending, orders were passed on 11.6.2013 and 11.7.2013 whereby warrant of arrest non-bailable as well as processes were ordered to be issued r...
Uma Shankar Pathak Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 5192 of 2010 Uma Shankar Pathak ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to G.P. I --- I.A. No. 5213 o06. 30-07-2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of W.P.S. No. 5192 of 2010. It has been submitted that petitioner has been put under suspension from 2006 and subsequently terminated. The petitioner is out of service and is facing acute hardship. Learned J.C. to G.P. I has no objection in fixing an early date of hearing of the writ petition. Considering the grounds mentioned in the application, this I.A. is allowed. Office is directed to list W.P.S. No. 5192 of 2010 under the heading "For Admission" on 24th September, 2013. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Central Coalfields Limited and ors Vs. Kohinoor Steel Pvt Limited Thro ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI L.P.A.No.107of2013 CentralCoalFieldsLtd.&Anr. .... .... .... Appellants Versus KohinoorSteelPvt.Ltd.&Ors. .... .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellants :Mr.AnoopKumarMehta,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.IndrajitSinha,Advocate th OrderNo.06 Dated,30 July,2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Orderdated27thFebruary,2013isaninterimorderand thecasehasalreadybeenfixedbytheCourtafterfourweekswhich period has already been expired and according to the learned counsel for the respondent, the appellant has already decided to complytheorderimpugned. Inviewofabove,itisnotafitcaseforentertainingthe L.P.A.Hence,thisL.P.A.isdismissed. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J.) SI/Anit...
Satya Kumari and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5451 of 2013 ------- 1. Satya Kumari 2. Rajni Kumari . Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioners : : M/s. Kripa Shankar Nanda For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 30.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Bolba P.S. Case No. 8 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 188 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 333/ 353/ 307/ 212/ 216/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 the Arms Act. There is allegation that the petitioners were having some affairs with the co-accused, the members of the extremists group. It is alleged that the police was informed that the co-accused had visited the house of the petitioners, whereupon the raid was conducted and there was encounter between the extremists and the police, but the extremists managed to...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »