Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tata Aig Life Insurance Co Ltd and Anr. vs Thonupunuri Manemma
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1995/2023, CM APPL. 62636/2023 & CM APPL. 51611/2025 TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE CO LTD AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Joydip Bhattacharya, Adv. (through VC)versusTHONUPUNURI MANEMMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Karthikey Suyal, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that thepetitioners want to approach the jurisdictional High Court against the impugned order dated 25th October, 2023 passed by the learned National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in Revision Petition bearing no. 2477/2023. Accordingly, it is prayed that liberty be granted to file the appropriate petition in the jurisdictional High Court, within a period of one month from today. It is further prayed that the interim stay granted videorder dated 05th December, 2023 be extended for a period of one mon...
Karan vs State Govt. of Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3377/2025 KARAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yogesh Kumar, AdvocateversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State. SI Isha, PS Prem Nagar Mr. Manish, Advocate for the Prosecutrix, alongwith the Prosecutrix in Person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.20261. The applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. District Rohini, under Sections 363/376/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012.2. After some arguments, Mr. Yogesh Kumar, learned counsel for theapplicant, seeks permission to withdraw this application. However, he seeks a direction for expeditious disposal of the proceedings before the learned Sessions Court.3. Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, assures that no unnecessary adjournments shall be sought on behalf of the prosecution ...
Bir Singh Rathore vs Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 5102/2025 & CRL.M.A. 22082/2025 BIR SINGH RATHORE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chirag Madan, Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal, Ms. Rachael Tuli, Mr. Ronit Bose & Mr. Sai Krishna Kumar, Advocates.versusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya NyayaSanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of an order on charge dated 27.03.2025 and the order framing charges under Section 120B read with Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, dated 01.07.2025, passed by the learned Special Judge (PC Act).2. Mr. Chirag Madan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,submits that the petitioner expired on 06.12.2025. He has handed over a copy of the order dated 19.12.2025 passed by the learned Spec...
Rajwati vs Shri K K Shukla (Since Decased) Through Lr. Shri Devendra K ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 3182/2024&CM APPL. 47131/2024 RAJWATI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Advocate.versusSHRI K K SHUKLA (SINCE DECASED) THROUGH LR. SHRI DEVENDRA KUMAR SHUKLA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manvi Gupta, Advocate (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition hasbecome infructuous, as the matter stands settled between the parties and the suit has already been disposed of. It is, accordingly, prayed that the present petition be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J APRIL 29, 2026/v/abkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified fr...
Ravi @ Golu vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2830/2025 RAVI @ GOLU .....Applicant Through: Mr. Vikas Yadav, AdvocateversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Ms.Upasna Bakshi, Advocates alongwith SI Udit, PS Ranhola Mr. Sarthak Karol, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Ms. Neelakshi Bhadauria, Ms. Tanishka Pawar and Mr. Shashank Sharma, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. By virtue of the present application, the applicant seeks grant ofregular bail in the case arising out of FIR No.789/2024 dated 18.11.2024 registered at PS: Ranhola under Sections 109(1)/61(2)/190/191(2)/191(3)/ 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nayaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw the present application.3. As such, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn. SAURABH BANERJEE, J APRIL 29,...
Rajendra Shakyawer vs Vikram Bansiwal
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 240/2025, CM APPL. 50574/2025 & CM APPL. 1053/2026 RAJENDRA SHAKYAWER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Mr. Naman Arora, Mr. Vishant Prakash, Advs.versusVIKRAM BANSIWAL .....Respondent Through: Ms. Neetu Gupta, Ms. Harshita Jain, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. An affidavit of undertaking dated 23.04.2026 by the petitioner has been placed on record, wherein it has been stated as under: -1. That the Deponent is the Petitioner in the above-captioned Petition and in terms of the order dated 25.02.2026, Deponent undertake to vacate the premises A-8772, Roshanara Road, Delhi- 110007 on or before 31.12.2026. Deponent further undertake to pay the regular electricity bills and shall pay the statutory rent of Rs. 200 per month.2. That the Deponent, vide registered lease deed (annexedherewith as Document 1), has given the shop on rent in the ...
Mohd. Shahid vs Nazreen Malik
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 29th April, 2026 + CM(M) 1993/2025 & CM APPL. 64594/2025 MOHD. SHAHID .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Madan Lal Sharma, Ms. Tejaswini Verma, Ms. Manika Gaba and Mr. Vikrant Malwal, Advocates.versusNAZREEN MALIK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Diwan Singh, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner/defendantunder Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 02nd August, 2025 passed by the learned Trial Court in Suit No. 179/2013, whereby the right of the petitioner to lead his evidence was closed. The petitioner further impugns the subsequent order dated 08th August, 2025, whereby the application seeking review of the order dated 02nd August, 2025 was also dismissed.3. Heard. Record perused.4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner...
Vivek Arora & Anr. vs Ishv Realtors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1349/2025 VIVEK ARORA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dhruv Kapur and Mr. Maharshi Kaler, AdvsversusISHV REALTORS PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pawash Piyush, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition inasmuch as a settlement agreement is stated to have been arrived at between the parties.2. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 29, 2026/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 11:30:26...
Ms Dermaclinix the Complete Skin and Hair Solution Center vs Additiona ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13739/2025 & CM APPL. 56385/2025 M/S DERMACLINIX THE COMPLETE SKIN AND HAIR SOLUTION CENTER .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not givenversusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DELHI EAST .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek, Sr. Standing Counsel (Through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 29.04.20261. It is claimed that after having taken recourse to the alternate remedy, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.2. The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.3. Liberty is granted to approach afresh in case cause to that effect arises.4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J APRIL 29, 2026 gs/avThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is dow...
Axon Medical Solutions Pvt. Ltd vs Grena (Qingdao) Medical Devices Ltd ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 957/2025 & I.A. 22171/2025 AXON MEDICAL SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocates.versusGRENA (QINGDAO) MEDICAL DEVICES LTD & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj and Ms. Urvi Nama, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 29.04.20261. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking a decree ofpermanent injunction restraining the Defendants from using the mark GRENA as a trademark which is identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs mark in any manner whatsoever so as to result in violation of Plaintiffs statutory and common law rights, amongst other reliefs.2. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff, on instructions, seeks to withdrawthe present suit in light of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Copy of the Settlement Agreement dated 08.04.2026 is handed over in Court and is taken on record.3. Accord...