Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India vs Dr. Nautan Thakur
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6691/2019, CM APPL. 28190/2019 UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Akansha Choudhary, Ms.Sonia Rana and Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocates.versusDR. NAUTAN THAKUR .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.20261. The Petitioner, sought quashing and setting aside the decision dated26.03.2019 passed by the Central Information Commission (CIC), whereby, the Second Appeal preferred by the Respondent was allowed and the Petitioner was directed to disclose the information sought.2. The Respondent filed an RTI Application dated 10.07.2017 beforethe Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the Ministry of Civil Aviation (MCA), seeking copies of entries files, including note sheets and various letters and documents exchanged between the MCA and other departmental offices, in relation to the proposed disinvestment of Air India.3. The CPIO rejected the RTI application vide reply ...
C.K Enterprises vs Kathuria Plastic Products and Stationery Mart
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 520/2023 & I.A. 7795/2025 C.K ENTERPRISES .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vikas Khera, Mr. Rohit and Ms. Anoushka Mishra, Advocates.versusKATHURIA PLASTIC PRODUCTS AND STATIONERY MART .....Defendant Through: Mr. Karan Jain, Ms. Vaishali Yadav, Mr. Pushpak Shukla, Ms. Ayushi Kapoor and Ms. Deepali Goel, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 29.04.20261. At the insistence of this Court under Rule 37 of the Delhi High Court Intellectual Property Rights Division Rules, 2022, both the parties were directed to explore the possibility of settlement.2. At the post-lunch session, the learned counsel for the parties informed that the parties have been able to resolve their disputes.3. Learned counsel for the parties state that the defendant is ready andwilling to suffer a decree in terms of sub-para (a) of para 35 of the suit. They further state that the defendant has agreed to pay a nominal cost of Rs.75,000/...
Sonu Kumar Mandal vs the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3526/2024 SONU KUMAR MANDAL .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusTHE STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with SI Satish Kumar, No.1022-D, P.S. Raj ParkCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. The learned APP for the State informs this Court that the parties are not present today.2. On the last date of hearing also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter any further.4. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.5. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J APRIL 29, 2026/ns/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 11:52:21...
Mr Sd Kulesh vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4170/2022, CRL.M.A. 17172/2022 MR SD KULESH .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advs. Mr. Vijay Kasana and Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advs. for R-2 SI- Rahul Tomar, PS: EOWCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. There is no appearance on behalf of the applicant.2. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2, on the other hand, submitsthat since the Closure Report has already been filed by the Police in the concerned case, the present petition wherein the petitioner is seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the respondent no.2 has itself become infructuous.3. Learned APP for the State confirms the aforesaid position.4. In any event, in the interest of justice, renotify on 23.07.2026. SAURABH BANERJEE, J APRIL 29, 2026/AbThis is a digitally signed order. The authent...
Madhur Jain vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~20-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3689/2025, CRL.M.A. 16222/2025, CRL.M.A. CRL.M.A. 6828/2026 MADHUR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Verma, Mr. Abheesht Sharma, and Ms. Abhinandini Sharma, Advocates alongwith Petitioner in person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Sanjay Kumar and SI Sushil Kumar. Respondent No. 2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 45/2023 dated 31.05.2023, registered at Police Station Economic Offences Wing, Delhi, under Sections ground of settlement between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned Additional PublicCRL.M.C. 3689/2025 Page 1 of 7 Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of ...
Daniel Alexander Foley vs Union of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6410/2024 and CM APPL. 26626/2024, CM APPL. DANIEL ALEXANDER FOLEY .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Amit George, Mr. Dhiraj Abraham Philip, Mr. Febin Mathew Varghese, Mr. Dushyant Kishan Kaul, Ms. Soyarchon Khangrah, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman CGSC With Mr. Akash Mishra Arnav Mittal, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.20261. The paragraph no. 6 of the short-affidavit filed by respondents-Unionof India indicates that the period of black-listing is already over on 08.04.2026. The paragraph 6 is extracted as under: 6. That it is further clarified that the 180 days stay stipulation means that cumulative stay of a foreign national in a calendar year (starting 1st January every year) should not exceed 180 days in India regardless of his number of entries in India. If the stay exceeds beyond 180 days, then the foreigner is required to register himself with ...
Rashmi Dua vs Prudence School (Formerly Presidium School), Through Its ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9295/2023 RASHMI DUA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Gupta, Mr. Prince Manchanda and Ms. Kanika Gupta, Advocates.versusPRUDENCE SCHOOL (FORMERLY PRESIDIUM SCHOOL), THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/MANAGEMENT & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Savita Malhotra and Ms. Suman Malhotra, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 29.04.20261. During the course of hearing, counsel for the parties, on instructions,submit that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement. In terms thereof, the Respondent School shall pay a total sum of 6,25,000/- to the Petitioner within a period of three months from today, in three instalments. The first instalment shall be paid by second week of May, 2026; the second instalment shall be paid by second week of July, 2026; and the third instalment shall be paid by second week of August, 2026. In the event ...
Pooja Verma and Ors. vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~53, 55 to 64* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8827/2025, CM APPL. 37724-26/2025 & 38701/2025 DIMPLE ARORA AND ORS .....Petitioners Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AO + W.P.(C) 8831/2025, CM APPL. 37734-36/2025 & CM APPL. POOJA VERMA AND ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 8832/2025, CM APPL. 37740-42/2025 & 38703/2025 SUMAN LATA BHARDWAJ AND ORS. .....Petitioners Signed By:ANUBHAV W.P.(C) 8827/2025 Page 1 of 6 + W.P.(C) 8833/2025, CM APPL. 37746-48/2025 & 38704/2025 RUCHI KAUSHIK AND ORS .....Petitioners ORS ....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs. + W.P.(C) 8834/2025, CM APPL. 37752-54/2025 & 38705/2025 ABDUR REHMAN AND ORS .....PetitionersORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8835/2025, CM APPL. 37784-86/2025 & 38706/2025 CHANDER MOHAN AND ORS. .....Petitioners Signed By:ANUBHAV W.P.(C) 8827/2025 Page 2 of 6 ORS. ....Respondents Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. + W.P.(C) 8836/2025, CM APPL. 37790-92/2025, 38707/2025 & DIVAKER SINGH AND...
Saurabh Dass and Ors vs Government of Nct Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~53, 55 to 64* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8827/2025, CM APPL. 37724-26/2025 & 38701/2025 DIMPLE ARORA AND ORS .....Petitioners Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AO + W.P.(C) 8831/2025, CM APPL. 37734-36/2025 & CM APPL. POOJA VERMA AND ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 8832/2025, CM APPL. 37740-42/2025 & 38703/2025 SUMAN LATA BHARDWAJ AND ORS. .....Petitioners Signed By:ANUBHAV W.P.(C) 8827/2025 Page 1 of 6 + W.P.(C) 8833/2025, CM APPL. 37746-48/2025 & 38704/2025 RUCHI KAUSHIK AND ORS .....Petitioners ORS ....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs. + W.P.(C) 8834/2025, CM APPL. 37752-54/2025 & 38705/2025 ABDUR REHMAN AND ORS .....PetitionersORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 8835/2025, CM APPL. 37784-86/2025 & 38706/2025 CHANDER MOHAN AND ORS. .....Petitioners Signed By:ANUBHAV W.P.(C) 8827/2025 Page 2 of 6 ORS. ....Respondents Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. + W.P.(C) 8836/2025, CM APPL. 37790-92/2025, 38707/2025 & DIVAKER SINGH AND...
Madhu Grover vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 5484/2022, CRL.M.A. 24456/2022 MADHU GROVER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kalash Pandey and Mr. Rishi Tutu, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Mr. Gourav Singh, Advocates Mr. V. P. Singh and Mr. Shubham, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 482 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner seeks quashing of CC No.15239/2018 registered under Sections 138/142 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 primarily on the ground that the signature on the concerned cheque is not of the petitioner herein.2. Since, the same, prima facie, is a matter of trial and is to be urged before the learned Trial Court, the present petition is per se not maintainable.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, without adverting to the merits involved,...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »