Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Haseeb Khan and Ors vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5933/2026 & CM APPLs. 29171-29172/2026 HASEEB KHAN AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, Ms. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey and Mr. Vijay Rajput, Advocates.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh and Ms. Laqshyaa Saluja, Advocates for R-2. Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, CGSC with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Ms. Nyasa Sharma and Mr. Ankit Khatri, Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 29.04.20261. The present petition assails order dated 24th April, 2026 bearing No.SDM/BDR/STF/Demolition/2026/544-549 issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Badarpur), District South-East, Revenue Department, GNCTD, acting as Convenor of the Special Task Force, whereby demolition of certain structures situated at Village Jaitpur, New Delhi, on land comprised in Khasra Nos. 757, 770, 781 (part), 782 (part) and 768, falling w...
Suraj Kumar vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1395/2026 SURAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun K. Srivastava and Mr. G.S. Panwar, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Criminal) with Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13426/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(CRL) 1395/20262. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiaread with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying for a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus seeking the production of Mr. Suraj Kumar, the petitioner herein, who is stated to be in illegal detention.3. In the petition, it is claimed that certain persons, stated to befrom Police Station Samaypur Badli, Delhi and Bangalore Police had forcibly entered into the house of the pet...
Lalit Batra vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~103-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3292/2026 LALIT BATRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harshit Shishodia, Mr. Lalit Tyagi & Mr. Shivam Kumar, Advocates.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State SI Rahul Ranjan, PS Harsh Vihar. Mr. Sanjeet Trivedi, Advocate for R-2/BSES. [M:-9899357421, Enrl. No. B-394/2002]CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13375/2026 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3292/20261. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 545/2024, dated 04.10.2024, registered at Police Station Harsh Vihar, District North East, Delhi, under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, [the Electricity Act] and al...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs Ram Prakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5835/2026, CM APPL. 28668/2026 & 28669/2026 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Uday N. Tiwary, Mr. Akshat Tiwary and Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Advs.versusRAM PRAKASH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Mittal and Mr Shaurya Mittal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT (ORAL)% 29.04.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The respondent was appointed as a driver with the Delhi Transport Corporation1 in 1984.2. Vide Resolution Number 84 of 1998 dated 26 June 1998, theDTC resolved to enhance the age of retirement of its employees from 58 years to 60 years with effect from 27 May 1998, subject to their being found fit after a medical examination conducted after they attain the age of 55 years.3. In 2015, the respondent underwent surgery for carcinoma of the 1 the DTC hereinafter W.P.(C) 5835/2026 Page 1 of 11 mouth, whereafter he was assigned light duty of a Gate Time ...
Rani and Anr. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3300/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13398/2026 RANI AND ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nisha Bee, AdvocateversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State/R-1 SI Meenakshi and SI Aayush, PS Jama MasjidCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.04.20261. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner, without prejudice toher rights and contentions, seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. Present petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed.3. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.4. Pending application also stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.MANOJ JAIN, J APRIL 29, 2026/dr/syThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 11:44:03...
Ambience Commercial Developers Pvt Ltd vs Kaur Cookies Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 359/2026 & I.A. 12020/2026 AMBIENCE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sanjoli Gupta, Adv. (through VC).versusKAUR COOKIES PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nilava Bandyopadhyay & Mr. Shreeyash Tiwari, Advs. (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 29.04.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by three months.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J APRIL 29, 2026/JKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is d...
Browns College of Elementary Education vs National Council for Teacher ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5821/2026 BROWNS COLLEGE OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Ms. Ritu Vats, Advs.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.04.2026 CM APPL. 28643/2026 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 5821/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (a) quashing of Impugned withdrawal order dated 17.05.2025 issued by Respondent No. 2, thereby, withdrawing recognition of the Petitioner Institution for running the D.EL.ED. course;(b) direct the respondent no.2 to issue restoration of both therecognition orders dated 05.08.2005 and 10.09.2012 to the petitioner institution, thereby restoring its recognition with all consequential benefits of being a reco...
Sagar Gandhi & Ors. vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 29th April, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3271/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13293/2026 SAGAR GANDHI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Surinder Singh Tiwana with Mr.Karnail Singh and Ms. Tamanna, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Avinash Pratap, PS Hazrat Nizammudin. Mr. Jaideep Sethi with Mr. Anurag Jain, Mr. Garuav Gupta, Mr. Abhinay Gupta and Ms. Vyomika Mutreja, Advocates for respondent No.2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 283/2023 dated proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) andpetitioner No.1 was solemnized on 04.09.2022 as per Hindu rites and customs. However, the parties lived separately and respondent No.2 did not accompany petitioner to his home, even after marriag...
Kishore Kumar vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3299/2026 KISHORE KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashwat Tyagi with Ms. Rashmi Mishra, Advocates.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. SI Satish Singh, P.S.: Shakarpura.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13392/2026 Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3299/2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks a direction to the investigating officer calling for a status report with respect to the investigation in case FIR No.344/2019 dated 24.10.2019 registered under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at P.S.: Shakarpur, East District, Delhi.2. Mr. Shashwat Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits, thatthe FIR dates back to 2019 and was filed against M/s Supertech Limited in ...
Ms Sarr Freights Corporation vs Rites Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5812/2026, CM APPL. 28617/2026 and CM APPL. MS SARR FREIGHTS CORPORATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Seth, Mr. Sumer Dev Seth, Ms. NeelamPreet Kaur, Mr. Abhiroop Rathore, Mr. Kabir Dev, Mr. Sukhvir Singh, Advs.versusRITES LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Mr. Rajkumar Maurya, Mr. Krishna Chaitanya, Mr. Divyansh Singh Dev, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that thetechnical bid of the Petitioner has been rejected by the Respondent subsequent to the filing of the present Petition. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition challenging the correctness of the said order passed by the Respondent.2. Learned counsel representing the Respondent submits that he has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel r...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »