Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D.C. Mishra vs Indian Council of Agricultural Research & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~68 to 70* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6467/2017 UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 6481/2017 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 6496/2017 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ORS .....Respondents W.P.(C) 6467/2017, W.P.(C) 6481/2017 & W.P.(C) 6496/2017 Page 1 of 5CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT (ORAL)% 29.04.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The order of the Tribunal which is under challenge in these writ petitions at the instance of the applicant before the Tribunal in OA The applicant, who has filed these Original Applications, appears in person seeks adjournment to argue the matter on some other date.2. It is seen from record that these are very old matters and on one pretext or the other have been adjourned day after day. Therefore, no further adjournment is allowed.3. I have gone through the files and the following clearly ar...
D.C. Mishra vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~68 to 70* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6467/2017 UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 6481/2017 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 6496/2017 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ORS .....Respondents W.P.(C) 6467/2017, W.P.(C) 6481/2017 & W.P.(C) 6496/2017 Page 1 of 5CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT (ORAL)% 29.04.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The order of the Tribunal which is under challenge in these writ petitions at the instance of the applicant before the Tribunal in OA The applicant, who has filed these Original Applications, appears in person seeks adjournment to argue the matter on some other date.2. It is seen from record that these are very old matters and on one pretext or the other have been adjourned day after day. Therefore, no further adjournment is allowed.3. I have gone through the files and the following clearly ar...
Sunil Kumar Soni vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 29th April, 2026 + W.P.(C) 9272/2017 SUNIL KUMAR SONI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Brahmanand Gupta, Advocate.versusTATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora, Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Advocates with Mr. Amit Singh, AGM (Legal).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALAMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral)1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:A. Direct respondent No. 1 to remove the high tension wires carrying electric current of 11000 volt from vicinity of the houses/buildings of the people of Pratap Vihar part- I, Kirari Suleman Nagar, Delhi-110086 and to take protective steps for preventing further disaster; and B. Direct the respondent No.l to pay a compensation of Rupees Ten Crore to the petitioner and his family for the loss of precious life of son of petitioner namely Luv Kumar Soni aged 27 years2. Briefly stated, the facts of the pre...
Subhash Chander vs Delhi Development Authority, Through Executive Engi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 29.04.2026 + ARB.P. 102/2026 SUBHASH CHANDER .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Rajasree Ajay, Advocate.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, Mr. Siddharth Goswami, Mr. Krish Bhatia and Mr . Aditya Sachdeva, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)1. The present Petition, under Section 11 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 19961, seeks the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes as are stated to have arisen inter se the parties in terms of Clause 25 of the Agreement dated 10.12.20222, as executed between the parties. The said clause reads as under:CLAUSE 25 Settlement of Disputes & Arbitration Except where otherwise provided in the contract, all questions and disputes relating to the meaning of the specifications, design, drawings, and instructions here-in-before mentioned an...
Sonu Alias Sanjay vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 146/2026 SONU ALIAS SANJAY .....Applicant Through: Ms. Aditi Singh, Mr. Himanshu Sharma and Mr. Prashant Kanojia, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP with WSI Meetu Yadav, PS Sangam Vihar Mr. Neeraj Kumar (DHCLSC) for complainant/prosecutrix.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks regular bailin FIR No. 130/2025, dated 05.03.2025, registered under Sections 64(1)/74/351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, at P.S. Sangam Vihar, District South, Delhi.2. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submits that although the prosecutrix has been examined, other material witnesses are yet to be examined before the Sessions Court.3. After some arguments, Ms. Aditi Singh, learned counsel for theapplic...
General Manager, Telecom District, Bsnl vs Vichitra Constructions Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 282/2026, CM APPL. 7746/2026, CM APPL. 7747/2026 CM APPL. 7748/2026 &CM APPL. 7749/2026 GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM DISTRICT, BSNL .....Petitioner Through Mr. M. C. Kochhar, Adv.versusVICHITRA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. ....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition to take appropriate remedy by way of an appeal before the appropriate forum.3. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J APRIL 29, 2026/sds/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DH...
Ns Trading vs Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4072/2026 NS TRADING .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary and Mr. Piyush Jain, Advs.versusCENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sumit K. Batra and Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Advs. (GNCTD) Mr. Akash Verma, SSC, CBIC with Ms. Aanchal Uppal, Adv. for R-2 & R-3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 29.04.20261. Since the petitioner has an alternate remedy of moving before the GSTAT Tribunal, we see no reason to entertain the present petition.2. Accordingly, the petition along with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of with liberty to approach the Tribunal. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J APRIL 29, 2026/ar/sgThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on...
Zubair & Anr. vs State (Gnctd) & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3306/2026 ZUBAIR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shivender Kumar Sharma, Ms. Urooj Chaudhary and Ms. Esha Sharma, AdvocatesversusSTATE (GNCTD) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State. Respondent no.2-in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13425/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3306/20263. By way of present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR bearing no. 87/2024, registered at Police Station Jamia Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections (hereafter IPC).4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.5. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer(IO) from Police Station Jamia Nagar, Delhi.6. Briefly s...
Dayal & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 + CRL.M.C. 1855/2026 DAYAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Virender Singh, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with IO/SI Jagmohan. Victim through videoconferencing. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 385/2022 of PS Ranhola for offence under Section 323/440/506/34 IPC on the ground that the victim (respondent no.2 herein) has compromised the disputes.2. The petition was initially listed before this court on 13.03.2026 and parties were directed to appear before the concerned Joint Registrar, where their statements were recorded.3. Today, after recording of statements matter has been listed before this CRL.M.C.1855/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca,ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,postalCode=110003, s...
Ram Babu Sharma & Ors vs Delhi Stock Exchange Ltd.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4782/2014 RAM BABU SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prem Kumar Singh, Adv. for Petitioner No.10.versusDELHI STOCK EXCHANGE LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Neeta Lodha, AR.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 29.04.2026 CM APPL. 72031/20241. Application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of Petitioner No.10 seeking withdrawal of his name from the present Writ Petition.2. For the reasons stated in the Application, the same is allowed and name of Petitioner No.10 is deleted from the Writ Petition.3. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 4782/20144. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that present Writ Petition seizes to be maintainable, as Respondent has been made into Private Limited Company and is not covered in definition of State now.5. Considering that the Respondent has become a Private Limited Company and do not come under definition of the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »