Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nisha Sharma & Anr. vs Arvind Kumar Gogia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 29th April, 2026 + CM(M) 4219/2024, CM APPL. 76356/2024 &CM APPL. 76357/2024 NISHA SHARMA &ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Saumya Tandon and Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocates.versusARVIND KUMAR GOGIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh Bawa and Mr. Nilesh Sawhney, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the judgment dated 05th March, 2024 passed by the learned Appellate Court in MCA DJ No. 20/2018.3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that that the presentpetition has become infructuous, as the main petition has already been disposed of vide judgment dated 17th March, 2025 passed by the learned Trial Court, and in the present petition, the challenge is to the interim order passed on the application under...
Akash @ Gadda vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4726/2025, CRL.M.A. 36427/2025 AKASH @ GADDA .....Applicant Through: Mr. Varun Dev Mishra, AdvocateversusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Ms.Upasna Bakshi, Advocates alongwith Insp. Sharad Kumar Bishnoi, ASI Jai Singh, PS SMRS Mr. Kamal Nayan Tiwari, Advocate for complainant alongwith complainant in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. By virtue of the present bail application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in FIR No.04/2025 dated 17.02.025 registered at PS: Sabji Mandi Railway Station, Delhi under Sections 103(1)/61(2)/ 109(1)/238/3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and under Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act (AA).2. Succinctly put, as per the case set up by the prosecution, as per intimation received on 17....
Mohd Mubarak vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4956/2025 MOHD MUBARAK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Mr. Narender and Mr. Raju Thakur, AdvocatesversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicantseeking grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No. 553/2019, registered at Police Station Prem Nagar, Delhi, for commission of offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC) and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereafter POCSO Act).2. Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution is that on 09.10.2019, aPCR call regarding sexual assault upon a girl was received at Police Station Prem Nagar. Thereafter, the prosecutrix, along with her parents, came to the police station, where a counsellor was called and her ...
Sohail Anwar Lone vs M/S Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1820/2026& CRL.M.A. 7468/2026 & CRL.M.A. 7471/2026 SOHAIL ANWAR LONE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Mr. Aman Qayoom Wani, Advocates (through V.C.)versusM/S TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Taniya Bansal, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel for respondent appears on advance notice and submits that complaint in question has already been withdrawn on 23.04.2026, citing some technical grounds.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the abovesaid fact and states that the present petition be disposed of, as having become infructuous.3. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of, as having become infructuous.4. Pending applications also stand disposed of. MANOJ JAIN, J APRIL 29, 2026 st/pbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the...
Mukesh Kumar and Ors vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~65 & 66* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19320/2025, CM APPL. 80642/2025 & 80644/2025 MUKESH KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Dr. Monika Arora, CGSC, Mr. + W.P.(C) 19440/2025, CM APPL. 81073/2025 & 81075/2025 RUBI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Dr. Monika Arora, CGSC), Mr.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT (ORAL)% 29.04.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR J.1. These writ petitions assail the following order passed by the Signed By:ANUBHAV W.P.(C) 19320/2025 and W.P.(C) 19440/2025 Page 1 of 4 Central Administrative Tribunal1: In this batch of OAs, the applicants seek the relief in the form of direction to the respondents to regularize their services.2. Reliance is placed upon a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi2, and judgment ofHonb'le High Court of Delhi in W.P (c) No. 6798/2002 titled SoniaGandhi & Ors. Vs. GNCTD & ors.3. The OAs are pending...
Raj Trehan vs Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5830/2026 RAJ TREHAN .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-Person (through VC).versusCENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi- Standing Counsel along with Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Kumari, Ms. Nehmat Sethi & Mr. Adnan Ashfaq Naqash, Advocates for CBSE.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 29.04.20261. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties.2. This Petition purportedly Public Interest Litigation Petition has beenfiled with a prayer seeking a direction to the Respondents to implement the directions issued by the Honble Supreme Court in Jigya Yadav (Minor) (Through Guardian/Father Hari Singh) v. C.B.S.E. (Central Board of Secondary Education) & Ors., (2021) INSC 303 Civil Appeal No. 3905 of 2011 decided on 03.06.2021.3. Mr. M.A. Niyazi, learned Standing Counsel representing the CentralBoard of Secondary Education (CBSE) has su...
Rubi and Ors vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~65 & 66* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19320/2025, CM APPL. 80642/2025 & 80644/2025 MUKESH KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Dr. Monika Arora, CGSC, Mr. + W.P.(C) 19440/2025, CM APPL. 81073/2025 & 81075/2025 RUBI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Dr. Monika Arora, CGSC), Mr.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT (ORAL)% 29.04.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR J.1. These writ petitions assail the following order passed by the Signed By:ANUBHAV W.P.(C) 19320/2025 and W.P.(C) 19440/2025 Page 1 of 4 Central Administrative Tribunal1: In this batch of OAs, the applicants seek the relief in the form of direction to the respondents to regularize their services.2. Reliance is placed upon a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi2, and judgment ofHonb'le High Court of Delhi in W.P (c) No. 6798/2002 titled SoniaGandhi & Ors. Vs. GNCTD & ors.3. The OAs are pending...
Anil Kumar @ Honey vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5003/2025 ANIL KUMAR @ HONEY .....Applicant Through: Mr. Jashanpreet Singh, Mr. Ashish Singh, Mr. Parvinder Kumar, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocates with SI Virender, P:S Kamla Market Mr. Sarthak Karol, SC with Ms. Neelakshi Bhadhauria, Ms. Tanishka Pawar, Advs. for LRs of deceasedCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present bail application.2. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. SAURABH BANERJEE, J APRIL 29, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 11:14:28...
Naushad Khan and Ors vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14978/2025, CM APPL. 61572/2025 & 61575/2025 VIDYA AND ORS .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 19538/2025, CM APPL. 81501/2025 & 81503/2025 NAUSHAD KHAN AND ORS .....PetitionersCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 29.04.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR J.1. Learned Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the judgmentof the Tribunal dated 18 September 2024, under challenge in these Signed By:ANUBHAV W.P.(C) 14978/2025 and W.P.(C) 19538/2025 Page 1 of 2writ petitions already stands quashed by this Court vide its judgmentdated 10 November 2025 in Pawan Sharma v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi1.2. However, Mr. Singh submits that Pawan Sharmas judgment is presently under challenge in the Supreme Court, though the SLP is yet to be listed.3. Nonetheless, as the matter is covered by the decision in Pawan Sharma and more particularly, since the impugned judgement already stands set aside in...
Haseena @ Lado vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 88/2026 HASEENA @ LADO .....Applicant Through: Mr. Amjad Khan, Mr. Mohd. Azhruddin and Mr. Amit Khowal, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocates with SI Pavan Kr, PS: Sunlight ColonyCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.20261. By virtue of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in proceedings arising out of FIR No.34/2017 dated 02.02.2017 registered at PS.: Sun Light Colony, Delhi under Sections the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act).2. Briefly put, as per prosecution, on 02.02.2017 the prosecutrix was produced at PS Sunlight Colony, Delhi by the staff of PS Hazarat Nizamuddin along wit...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »