Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jvrr Memorial College of Education vs Sh. Mukesh Kumar, Regional Direc ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1604/2025 JVRR MEMORIAL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Kant and Mr. Ayush Anand, Advs.versusSH. MUKESH KUMAR, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J. S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra and Ms. Tripta Sharma, Advs. for NCTE (through v/c)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition inasmuch as necessary compliance has been made by the respondents.2. The petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 29, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 11:30:24...
Mr Divesh Gupta vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14784/2025 and CM APPL. 60808/2025 MR DIVESH GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Dwivedi, Mr. G. L. Yadav and Mr. Pawan K. Yadav, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Kant Srivastava (Senior Panel Counsel) with Mr. Robert Laishram, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Ms. Zehra Khan, Advocate for R-3.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.20261. It appears that the petitioner earlier approached this Court for similarreliefs by way of two writ petitions bearing W.P.(C) No.9749/2009 and W.P.(C) 11048/2009. The first writ petitions came to be withdrawn on 01.07.2009 and, thereafter vide 21.08.2009 the second petition was dismissed, respectively.2. The order dated 01.07.2009 passed in W.P.(C) No.9749/2009 isAfter some hearing, counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the Civil Court or appropriate forum in acc...
Himanshu & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~23 Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 6939/2025, CRL.M.A. 6547/2026 HIMANSHU & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar and Mr. Rajesh Gautam, AdvocatesversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Udit Jain PS New Usmanpur Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate for Complainant.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.20261. The petitioners have approached this Court under Section 528 ofthe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 007/2017 dated 04.01.2017, registered at Police Station New Usmanpur, District North East, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 308/323/325/341/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground that the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled.2. The subject FIR, registered at t...
Pankaj Upadhyay vs the State (Govt. N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4421/2025 PANKAJ UPADHYAY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hitik Malhan, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (GOVT. N.C.T. OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Shaily Jain.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.04.20261. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR No. offences under Sections 64(2)/140(3)/316(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (corresponding sections 376/365/406 IPC).2. When the present matter was taken up by this Court on 18.11.2025, the following facts were recorded and it was also directed that no coercive action be taken against the applicant subject to his joining investigation.3. The relevant paras of the abovesaid order reads as under:-4. The case of the prosecution is that around 07 years ago the complainant met the accused (petitioner herein) in a wedding. Since then, the petitioner had been alluring her for marriage and forced her...
The Union of India vs Sh Shiv Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 + W.P.(C) 15006/2025 and CM APPL.27576/2026 THE UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, (CGSC) along with Mr. Sarvan Kumar (SPC) for UOI.versusSH SHIV KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amar Jain, Mr. Amritesh Mishra, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Nusrat Hossain, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTASACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)1. The present petition assails an award dated 24.05.2024 passed by the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 & Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), New Delhi, in Claim Application No.MWA-2. The said award/order has been passed in the context of a contractawarded by the petitioner to the respondent no.2 (M/s Professional Management Services) for providing outsourced manpower, including casual labourers, canteen attendants and a supervisor, for the period commencing 01.12.2018. The said contractual arrangement came ...
Vidya and Ors vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14978/2025, CM APPL. 61572/2025 & 61575/2025 VIDYA AND ORS .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 19538/2025, CM APPL. 81501/2025 & 81503/2025 NAUSHAD KHAN AND ORS .....PetitionersCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 29.04.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR J.1. Learned Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the judgmentof the Tribunal dated 18 September 2024, under challenge in these Signed By:ANUBHAV W.P.(C) 14978/2025 and W.P.(C) 19538/2025 Page 1 of 2writ petitions already stands quashed by this Court vide its judgmentdated 10 November 2025 in Pawan Sharma v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi1.2. However, Mr. Singh submits that Pawan Sharmas judgment is presently under challenge in the Supreme Court, though the SLP is yet to be listed.3. Nonetheless, as the matter is covered by the decision in Pawan Sharma and more particularly, since the impugned judgement already stands set aside in...
Pancham Karwal and Others vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
$~98 Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 7431/2025 PANCHAM KARWAL AND OTHERS .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Meghna Singh, Mr. Argha Roy, Mr. Anurag Singh, Advs.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State with IO Mr. Ashish Passi for R-2 with R-2 through VC.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13378/2026 (for early hearing)1. The petitioners have filed the present application seeking early hearing of the captioned petition, which is scheduled to be listed on 02.07.2026.2. For the reasons stated therein and with the consent of learned counsel for the respondents, the application is allowed and the petition is taken on Board.3. The application is accordingly disposed of. CRL.M.C. 7431/20254. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quas...
Salman vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4606/2025 SALMAN .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given).versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. ASI Om Prakash and ASI Sanjeev, ` P.S.: Civil Lines.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 29.04.2026 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file before the learned trial court. The petition is disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed-for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J APRIL 29, 2026/ak This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 11:48:02...
CARS24 Services Private Ltd vs Dreams Car
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 490/2025 CARS24 SERVICES PRIVATE LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gauhar Mirza, Mr. Kaveesh Nair and Ms. Karshana Agarwal, Advocates.versusDREAMS CAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Umang Dixit, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 29.04.2026 CCP(O) 15/2026 (u/s 11 & 12 CCP)1. There is a request for adjournment on behalf of learned proxycounsel for the Respondent on the ground that learned arguing counsel is currently on maternity leave, to which there is no objection by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner.2. At request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, list on 24.07.2026.HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.APRIL 29, 2026/tk/va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 12:26:44...
Dr Prabir Majhi vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 9042/2024 & CRL.M.A. 34650/2024 DR PRABIR MAJHI .....Petitioner Through:versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the FIR in the present case has already been quashed by the Honble Supreme Court, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous.2. Accordingly, the present petition, along with pending application, stands disposed of as having become infructuous.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J APRIL 29, 2026/zp/gjThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 11:52:01...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »