Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Parsvnath Developers Limited vs Rajgarhia Leasing and Financial Servic ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 259/2021 PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Saqib Ansari, AdvocateversusRAJGARHIA LEASING AND FINANCIAL SERVICE PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ravinder Singh and Ms. Raveesha Gupta, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 27.03.20261. Learned Counsel on behalf of the Appellant, on instructions, states that the matter has been amicably settled and the payment has been made, which is endorsed by the learned Counsel for the Respondent.2. In view of the submissions made, the Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn and is disposed of accordingly. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J MARCH 27, 2026 NThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 17:35:46...
Sabar Bhatti vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1306/2025 SABAR BHATTI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anmol Kumar Pandey with Ms. Jyoti Yadav and Mr.Nitin Yadav, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Abhinav Kumar and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates. SI Deepika, P.S.: Timarpur.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks his 1st spell of furlough for a period of 03 weeks.2. By way of the impugned order dated 05.10.2024, the petitioners application for furlough has been declined on the ground that the petitioner had not earned the requisite 03 annual good conduct reports.3. Notice on this petition was issued on 24.04.2025. Status Reports dated 04.05.2025 and 10.07.2025 have been filed in the present petitio...
Aiman Talal Faiz Chishti vs Central Board of Secondary Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1592/2024 & CM APPL. 10881/2025 AIMAN TALAL FAIZ CHISHTI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Baisla, Ms. Archana Goswami, Ms. Pratima Saini, Ms. Neha Yadav, Mr. Hemant kumar Niranjan, Advs.versusCENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Kumar and Ms. Anjle Gupta Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.03.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed before this Hon'ble court may please to issue the directions to the respondent No. 1 Central Board of Secondary Education to correct the date of the birth of the petitioner in the record as 11.12.2002.2. The facts are that inadvertently the date of birth of the petitioner wasmentioned as 21.12.2003 in the school (Kalka Public School) records while getting an admission in Class X. Accordingly, the date of birth of the...
Shiv Nath @ Suryanath vs Neeraj
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 445/2019 & CM APPL. 22318/2019 SHIV NATH @ SURYANATH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Shiv Nath, appellant present-in- person.versusNEERAJ .....Respondent Through: Ms. Pooja Pandey, Mr. Alok Motan, Mr. S.C. Motan and Ms. Sonia Motan, Advocates. Mr. Neeraj, respondent present-in- person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.03.20261. The parties in the present appeal who are brothers, have settled theirdisputes through a Mutual Settlement Deed dated 4th August, 2021, which has been placed on record. The said Settlement Deed bears the signatures of the appellant and the respondent.2. It is specifically noted in the aforesaid Settlement deed that the appellant shall withdraw the present appeal.3. The appellant is present in Court and confirms his signatures on Settlement Deed and his decision to withdraw the present appeal. 3.1. A copy of the Aadhaar Card of the appellant is also taken on record.4. Accordingly, in view of...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs Harish Babu
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6187/2024 and CM APPL. 25724/2024 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Manisha Singh, Mr. George Pothan Poothicote, Mr. Kanav Khatana, Ms. Ojeswita Singh, Ms. Jyoti Singh, Ms. Swati Yadav, Advs. with Mr Anil Gautam (DTC representative)versusHARISH BABU .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi B. Singh, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 27.03.20261. Through the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner prays for thequashing of order dated 19.12.2023 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal), wherein the O.A. No. 2088/2016 filed by the Respondent was allowed.2. The Tribunal had directed the Petitioner to grant benefits of MACP/ACP Scheme to the Respondent on his completion of regular service for the prescribed period.3. The Respondent was removed from service vide order dated16.09.1994, however, the same was set as...
Pvr Ltd vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation Through Its Commissioner ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8560/2019 PVR LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate.versusSOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER (SOUTH) .....Respondent Through: Dr. Monika Arora, Standing counsel with Mr. Subhrodeep Saha, Ms. Anamika Thakur, Mr. Prabhat Kumar and Mr. Abhinav Verma, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.03.20261. Ms. Shobhana Takiar, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner,submits that in view of the order of acquittal dated 25th October, 2024 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI ACT) - 03, South, Saket District Court, the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition. 1.1 A copy of the said order has been handed over in Court today and the same is taken on record.2. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. AMIT BANSAL, J MARCH 27, 2026/RzuThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can...
Ojas Jain vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7284/2025 OJAS JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Alka Singh, Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sahaj Garg, SPC with Mr. Rudra Paliwal, GP for UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.03.20261. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition, as the same has become infructuous.2. Hence, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JASMEET SINGH, J MARCH 27, 2026/spThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2026 at 12:30:05...
Anisha Jain vs H.T. Media Solution
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 27th March, 2026 + CM(M) 1468/2023 & CM APPL. 46794/2023 ANISHA JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Advocate. (appearance not given)versusH.T. MEDIA SOLUTION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Madhur Dhingra and Ms. Harleen Dhingra, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner/defendant under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, assailing the order dated 19th July, 2022 and 14th February, 2023 passed by the learned Trial Court in case bearing No. CS (COMM) 284/2022.3. At the outset, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he is pressing the present petition only in respect of the impugned order dated 19th July, 2022, whereby the defence of the petitioner has been struck off.4. Heard. Record per...
Union of India, Service Through the Secretary & Ors. vs Shri Bala Krus ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~7 to 9* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12227/2023 and CM APPL. 48082/2023 UNION OF INDIA SERVICE THROUGH THE SECRETARY & ORS. .....Petitioners BALA KRUSHNA PANDA & ORS. .....Respondents(8) + W.P.(C) 12246/2023 and CM APPL. 48146/2023 SHRI BALA KRUSHNA PANDA & ORS. .....Respondents(9) + W.P.(C) 12270/2023 and CM APPL. 48254/2023SHRI BALA KRUSHAN PANDA & ORS. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 27.03.20261. The present petition is a batch of three connected matters.2. Learned counsel representing the Respondents submit that the three O.As filed by the Respondents will be withdrawn today itself.3. These 03 connected Writ Petitions were filed against the transfer of 03 O.As from the Kolkata Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal to the Cuttack Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal.4. Since the Respondent is withdrawing all the 03 O.As, the present Petitions are rendere...
Union of India Service Through the Secretary & Ors. vs Bala Krushna Pa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~7 to 9* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12227/2023 and CM APPL. 48082/2023 UNION OF INDIA SERVICE THROUGH THE SECRETARY & ORS. .....Petitioners BALA KRUSHNA PANDA & ORS. .....Respondents(8) + W.P.(C) 12246/2023 and CM APPL. 48146/2023 SHRI BALA KRUSHNA PANDA & ORS. .....Respondents(9) + W.P.(C) 12270/2023 and CM APPL. 48254/2023SHRI BALA KRUSHAN PANDA & ORS. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 27.03.20261. The present petition is a batch of three connected matters.2. Learned counsel representing the Respondents submit that the three O.As filed by the Respondents will be withdrawn today itself.3. These 03 connected Writ Petitions were filed against the transfer of 03 O.As from the Kolkata Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal to the Cuttack Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal.4. Since the Respondent is withdrawing all the 03 O.As, the present Petitions are rendere...