Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ibrahim vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 27th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 30th March, 2026 + W.P.(C) 3976/2026 IBRAHIM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Mr. Kailash Kumar Jha, Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Mr. Fareeduddin, Ms. Srejal Mishra, Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Ms. Poonam SPC for UOI with Jitender Kumar Tripathi (GP) Ms. Meherunnisa Anand , Mr. Sirish Gupta Advs. SI Bijender Singh Ms. Vaishali Gupta and Ms. Rashi Aggarwal, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINPrathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Mr. Ibrahim, underArticle 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend from the vending site i.e., on the Footpath/Open Space, near Gate No.2 Kasturba Hospital, Kasturba Ho...
Raj Kapoor vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 184/2026, CRL.M.A. 9380/2026, CRL.M.A. 9381/2026CRL.M.A. 9382/2026RAJ KAPOOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Grover, Advocate with Mr. Parth Mudgal, Advocates.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. SI Abhishek Singh, P.S.: Wazirabad.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 Mr. Amit Grover, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed-of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, JMARCH 27, 2026/hbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:38:35...
D R Vadera and Sons HUF vs New Delhi Municipal Council Through Its Cha ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3920/2026, CM APPL. 19174/2026 & CM APPL. D R VADERA AND SONS HUF .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Thakur Sumit and Mr. Gaurav Rathor, Advocates.versusNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCILTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Saurabh Seth and Mr. Ravi Kishan Chandna, Advocates forNDMC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.03.20261. The present writ petition has been seeking the following reliefs:W.P.(C) 3920/2026 Page 1 of 32. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the demandof Rs. 41,30,883/- raised by respondent/NDMC vide communication dated 11th February, 2026 is unjustified as the rateable value of assessment years from 1st April, 2000 to 31st March, 2009, is the subject matter of a pending property tax appeal. He further submits that insofar as the demands for the subsequent period are concerned, the petitioner is willing to pay the same.3. However, the petitioners grieva...
M/S Shanti Refrigeration Ind. Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Rajasthan Metals & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2287/2026M/S SHANTI REFRIGERATION IND. PVT.LTD......Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar and Ms. Manisha Ranjan, Advocates.versusM/S RAJASTHAN METALS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi and Ms. Yogita Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9332/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 9333/2026 (condonation of 04 days delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.2. The application is allowed and disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2287/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9331/2026 (stay)3. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner impugns the proceedings in Criminal Complaint bearing No. 16395/2019 filed under secti...
Aditya Krishna vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 27th March, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 989/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9289/2026 & CRL.M.A.ADITYA KRISHNA.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohan Wadhwa, Mr. Arun Kanwa, Mr. Alok Kumar and Mr. Varun Rawat, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS......Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State with SI Ashish Kr. Sharma. Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Standing Counsel for ED with Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Karan Grover, Mr. Anikate Kumar Singh and Mr. Pawan Kumar Gangwal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioner is accused in FIR No.0059/2024 dated 12.03.2024 underSections 274/275/276/420/468/471/120B/34 IPC, registered at P.S. Crime Branch.2. He is presently lodged in Central Jail-07, Tihar Jail, Delhi. It isapprised that on account of some threat perception, he was permitted to join the proceedings through video-conferencing and, now, the learned Trial Court has directed his physical appearance...
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 vs Rajan Sh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 255/2026 CM APPL. 19453/2026 CM APPL. 19454/2026THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONALTAXATION -3.....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC with Mr. Anant Mann, Jr. SC and Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, Jr. SC.versusRAJAN SHARMA.....Respondent Through: Mr. Ved Jain and Mr. Sparsh Kapoor, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 27.03.20261. By way of the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961), the appellant has assailed the Order dated 12.08.2025 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), in ITA No.2118/DEL/ 2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, whereby the appeal filed by the Department was rejected and the Order dated 30.06.2025 passed by the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal) [CIT(A)] was upheld.2. Three principal issues involved in the present appeal relate...
Raju Singh vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2248/2026 RAJU SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. SI Shubhanshu, PS-Kalyanpuri. Complainant in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.03.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIRNo. 439/2015 dated 09.05.2015, registered at Police Station Kalyanpuri, Delhi, under Section 354A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.2. After some arguments, Mr. S.K. Sharma, learned counsel for thepetitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.3. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.PRATEEK JALAN, JMARCH 27, 2026Bhupi/SD/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. ...
Ctr Manufacturing Industries Pvt. Ltd. Through Authorised Signatory Sh ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3950/2026, CM APPL. 19261/2026 & CM APPL.CTR MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORYSHRI DINESH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anmol N. Suryavanshi, Ms. Damini Vishwakarma & Mr. B. Dhananjay, Advocates.versusDELHI JAL BOARD THROUGH ITS CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeepan Pathak, Mr. Rahul Gupta & Mr. M.K. Arora, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.03.2026CM APPL. 19261/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.W.P.(C) 3950/20262. The present writ petition has been filed seeking setting aside of theorder dated 29th March, 2025, as well as the water bills dated 12th January,2023 and 15th July, 2023, issued in respect of property no. C-60B/C-60 FF, First Floor, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019.3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/ DJB submits that eventhough the total outstanding amount due from th...
V vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 980/2026 V .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anushkaa Arora, Adv. (DHCLSC) with Ms. Anchal Yadav, Adv.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Adv. for Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with SI Deepika, PS.: TimarpurCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 02.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 10056/2026 (For marking of appearance of Ms. Anushkaa Arora, Advocate for the appellant)1. By virtue of the present application, the learned counsel forpetitioner seeks marking of her appearance in the order dated 27.03.2026.2. For the reasons stated in the present application, the same is allowedand appearance of Ms. Anushkaa Arora, Advocate (DHCLSC) is included in the order dated 27.03.2026.3. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.4. Needless to say, the present order shall be read in conjunction withthe order dated 27.03.2026.SAURABH BANERJEE, J.APRIL 2, 2026/bhThis is a...
Mayank Trehan and Ors vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 27th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2247/2026, CRL.M.A. 9202/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9203/2026 MAYANK TREHAN AND ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varunb Chandiok, Ms. Anubhi Goyal and Mr. Armaan Sharma, Advocates P-2 & P-3 in person P-1 (Through videoconferencing)versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for State/R-1 Mr. Sunil Satyarthi, Ms. Amita Saxena, Ms. Archisha Satyarthi, Mr. Amit Anshu Satyarthi, Mr. Kaibalya Kumar Ojha, Advocates for R-2 along with R-2 in person W/SI Bala Rani and SI PankajCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 472/2021 datedproceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) andpetitioner No.1 was solemnized on 14.08.2019, as per Arya Samaj rites and customs. There is no child from such wedloc...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »