Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahul J. Sheth vs Durgesh Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 86/2026, CRL.M.A. 9256/2026, 9255/2026 &CRL.M.(BAIL) 625/2026RAHUL J. SHETH .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for petitioner (appearance not given)versusDURGESH SHARMA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 27.03.20261. Petitioner assails order dated 18.02.2026 of the appellate courtwhereby on account of default in compliance with the directions under Section 148 Negotiable Instruments Act, suspension of sentence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act was revoked.2. Learned counsel for petitioner has taken me through records and it iscontended that suspension of sentence was not subject to deposit 20% of the compensation amount, therefore, the suspension of sentence once granted could not have been revoked. In this regard, learned counsel has taken me through record.3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that after conviction,the ...
Sh Roshan Jal vs Anil Bharti Chief Engineer
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 502/2026 SH ROSHAN LAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shreya Sharma, Mr. Paritosh Saraswat, Mr. Tarandeep Singh, Mr. Kashish Kumar and Mr. Dheeraj Vats, Advocates.versusANIL BHARTI CHIEF ENGINEER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghvendra Upadhyay, Panel Counsel with Ms. Purnima Jain, Ms. Shivpa Taneja and Mr. Madhur, Advocates for GNCTD. Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Standing Counsel for MCD. Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 27.03.20261. After arguing at some length, the learned Counsel for the Petitionerstates that the Petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present Contempt Petition with a liberty to move an appropriate application seeking relevant directions for preservation of the water body in question.2. Accordingly, the present Contempt Petition is dismissed as withdrawnwith liberty as prayed for.DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJTEJAS KARIA, JM...
R and C Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs National Highways Authority ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3986/2026, CM APPL. 19571/2026, CM APPL. 19572/2026,CM APPL. 19573/2026R AND C INFRAENGINEERS PVT. LTD. & ANR......Petitioners Through: Mr. Anirudh Wadhwa, Ms. Debarshi Chakraborty, Mr. Kanishk Garg and Mr. Kartik Gupta, Advs.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, SC and Mr. Adithya Ramani, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 27.03.20261. This petition has been listed through a supplementary list circulated inthe post-lunch session on a mentioning made before the Honble the Chief Justice.2. The learned counsel for the petitioners states, he has instructions towithdraw the present writ petition.3. Accordingly, the present writ petition and the pending applications aredismissed as withdrawn.V. KAMESWAR RAO, JMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, JMARCH 27, 2026/srThis is a digitally signed o...
Dolly Gupta vs Mlp Developers and Promoters Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2159/2024 DOLLY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vidyut Kayarkar, AdvocateversusMLP DEVELOPERS AND PROMOTERS PVT LTD& ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Satija, Mr. Sowjhanya Shankaran, Ms. Charu Sinha, Ms. Anuka Bachawat and Mr. Akash Sachan, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9239/2026-Early hearing and seeking withdrawal of main Petition in terms of Settlement (by Petr.)1. By way of the present application, the learned counsel appearing onbehalf of the petitioner seeks early hearing of the present petition. He states that the matter has been settled and he seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. In view of the settlement, the present application is allowed anddisposed of.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.CRL.M.C. 2159/20244. In view of the settlement and order passed in CRL.M.A. 9239/2026,the present petition is...
Dr Aruna Mishra vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5005/2023 DR ARUNA MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Yamini Sharma, Adv.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC with Mr. Uday Singh Ahlawat, Ms. Tania Ahlawat and Mr. Nitish Kumar Singh, Advs. for GNCTDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER% 27.04.2026CM APPL. 28053/2026 (for restoration)1. The connection of the learned Counsel for the applicant isdisturbed.2. Re-notify on 18 May 2026.C.HARI SHANKAR, J.OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.APRIL 27, 2026/akyThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 13:38:53...
Nishant Goyal and Anr vs Shivraj Singh Tyagi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~19 to 21* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2761/2024 & CRL.M.A. 10531/2024 SHIVRAJ SINGH TYAGI AND ANR .....Respondents + CRL.M.C. 2762/2024 & CRL.M.A. 10534/2024 + CRL.M.C. 2763/2024 & CRL.M.A. 10537/2024 NISHANT GOYALA AND ANR .....PetitionersCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.03.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the mattershave been amicably settled between the parties. He states that he be permitted to withdraw the present petitions.2. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.Pending applications also stand dismissed.3. It is made clear that the parties shall remain bound by the terms of thesettlement.4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MARCH 27, 2026/rr/R...
Supreme Court Bar Cooperative House Building Society & Ors. vs South D ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4639/2021 & CM APPL. 14259/2021 SUPREME COURT BAR COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aayush Agarwala and Ms. Mukti Heliwal, Advocates.versusSOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, standing counsel for MCD. Ms. Rachita Garg, Advocate for GNCTD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of six (6) clubs(hereinafter, petitioner clubs) seeking quashing of the circular dated 16th October, 2020 issued by the respondent, i.e., erstwhile South Delhi Municipal Corporation (presently, Municipal Corporation of Delhi).2. A further relief sought in the writ petition was quashing of three (3)orders dated 29th October, 2020 and two (2) show cause notices dated 18th November, 2020 issued by the respondent/ MCD.3. Mr. Kapil Dutta, counsel appearing on behalf of th...
Scipharm Sarl vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 159/2022 SCIPHARM SARL .....Appellant Through: Ms. Naina Gupta, Mr. Anshul Saurastri and Mr. Jay Shah, Advocates.versusASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Mr. Aryan Dhaka and Ms. Sunidhi Tyagi, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 27.03.20261. The present appeal was filed against the rejection of the Indian PatentApplication No. 6771/DELNP/2013 titled "Method For Enhancing Engraftment Of Haematopoetic Stem Cells" vide the order dated 29.05.2020 on the ground of non patentability under Section 3 (i) of the Patents Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The impugned order is extracted hereunder: DECISION An application for a patent bearing number 6771/DELNP/2013 was filed on HAEMATOPOETIC STEM CELLS". As per the provision under Section 11A of Patents Act, the said application was published on 23/01/2...
Ex. Hav Mahipal Singh vs Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6365/2023, CM APPL. 24998/2023 and CM APPL. 19252/2026 EX. HAV MAHIPAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Rathod, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, CGSC with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Ms. Nyasa Sharma, Mr. Ankit Khatri, Maj. Kanika Sharma, Army, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, GP and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 27.03.20261. On the previous date of hearing, i.e., 01.12.2025 the followingorder was passed:1. None appears for the Petitioner.2. Re-notify on 27 March 2026.2. The matter has been called out twice today and on bothoccasions, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioner.3. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present Petition is dismissedfor non-prosecution. All pending applications stand closed.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, ...
Mankind Pharma Limited vs Manking Pharmaceutical Private Limited & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 337/2024 & I.As. 9226/2024, 9231/2024, 38800/2024 MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ankur Sangal, Mr. Ankit Arvind, Mr. Shashwat Rakshit and Ms. Nidhi Pathak, Advocates.versusMANKING PHARMACEUTICAL PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Defendant No. 2 in person through VC.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 27.03.20261. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking a decree ofpermanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in any goods or services under the impugned marks MANKING/ / / and/or any other trademark identical or deceptively similar to Plaintiffs registered MANKIND trademarks as enumerated in paragraph 13 of the plaint, amounting to infringement and passing off, amongst other reliefs.2. During the pendency of the suit, parties have amicably resolve...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »