Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Jitendra Sharma vs Delhi Technological University and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 27.03.2026+ W.P.(C) 3938/2026SHRI JITENDRA SHARMA.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Adv.versusDELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY AND ORS.....Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. for R-1& R-3.Mr. Shikhar Sardana and Mr. Ajay Singh, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J.(ORAL)CM APPL. 19247/20261. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 3938/2026 CM APPL. 19246/20263. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitutionof India with the following prayers: a) Issue order, direction or writ in the nature of mandamus or anySignature Not Verified W.P.(C) 3938/2026 Page 1 of 9other appropriate writ for setting aside the consolidated result dated 28.01....
Frizzon Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3941/2026FRIZZON SERVICES PVT. LTD......Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Chaturvedi, Mr. Sumeet Singh, Ms. Anvi Kumar, Advs.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS......Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.03.20261. The sole grievance of the petitioner is as under:a. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No.2 Council to forthwith take up, hear and decide the reference filed by the Petitioner against the Respondent No. 3 under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 bearing Application No. UDYAM-DL-03- 0013923/S/00001 dated 21.07.2025, within a timebound period to be fixed by this Honble Court; b. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent No.1 to ensure proper functioning of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Councils within...
Mahabir Singh and Ors vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3917/2026 & CM APPL. 19171/2026 (Exemption)MAHABIR SINGH AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Viksit Singh, Advocate for P-1 to 4.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi, Ms. Minu Kumari, Advocates for R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 27.03.20261. This petition seeks, inter alia, issuance of a writ of mandamusdirecting concerned Consolidation Officer to grant requisite sanction under Section 30 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, and directing Sub Registrar-IX to register the Sale Deed in respect of the subject land situated in Village Mundhela Khurd, Tehsil Najafgarh, New Delhi.2. The case of Petitioners No. 1 to 3, as borne out from the record, is thatthey are the recorded co-owners/co-bhumidars of agricultural land, bearing Khasra No. 1 etc.//244/1(9-5) and 1 etc./244/2(2-10), admeasuring 11 B...
M/S Shanti Refrigeration Ind. Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Rajasthan Metals & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2277/2026 M/S SHANTI REFRIGERATION IND. PVT.LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar and Ms. Manisha Ranjan, Advocates.versusM/S RAJASTHAN METALS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi and Ms. Yogita Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9303/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 9304/2026 (condonation of 04 days delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.2. The application is allowed and disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2277/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9302/2026 (stay)3. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner impugns the proceedings in Criminal Complaint bearing No. 16394/2019 filed under sect...
Smooth Industrial Products Limited vs Arvind Kumar Saxena Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 86/2026 SMOOTH INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Krishna V.S., Mr. Ashish Sharma and Ms. Kamana Divyasree, Advocates.versusARVIND KUMAR SAXENA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Prachi Pareek, Advocate along with Respondent No. 1 in person. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram, Advocate for R-2/Registrar of Trademarks.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 27.03.2026 I.A. 8246/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 86/20263. This rectification petition is filed on behalf of the Petitioner underSections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 for a direction to4. Issue notice.5. Ms. Prachi Pareek, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf ofRespondent No. 1.C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 86/2026 Page 1 of 26. Ms. Nidhi Raman, learned CGSC accepts notice on behalf ofRespondent No. ...
Dravida Makkal Masotha Katchi Through Its President Sh M Mayavenkatesa ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3942/2026DRAVIDA MAKKAL MASOTHA KATCHI THROUGH ITSPRESIDENT SH M MAYAVENKATESAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocate.versusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, Mr. Siddhartha Goswami and Mr. Ashish Shukla, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:2. The petitioner filed an application under Section 29-A of theRepresentation of the People Act, 1951 for registration of the proposed political party. The respondent/ Election Commission of India (hereinafter ECI), vide communication dated 23rd February, 2026, pointed out certain deficiencies in the application which were rectified by the petitioner videW.P.(C) 3942/2026 Page 1 of 2communications dated 2nd March, 2026 and 9th March, 2026.3. Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, counsel appearing on b...
Anoop Gaur and Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~88 & 104* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2244/2026 & CRL.M.As. 9193-9194/2026ANOOP GAUR AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sumit Mishra and Mr. Udath Singh, Advocates with petitionersversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Ram Singh PS Govind Puri and SI Raghuraj Singh PS Sangam Vihar Mr. Pawan Gupta and Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocates for complainant.+ CRL.M.C. 2297/2026 & CRL.M.As. 9368-9369/2026HARI PRASAD GUPTA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pawan Gupta and Mr. Anmol Sharma, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Ram Singh PS Govind Puri and SI Raghuraj Singh PS Sangam Vihar Mr. Sumit Mishra and Mr. Udath Singh, Advocates for ComplainantCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANCRL.M.C. 2244/2026 & connected matters Page 1 of 11ORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. No. 9194/2026 (for exemption) in CRL.M.C. No. 2244/...
Kamini Sharma vs Geeta Malik
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2249/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9204-05/2026 KAMINI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.H. Ansari, Advocate.versusGEETA MALIK .....Respondent Through: Ms. Hiteshi Kakkar, Mr. Amrit Singh Khalsa, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.03.20261. The present petition has been preferred assailing the order dated15.11.2025 passed by the learned Magistrate in Ct. Cases. No. 8005/2017, whereby the petitioners application seeking recall of two witnesses of the respondent/complainant for the purpose of further cross-examination was declined, as well as the order dated 24.12.2025 passed by the learned Sessions Court, by which the revision petition against the said order, being Crl. (Rev) No. 467/2025, came to be dismissed.2. The proceedings before the learned Magistrate arose out of acomplaint instituted by the respondent against the present petitioner in the year 2017 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrumen...
Hendostan Institute of Technology and Management vs National Council f ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3912/2026 & CM APPL. 19165/2026HENDOSTAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ANDMANAGEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kishore, Ms. Jyoti Jyotsana, Advs.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.03.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (a) Pass an appropriate order, direction or writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing the impugned withdrawal order File No. NCTE/2025/ NRC/ PAR/ ORDER/NRCAPP-3957/(230079-230085) dated 31.05.2025 issued by the respondent No.2/NRC, NCTE in the interest of justice and in the facts and circumstances of the present case; and(b) Pass an appropriate order, direction or writ in the natureof mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing th...
Vardayni Global Llp vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 973/2026, CRL.M.A. 9175/2026, CRL.M.A. 9176/2026 VARDAYNI GLOBAL LLP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manasmay Jha, Ms. Sonal Amasthi, Mr. Gagandeep Sharma and Ms. Aanchal Khanna, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Adv. SI- Dhananjay Gupta, PS: Kirti NagarCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.03.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: 1. Direct the Police Authorities, P.S. Kirti Nagar, Delhi to register FIR against the Accused persons named in LLP vs State of NCT of Delhi pending adjudication before the Court of learned CJM, West, Tis Hazari, Delhi.2. Direct the Police Authorities, P.S. Kirti Nagar, Delhi toconduct a full, fair and time-bound investigation against the Accused pers...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »